Dempsey, Liston, Holyfield, Frazier.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Aug 19, 2011.


  1. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,645
    Dec 31, 2009

    exactly.

    ali did not have to be at his absolute best to beat that version of Liston proving Listons peak was indeed prior to this.
    This makes sonnys prime about 3 years, the other champions in this discussion were regarded as the best heavyweight in the world for longer.
     
  2. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,645
    Dec 31, 2009
    :good
     
  3. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    28
    Nov 15, 2009
    Whether Ali was clowning or not before the Cooper knockdown. He ****ed his **** up quick time immediatley after it.
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,686
    47,410
    Mar 21, 2007
    ...not really an interesting question then?
     
  5. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,645
    Dec 31, 2009

    Its the best i can do! lol.
     
  6. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,811
    44,812
    Feb 11, 2005
    Boxing is not a summation of how one scores in categories. It is a fluid physical performance orchestrated by acquired physical intellect, the latter of which is of the most importance and which Ali had in greater abundance versus Frazier.
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,392
    21,037
    Sep 15, 2009
    Good point choklab, but liston was undoubtedly considered the best in the world at time of the victory by clay.

    Truth be told, i'm not sure a prime frazier beats that version of liston.
     
  8. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,645
    Dec 31, 2009
    pehaps, but I would give the frazier who blasted quarry, ellis and went nonstop at ali for 15 rounds a good chance against the tired Liston who chugged and puffed after 4 rounds in the first clay fight.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,392
    21,037
    Sep 15, 2009
    guess we'll never know.

    One thing is certain, ali did shake up the world and deserves full credit for doing so. hell he'd have been credited just for losing competitively.
     
  10. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,469
    26,992
    Feb 15, 2006
    Liston's training prior to the first Ali fight seems to have been less than stellar.

    Also there is significant evindence that he had an injury goint into that fight.

    I submit that if these points are upheld, then we would have to credit Machen as having faced the better version.
     
  11. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,001
    12,879
    Jan 4, 2008
    If you take Ali by his word, you'd be tempted to go for the Liston version as the better fighter. He went on record saying that that version would have had a much easier time with Foreman than he had in reality at least...
     
  12. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,001
    12,879
    Jan 4, 2008
    And this could have nothing to do with him fighting the fastest HW of all time?:huh Someone who was physically and mentally prepared for the biggest fight of his life and who after a couple of rounds found out that he actually was as good as he was trying to persuade himself and everybody else that he was?

    In short; the speed and fluidity of his moves, the accuracy and balance of his punching are the mark of a truly great fighter for anyone who cares to see it. That's really all there is to it. The rest is just digesting air. But...
     
  13. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,001
    12,879
    Jan 4, 2008
    What do you know about his fitness going into the Machen fight then?
     
  14. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,392
    21,037
    Sep 15, 2009
    You know, with liston, we can speculate all we want. Maybe he'd have ruled until 67 and lost out till frazier, maybe he'd have ruled till 73 and lost out to foreman. Maybe ali is the one obstacle to him being a goat heavyweight.

    A fighter can only be judge respective to their era imo.

    I can buy into liston being top dog from 59 but for me, he didn't do enough to rank above the other 3 in any category other than h2h.
     
  15. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    Holyfield
    Frazier
    Dempsey
    .
    .
    .



    Liston

    Holy and Dempsey had the deepest resumes (most wins vs. HOFers), Frazier had the best single win (Ali).

    They were all equally dominant against what opponents they fought.

    Frazier (FOTC).

    Frazier takes all the others IMO.

    Liston was a level below the others - sparse record against top fighters, and the most embarrassing losses in title fights.