Dempsey in Marciano's Era

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Hydraulix, Mar 14, 2010.


  1. Hydraulix

    Hydraulix Left Hook From Hell.. Full Member

    1,767
    23
    Oct 4, 2008
    Does The Mauler go 49-0 like Rocky Marciano did? Or would he suffer a few defeats along the way?
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well it's hard to say, isn't it. Dempsey's heart didnt appear to be in defending the title in the same way that Rocky's was, but then he fought in a different time. He was the first champion to make more from the title than from being the champion, but he's not at all far removed from that culture of earning money by proxy, if you catch my meaning.

    My sneaking suspicion is that he drops a loss or two. Marciano didn't drop off by an inch in terms of commitment to the cause throughout those 49 fights and that sort of intensity shouldn't be underestimated. Of course Dempsey would be the best HW of his time were he to swap with Marciano, but he didn't demonstrate to me the type of intensiyt that brought Rocky the 0. 47-2 is my prediction.
     
    djanders, BCS8, TBI and 3 others like this.
  3. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Does not go undefeated.
     
  4. MRBILL

    MRBILL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    21,116
    110
    Oct 9, 2008
    Naw..... Demps would hang and do well with the 50s crop just like Marciano did....... Not a whole lotta difference there......... Come the 1960s? Well, that's another story.......

    MR.BILL
     
  5. Hydraulix

    Hydraulix Left Hook From Hell.. Full Member

    1,767
    23
    Oct 4, 2008
    Who do you think would stop Dempsey? Would it be Walcott, Charles, LaStarza, Matthews, etc?
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    He beats them all on paper.
     
  7. PetethePrince

    PetethePrince Slick & Redheaded Full Member

    28,760
    84
    May 30, 2009
    Just as the US Olympic Basketball Team did in 2004, yet they came away with the Bronze.

    He losses... I don't know he just does. He grows complacent somewhere. The only change is the harsh conditions. Maybe he's not starving and getting KOed by Flynn... but who really knows the validity of these stories. The truth is somewhat of a land min.

    If I'm required to choose someone to beat Dempsey it's Walcott.
     
    HolDat likes this.
  8. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,236
    Feb 15, 2006
    And looses to one of them in corporeal reality?
     
  9. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    I think Walcott might be able to win over ten rounds with Dempsey. A hard fight to pick though.

    Charles? Now that's a hard pick and I honestly
    think either man could win, and either man could gain a stoppage. It's hard though, because Ive never really contemplated Dempsey against that crop before, nor have I imagined him fighting Floyd Patterson.

    I may have to mull it over more, there are some great fights to be discussed
     
  10. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Dempsey would probably go undefeated if he was in the same era and circumstances as Marciano was.

    If he was connected with Al Weill and had Goldman in his corner and working with him after a few fights - as Marciano had.

    I'm not saying Marciano had it easy, but Dempsey had it awful rough for the first 3 years or more, and he still managed a decent record. I'm no expert on American economic history and geography, but from what I understand the conditions in post-WW2 New England, for an ex-GI, even for a struggling pug, were qualitatively better than the hobo jungles of 1915 western desert states where Dempsey learned his trade with full commitment to success. And, again, I stress that Marciano had some good big-time boxing connections and tutors from fairly early on.
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,986
    48,067
    Mar 21, 2007
    One of more of them in my opinion, yes. Maybe drop the title and then pick it up again.
     
  12. Ezzard

    Ezzard Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,070
    19
    Nov 11, 2005
    Dempsey would be held in higher regard. Would he have won them all? Who knows... But he'd have been the better HW in every match up.

    Charles as a younger man probably would have taken Marciano. Dempsey? I'm not so sure.
     
    swagdelfadeel and Reinhardt like this.
  13. Son of Gaul

    Son of Gaul Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,628
    30
    Feb 16, 2010
    Great post and I do agree with you. Who do you see Dempsey losing to? I think Charles would give him fits but that's really about it...:think
     
  14. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    400
    Jan 22, 2010
    Dempsey in his prime,circa 1917 and before, could do anything Marciano could do as good and in most cases better..Dempsey was so much a faster puncher, with two hands,his great left hook and right cross..A better defense, Dempsey could move around quickly when needed...Dempsey could avoid solid punches, with his bobbing and weaving style,also...I take nothing away from the Brockton Blockbuster...Marciano also cut easily, while Dempsey seldom was seriously cut...Both had great chins...I believe Jack Dempsey had a much harder and more tested youth than Rocky had, no doubt...I saw Marciano in his prime, and loved his tenacity...But this is what puts me in Dempsey's corner...Virtually every boxing expert who saw both Dempsey and Marciano. in their primes picked Dempsey superior to Marciano...VIRTUALLY everyone...How could I ,90 years later , not respect those great writers of yesterday, who saw young Dempsey and Marciano ringside in all their fights...Please , tell me why I'm wrong or illogical, siding with all the boxing experts who SAW them both in their careers...Thus I feel Dempsey prime fighting all of Marciano's opponents, would have had the same unbeaten record as Rocky had...I'm willing to learn...
     
    Reinhardt likes this.
  15. djanders

    djanders Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,065
    6,932
    Feb 21, 2009
    If Dempsey fights Marciano's schedule, with no layoffs, I can't find an opponent on Rocky's record that Dempsey doesn't find a way to beat...in my opinion. So I guess I'm in the 49-0 camp. :good

    Then some of the young guys on here could talk about how Dempsey was too small for the Klitschkos and how Jack's (actually Rocky's) competition was ****. Wait! That's what they do anyway! :p
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.