Dempsey Didn't Jab Enough?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by PetethePrince, Feb 14, 2010.


  1. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    A little off topic, but how did he think he would go against Harry Wills?
     
  2. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    261
    Jul 22, 2004
    Well after watching my Harry Wills career set and familiarising myself with his skills and abilities I would say.....
     
  3. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    But your not exactly Jack Dempsey, are you?
     
  4. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,898
    Feb 21, 2009
    My dad asked Jack about Harry Wills. Jack said Harry would have been a great challenger and he had personally wanted to defend against him. Jack also said he was sure he would have won.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  5. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    I think i would agree with Jack on that one.
     
  6. Maxmomer

    Maxmomer Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,373
    40
    Jun 28, 2007
    What did he have to say about the Flynn loss? or his sparring sessions with Harry Greb?
     
  7. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,898
    Feb 21, 2009
    Sorry. I never asked him about Flynn or Greb. To my knowledge, my dad never asked him about them either.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  8. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,898
    Feb 21, 2009
    I would, too.
     
    Journeyman92 likes this.
  9. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    261
    Jul 22, 2004
    Based on your extensive viewing of Wills Im sure
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,561
    Nov 24, 2005
    Dempsey might not have thrown enough jabs but he made them count when he threw them, (just as Tyson did).

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdCcMZZoVMY[/ame]

    Check out the jab at 3:48
     
  11. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    It's funny to watch those old school, transitional-small-gloved boxing fights.

    Keep Hands at waist. Throw a punch. Pull them back to guard your waist. :lol:
     
  12. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,561
    Nov 24, 2005
    Yes. They had great technique.
     
  13. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Indeed, very strict and consistent. You'd be hard pressed to see them accidentally use a high guard and punch from there. Compare that to how often post-40's boxers forgot a high guard!
     
  14. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,561
    Nov 24, 2005
    Well each boxer is different. Some prefer to have their hands low, others high. Many boxers vary where they hold their hands, depending on opponent or tactics. And where they hold their hands isn't really the important factor - you can live under a peek-a-boo your whole career and get pummelled in the head non-stop if you're not a good boxer. If you're good you can do whatever works for you.
     
  15. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    152
    Mar 4, 2009
    Gibbons held his hands low even compared to the average boxer of his era but he could get away with it in his prime. It's like Tony Canzoneri and Barney Ross, one got by with his natural instincts (Canzoneri) and the other with flawless technique (Ross).

    Dempsey shows a good jab in sparring sessions and based on the books he wrote knew as much as anyone about boxing but he often didn't utilize his techniques to the full extent in actual fights. Perhaps he favoured sheer aggression over technique, and no one can say it didn't work for him.