I will read it again, but I have to get some sleep, I'm on EDT........................read the Judd Berstein letter, he is a high powered attorney, it will blow your mind, esp. if you believe Vegas is not corrupt...............
Spin it however you want, but Canelo's highlights are way better than Triple G's. Canelo wasn't fighting in spurts the entire fight. Only in a handful of rounds, was Canelo fighting in spurts, G's best rounds.
I'm writing a breakdown of the fight, I made around 40 gifs while watching it of both guys best work, it will be done by tuesday.
Yes we all no officially it was a draw.... But people who know boxing and no that most of the things judges look for in a fight will have seen GGG doing them things with a much higher work rate than Canelo . So despite the fact it was ruled in the books as a draw 80% of the boxing world believe a draw is bull and GGG was rightful winner
I'm similarly old fashioned in the way I score fights. Gif highlight reels may be all well and good if you have the attention span of a gnat but I'll stick to watching the whole fight myself. I felt the same way when I was told if you watch Mayweather Pacquaio in slow motion whilst upside down listening to the Benny Hill theme tune that it becomes a clear Pac win. No thanks, I'll just watch the whole fight in real time and score it round by round.
There's a huge gallery on the scene (Ironically named "Photos: Canelo, Golovkin Trade Big Shots in Vegas - HUGE Gallery") Just sayin...
What kind of nonsense.. So using your theory.. if I fight someone and they land a perfectly timed uppercut that lands clean on me but nothing else throughout the fight, whereas I just land jabs all night.. I lose because I have the worse highlights?