Interesting points, still "best performing" in a given year is equal to "best heavyweight" in a year, surely? What occured to stop the Wills fight happening? Are you sure there was no demand for Greb? Less demand than for his title defenses against Miske, Brennan, Carpentier, Darcy, Gibbons & Firpo? Surely Dempsey-Greb would've drawn much bigger revenues than Dempsey-Darcy? Was 40-32-33 Darcy considered a good title defense at the time? :think
Nobody, he just failed against every better man he faced. I don't rate the guy as highly as many other classic members do, by the way.
I dont think so. "best heavyweight" can often be a contender who is seen as the future of the division. "Best performing" can be a champion seen as keeping the seat warm. I think that is well documented. you dont sighn to fight somebody if you are avoiding them. wills was number one contender to willard from about 1915 yet it is dempsey not big jessie who gets the beef for a fight not happening. wills could not have been as good in the dempsey era as he must have been in the willard era could he? It could have happened if the people demanded it as much as the firpo or carpentier fights. personaly, rightly or wrongly, I think carpentier was a bigger fight and resulted in the feeling a smaller fighter had no chance against the champion. there just was not enough hype behind greb, maybe he suffered from over exposure fighting as often as he did? maybe fans would only buy into international mystery contenders from the other side of the world? The darcy fight was a work out, recently bumped into dempseys title defences as a world title fight. It never used to be the case.
Brennan pretty much got dominated against every contender he faced, nevermind champions. If you've got eyes its pretty clear Williams is about 10levels above Brennan. Williams had been shot and lost 70% of his intestines before facing but then again you already know that No, no demand to face Greb, just loads of demand to see him face 2 fighters Greb dominated in Brennan and a dying Miske, the public found those match ups far more interesting Why couldn't they have moved Wills-Dempsey to another state like Lewis did with Tyson?
"Jack Dempsey successfully defended his heavy weight championship last night for the first time since he won from georges carpentier at Jersey City, more than a year ago. Jimmy Darcy, a 'stable mate' of Dempsey’s was the opponent, and the champion received the decision after four rounds of boxing. Such is the information that reached here today from Buffalo, to find confirmation at the office of the New York Boxing Commission. Dempsey, originally carded to box an exhibition with three opponents at Buffalo last night, was confronted, just before entering the ring, with a telegram from the local office of the New York Boxing Commission, advising that he would be permitted to meet only one opponent, and that the bout must go to a decision. Jimmy Darcy, light heavy weight, who has been on tour with Dempsey for the last several days, was selected as the opponent. The champion took no chances on any adverse decision being given, the advices from Buffalo state, and boxed in a masterly fashion for the four rounds. At the conclusion the decision was his by a wide margin. At the office of the New York commission today, Secretary Harry burchell said: 'Of course the bout had to be a decision. We had to see that the law was upheld. We make no distinction between exhibitions and regulation contests, according to law.' So Darcy has the distinction of having lasted longer with the champion than Georges Carpentier, jess willard, ed gunboat smith or carl morris. Had Darcy landed a 'lucky' punch he would be the world’s heavy weight champion today." San Francisco Chronicle
Well on my list he's probably 12th atm. Starting with his underrated lhw fights against maxim and durell. Then rewatching the moore fight. Then his past prime fights he lost. His win over cooper and his last fight with ali. That's my plan anyways.
I said that Dempsey's was deeper than Frazier's, not that he had the single best win. I think Dempsey's demolition of the heavyweight division on his run to Willard was better than anything Liston did. Levinsky (KO3), Morris (KO1), Gunboat Smith (KO2), Fulton (KO1), Willard (KO3)...
After reading responses and further analysis I hit the following conclusion. Resume: Unless anyone can prove otherwise i'm happy to believe that jack wanted the fight with wills and tried to make it happen which stops it being a duck so doesn't really detract from his legacy. Same with frazier, i'm happy believing that whilst he was champ norton and shavers weren't really viable opponents. Holyfield has no case for ducking anyone as far as i'm concerned. He fought all of his top contenders including lewis, plus he fought a lot of the new guard in ruiz, byrd, toney and rahman. Liston was more avoided than a ducker, unless all the documentaries i've seen about him are exaggerated. Legacy: Dempsey will be remembered as a lightning quick heavyweight who destroyed his opposition for the most part. From 18-23 he was certainly the premiere hw and maybe even during his hollywood years it was considered noone could beat him, i'd have to look into that further. His longevity in beating sharkey to establish himself as the top contender nearly ten years after winning the crown is very good. The one black mark, for me, is that he never cleaned up his division. Frazier won the fotc, from 67-73 he was the premiere hw which he proved by beating all the contenders as well as the recently unretired ali. His longevity is not there really, or maybe i'm being harsh, how old was he when he lost to foreman? Either way, he never really recovered. Liston will be remembered as one of the most intimidating heavyweights in history, deserving a shot long before he got one and destroying the champ with ease. Who knows how long he'd reign was it not for ali. Holyfield, well from 90-94 he did the business beating the champ twice, two legends and a top contender. However a loss to moorer and bowe saw him labelled as shot but his historic return to tyson placed him back at the top where he remained until lewis beat him. Even then he still continued to fight the best long into retirement age he still dreams of unifying again. His legacy is borne out of being a warrior who fights the best achieving amazing results. Skillset/dominance: Dempsey has a great combo of speed and power plus has underrated durability. He was known for being deadly accurate. Despite his reputation of being a giant killer I don't see him doing too well against the greats from 1950 onwards but he dominated those he faced during his prime. Frazier had a style that complimented his skillset perfectly. One of the best left hooks in history and a newly appreciated chin. Only the hardest of hook throwers would trouble him greatly imo and for a good 5 years he was a dominant force. Liston has atg jab, power and chin. Frankly he's one of the toughest match ups for anyone in history dominating is a hallmark of his. Holyfield was a great all rounder who showed great variety through his career and perhaps I underrate him h2h but to me he's a jack of all trades master of none despite beating the best he was never seen as a dominant force. Round robin result prediction over 15. Liston 3-0 (1) Frazier 2-1 (0) Dempsey 1-2 (0) Holyfield 0-3 (0) Greatness ranking: Holyfield Frazier Dempsey Liston
That's up for debate with Wills and Greb in the picture That is a serious stretch. Ali was champ in '67 and lineal until '71. Frazier was still a little green in '67 and hadn't any big wins at that stage. He didn't win the unification until '70 and the better fighters were probably on the WBA tournament