Dempsey Above Ali, Pound For Pound?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by McGrain, Jul 12, 2007.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,916
    47,914
    Mar 21, 2007
    What do you think?

    I guess there'd be less than 20 pounds between their peak weights...
     
  2. Duodenum

    Duodenum Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,604
    290
    Apr 18, 2007
    Yes, Dempsey above Ali, pound for pound. Ali may have been the fastest man in boxing during his peak, but nobody inflicted physical damage on an opponent so much larger than Willard was to Dempsey. (Keep in mind, that until Carnera/Loughran, this was the greatest weight disparity ever between contestants for the HW Title. (I think it might still hold the record for second place.)
     
  3. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,217
    170
    Jul 23, 2004
    I disagree. Dempsey may well have inflicted more physical damage on Willard. But that accomplishment alone doesn't make him special, well it obviously does to a certain extent, but not special enough to have a career more impressive than Ali's. Dempsey reigned for longer than Ali did without tasting defeat, I'm not going to dispute it.

    Ali beat Liston, Frazier, Foreman, and Norton. Does Dempsey hold wins over fighters of equal or greater quality than those four?. The awnser is, no. Willard, Firpo, Gibbons, etc. Ali also came back from adversity during his career. His ability to regain the title after Frazier beat him was questioned, and nobody gave him a chance against the powerful punchers, Liston and Foreman.

    What other heavyweight has wins over three other heavies who could easily make a top 10 list. Liston, Frazier, and Foreman.
     
  4. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    Alis accomplishments are greater than Dempseys by far plus he was faster despite being bigger.
     
  5. DaveTheWave

    DaveTheWave Man Extraordinaire Full Member

    436
    10
    Jul 9, 2007
    20 lbs doesn't matter much. Once you get above 185-190, you can hurt anyone. Ali would have dealt with better opposition than Dempsey.
     
  6. NickHudson

    NickHudson Active Member Full Member

    894
    21
    Apr 13, 2007
    Yep, I think this statement ends the debate in one sentence!

    If you 'scale' Ali down to Dempseys size, his speed and elusiveness start to go through the roof.

     
  7. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    Imagine if Ali was a welterweight. He would make Ray Robinson look like a lummox!:yep
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,916
    47,914
    Mar 21, 2007
    Quite right - but is it not also true that Dempsey is stronger and more powerful scaled up? If he's already hitting harder than Ali as things stand...
     
  9. Muchmoore

    Muchmoore Guest

    Great point, imagine a 210 pound Dempsey.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,916
    47,914
    Mar 21, 2007
    Enough to keep Vitali Klitschko awake at night I guess.
     
  11. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    Hes called Mike Tyson
     
  12. C. M. Clay II

    C. M. Clay II Manassah's finest! Full Member

    2,276
    19
    Sep 23, 2006
    Mike Tyson is not 6'-4".:D
     
  13. rekcutnevets

    rekcutnevets Black Sash Full Member

    13,685
    344
    May 25, 2007
    I would have to pick Ali over Demsey. Ali faced all comers, Dempsey could be held behind the "color line." It may not have been Dempsey's fault, but is true anyway.
     
  14. Ramon Rojo

    Ramon Rojo Active Member Full Member

    624
    22
    Dec 5, 2005
    Ali is better than Dempsey in every field, that includes power.
     
  15. hobgoblin

    hobgoblin Active Member Full Member

    810
    26
    Jul 31, 2004
    Hell no. Apples to oranges here. Ali was a completely different KIND of fighter - size is not the issue.