Dempsey vs Brennan2 98 years today

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by The Long Count, Dec 14, 2018.


  1. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    8,876
    Oct 8, 2013
    any thoughts on this bout and on Brennan in general. Looks like he gave decent account on film. Had a solid win loss record although I wouldn’t say his competition was A level. And he couldn’t beat Greb going 0-4 but no shame there.
    Dempsey’s legs good in this fight lot of life and he is ripped.
     
  2. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    30,077
    36,897
    Jul 24, 2004
    Brennan outweighed Dempsey by 10 pounds or so (187-198). He took a bad beating, surviving only because he grabbed and held like an octopus. Still, he took a good shot and gave Dempsey some good punches.

    Dempsey looked to be in great shape although his manager said the fight
    lasted 12 rounds only because Dempsey was screwing around (literally) very hard during training.
     
  3. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,440
    9,427
    Jul 15, 2008
    Brennan was a tough guy and a good puncher . The legend goes Jack didn't really have his eye on this fight although he looks to be in terrific condition, very fresh still in the 12th and still packing serious power late .. I enjoy watching this fight. Dempsey shows conditioning and late round power in a fight where he started a bit under prepared and off his game.
     
    Last edited: Dec 14, 2018
    The Long Count and mcvey like this.
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,122
    Jun 2, 2006
    I think Brennan gets a bit underated.Dempsey said no one hurt him more,even though they were good friends.
     
    he grant likes this.
  5. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,428
    8,876
    Oct 8, 2013
    Yeah this fight kind of goes a little under the radar as far as Dempsey bouts go, I usually see the Willard bout, Carpentier, Firpo and Tunney 2.
    This fight Dempsey looks in terrific shape, although as two posters have noted allegedly that wasn’t the case, and it was an enjoyable watch.
     
    The Malibu Mauler likes this.
  6. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    30,077
    36,897
    Jul 24, 2004
    Dempsey ko'd Brennan in 6 (as you all know) a couple years earlier. First time Brennan had been off his feet in 67 fights. And it was a bad beating, too.

    Dempsey really started living the high life once he got the belt....after years of living as a hobo, who could blame him?
     
    louis54 likes this.
  7. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    From "Smokestack Lightning":

    "...[Harry] Greb was back in Pittsburgh two days later. His next fight was at Forbes Field, which afforded him the novelty of sleeping on a bed with Mildred instead of a railroad bench with Mason. He was looking forward to giving Brennan his fourth consecutive beating when he heard that Brennan was being lined up for a shot at the new heavyweight champion. All he had to do was give “a good showing” on August 23. Greb blew his top. “I’ll prevent that meeting,” he said. “I’ll give Brennan such a lacing that he will not be fit to fight Dempsey or anyone else for many weeks.” He also promised to put a decisive end to their one-sided tête à tête, and did.

    Dempsey gave Brennan a shot anyway. Greb could do no more than delay it, and it wouldn’t be the last time he bumped off a prospective opponent only to see him propped back up and given a king’s ransom. Brennan extended Dempsey almost twelve rounds before he got stopped. He did unto Dempsey what Greb routinely did unto him—busted him up. Dempsey finished with a swollen eye, a torn ear, and an admission that it was “just about the most closely contested fight I ever had.” Greb broke into a wide smile at that and told a reporter that “his idea of a life of ease and comfort would be fighting Brennan once a week for a fair purse, until he retired from the ring because of old age.”
     
  8. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,440
    9,427
    Jul 15, 2008
    Brennan was certainly a stiff puncher.
     
  9. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,440
    9,427
    Jul 15, 2008
    How do you think Greb would have done against Dempsey over 15 rounds in 1919 or 1920 ?
     
  10. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    I've since become convinced that Greb himself was right. All he'd have to do was keep from getting knocked out and he would pile up points and take a decision. The next question is, how realistic is it that he could keep from getting knocked out? Greb himself put that question to the test in NYC and Benton Harbor.

    There is an assumption among observers today that Greb would tire and Dempsey would get to him late. That's funny. Greb was just getting started around round 10.
     
    Berlenbach likes this.
  11. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,440
    9,427
    Jul 15, 2008
    Not sure it's only fatigue but fatigue from a larger man with his own speed and far superior power. It is a fascinating match up.
     
  12. Stonehands89

    Stonehands89 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,775
    312
    Dec 12, 2005
    You're right -Dempsey was 5 inches taller, about 30 lbs heavier, almost as fast and aggressive, and hit harder. But Dempsey knew first hand that Greb's power was underestimated. He said that Greb had very good power in both hands. He just rarely set and preferred to speed all over you. If or when you get "Smokestack" there's a 5-6,000 word treatment on this subject in a chapter called "Prohibtion Blues."

    The fact that Dempsey went with Brennan in 1920 after Greb tore him up four consecutive times in 1919 is telling. And it was neither the first time nor the last time he'd give title shots to Greb's casualties, as you know.