exactly. ali did not have to be at his absolute best to beat that version of Liston proving Listons peak was indeed prior to this. This makes sonnys prime about 3 years, the other champions in this discussion were regarded as the best heavyweight in the world for longer.
Whether Ali was clowning or not before the Cooper knockdown. He ****ed his **** up quick time immediatley after it.
Boxing is not a summation of how one scores in categories. It is a fluid physical performance orchestrated by acquired physical intellect, the latter of which is of the most importance and which Ali had in greater abundance versus Frazier.
Good point choklab, but liston was undoubtedly considered the best in the world at time of the victory by clay. Truth be told, i'm not sure a prime frazier beats that version of liston.
pehaps, but I would give the frazier who blasted quarry, ellis and went nonstop at ali for 15 rounds a good chance against the tired Liston who chugged and puffed after 4 rounds in the first clay fight.
guess we'll never know. One thing is certain, ali did shake up the world and deserves full credit for doing so. hell he'd have been credited just for losing competitively.
Liston's training prior to the first Ali fight seems to have been less than stellar. Also there is significant evindence that he had an injury goint into that fight. I submit that if these points are upheld, then we would have to credit Machen as having faced the better version.
If you take Ali by his word, you'd be tempted to go for the Liston version as the better fighter. He went on record saying that that version would have had a much easier time with Foreman than he had in reality at least...
And this could have nothing to do with him fighting the fastest HW of all time?:huh Someone who was physically and mentally prepared for the biggest fight of his life and who after a couple of rounds found out that he actually was as good as he was trying to persuade himself and everybody else that he was? In short; the speed and fluidity of his moves, the accuracy and balance of his punching are the mark of a truly great fighter for anyone who cares to see it. That's really all there is to it. The rest is just digesting air. But...
You know, with liston, we can speculate all we want. Maybe he'd have ruled until 67 and lost out till frazier, maybe he'd have ruled till 73 and lost out to foreman. Maybe ali is the one obstacle to him being a goat heavyweight. A fighter can only be judge respective to their era imo. I can buy into liston being top dog from 59 but for me, he didn't do enough to rank above the other 3 in any category other than h2h.
Holyfield Frazier Dempsey . . . Liston Holy and Dempsey had the deepest resumes (most wins vs. HOFers), Frazier had the best single win (Ali). They were all equally dominant against what opponents they fought. Frazier (FOTC). Frazier takes all the others IMO. Liston was a level below the others - sparse record against top fighters, and the most embarrassing losses in title fights.