delete

Shine a light this muppet obviously does this kind of thing from his bedroom lol,even our hardest resident Canelo fans don't come out with gold like this

 

This content is protected

 

Geale was drained for the Cotto fight.......Golovkin knocked Geale out at Geale's weight, he did not have to drain himself. Golovkin would knock Cotto out easily................

 

I'm not sure if this is a complement or insult...

 

Not very good?..

So you just mentioned some good and tough fights he's been in where they were close (except mayweather), But he's not good?

So is lara Cotto etc not good too if the fights were close? For a fight to be close he must have been doing something right otherwise it would be a one sided loss like mayweather

 

Go back and watch MMA, noob, you clearly dunno s!t about boxing.

 

Why not just write what you actually think " Golovkin will win that fight but I'll keep hating on him anyway".
Boxing teacher lol https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/...P45QSso7VtE4ZtTIeCnCi0CDrLw9jJuzms9h8XqYBMwVk

 

I really dont like the way Oscar and Canelo have done business over the last few years, i wanted to see anybody who faced him beat him and ive joined in with all the El Pollo jokes and ridicule aimed at him.

I just cannot bring myself to say "Hes not very good". He is good he is an elite Boxer, ofcourse he is. Losing to a Golovkin wont change that. Personally i think 160 pounds is a weight limit where the real hurt in his punches has faded against the bigger guys and his physical dimensions mean he will be losing out on height and reach to most opposition in the Middleweight division. His weight is forcing him to fight at 160 but everything else about him says his limit is 154. (hence the 155 nonsense)

And we have been demanding he faces not just any 160 pounder but the one all the other 160 pounders seem scared of. If this fight didnt make huge money then Oscar wouldnt be putting his man anywhere near this one.

 

Lol at the op using Canelo to bash Golovkin.

Not that subtle BE.

Only one guy took your bait though, try harder next time

The winner of Canelo vs GGG will be the face of boxing in the near future whether you like it or not

 

Canelo has got a very good resume,if he loses to GGG he just lost to the better fighter, like he did against Floyd.

I didn't think the Cotto fight wasn't all that close, I thought he beat Trout in a close but clear fight and I thought he scraped by Lara but admit that depending what you look for it could have gone against him.

Canelo is an excellent fighter.

 

But Golovkin is elite, so he would have lost to a fellow elite.

 

I see absolutely no logical reason why either of these two fighters should feel devastated by a simple loss. The possibility of losing is part of the deal in any contest. It would be similar to saying that world chess champion Boris Spassky should have quit chess or felt worthless as a chessplayer because he lost to Fisher.

 

Fans needs to view this fight through the lens of a 35 year old against a 27 year old in a professional boxing match context. Historically speaking, no fighter is at their prime at 35 years old and is in fact usually at least 2-3 years past it. This is especially marked when we exclude the HWs from the comparison.

Therefore we should be giving GGG treble the credit if he manages to beat Canelo.

When you add in the fact that the judging is likely to be way in favour of Canelo. GGG realistically needs to knock out victory to get a win here.

 

How much do you bench?

 

Well answer this.

Floyd Mayweather Jr beat a guy who'd never fought a professional fight.....Floyd is a bonafide top 10 to 15 ATG....how was he unable to cut off the ring and instead ended up following around a guy who is 0-0?

No fighter is the complete article but Canelo and GGG are elite.