I think anywere from 6-15 rounds is were dempsey-maybe a little cut and bloodied would catch and ko a smaller greb,greb himself said a later tunney had grown to big so -lets say a prime 1920 dempsey vs greb with his superb power ko,s greb around 10
well when tunney was smaller he was beat by greb and even though Tunney wasnt the heavy weight he turned out to be and Tunney beat a past prime Dempsey Greb beat the man who beat the man and supposably handeled Dempsey for 2 or 3 rounds of sparring.I think Dempsey would catch Greb sooner or later, I dont doubt Dempsey's winning but it might take him a couple rounds to catch him.
Tunney was young and green in first Greb fight, and was still developing in next bouts with Greb. Also different styles. Dempsey hit way harder than most, while Tunney was a good puncher, not like Dempsey though.
Greb starts fast, wins the first third, but wears down. Dempsey would start imposing his size and his bodywork would start slowing Greb in the middle rounds and eventually Greb would go down.
I pick Greb. He did better against common opponents, owned Dempsey in sparring, and has a style advantage.
Did Greb really do better against common opponents? At least, common opponents around the same time Dempsey faced them. When Dempsey was in his prime? You could argue that at certain times Greb did fare better than Dempsey in short bouts or ones where Dempsey could be outboxed for a bit, but I think the important thing to note is that Dempsey was knocking these men out. Brennan, Miske, Levinsky, Morris, Fulton... ... Greb would probably look better than Dempsey in the early goings, just as he is alleged to have done in sparring, but towards the middle rounds the gulf in power and size would take its toll, heavily. Greb would see the end of the bout but the last five rounds would sway heavily in Dempsey's favour I should imagine. This is all based on the belief that Greb can really hang with Dempsey - I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt and relaying the myth a little bit, but I do genuinely believe he'd last til the end. Take the first five, split the next five, Dempsey takes the last five... Close decision but Dempsey definitely wins the battle.
Greb arguably did better against Gibbobns and Brennan (who also picked Greb over Dempsey) overall and certainly did better against Meehan, he did just as well against guys like Battling Levinksy (who he beat 6 times to d Dempsey's one, though Dempsey beat him by KO), yeah, I think it's fair to say he did better overall. When Greb matched Brennan in 1919 there were some who didn't score Brennan a round. Brennan ended up getting the shot of course.
A couple of rounds sparring is different to 15 rds,Im sure Dempsey was trying flat out in sparring, but Greb was a tough guy to catch. Greb takes an early lead and makes Jack look a bit silly,by the 4th round Dempsey would be frothing at the mouth ,by the 8th ,Jack would have landed some big stuff to slow the Windmill down a bit,from the 9th its Dempsey's fight . Greb said at the finish of his series with Tunney "Gene was too big and hit too hard".Dempsey was NOT Tunney , he commences to land regularly after the 9th rd and scores a stoppage win late ,maybe around the 13th-14thrd. No disgrace for Harry to put up such a battle against the Mauler.
I think way, way too much stock is put into this quote. Greb was past prime by the time of that fight, almost certainly completely blind in one eye and Tunney, a master tactician had had more than forty rounds to study his man. Having said that, I'd definitely pick Demsey over Greb around the time of the last Tunney fight (and they were STILL talking about making the fight up until Dempsey signed to fight Tunney).
Doing a good job of pointing out examples and I would agree with you, but like I said, it's the knockout that makes me think otherwise. Greb was undeniably a greater fighter for his size, having decisioned those men so many times that Dempsey perhaps struggled with (sometimes), but his punishing blows were in a different league.
Dempsey could have KO'd Greb I think. The man was really hard to hit and had a great chin, but like you say, Dempsey is a special puncher. But I don't agree with a Dempsey points shout. I think he would have to catch and stop Greb. I've seen the fight touted over 8, 10 and 15 rounds. I'd pick Harry over the first two distances in a heartbeat. Fifteen i'll admit is more interesting, but it's worth noting that Greb REALLY busted guys up, even big guys, he ****ed them up. Greb finished almost every fight he fought stronger than his opponent (though there are exceptions) including guys who really mussed him up early doors, like Kid Norfolk, for example. That, plus the way Greb handled Jack in sparring - and he did handle him, bled him, out-roughed him and out-hit him, and Jack sparred hard - makes me wonder. Dempsey always talked confidently of winning though. In fact he was dismissive of Greb's chances.
The best analogy I can think of at the moment is Monzon-Napoles. Napoles was probably winning those first two rounds, hooking Monzon quickly and surprising him at times, but then the physicalities shone through in Monzon's favour. In sparring you could imagine the same thing happening, but in a real fight it's when the bigger man hits back hard in the middle rounds that something starts to happen. If Dempsey cracked Greb hard enough, would Greb even recover?
Greb's recovery was pretty astonishing, anytime he was queered he came firing back the same round or the next, but it's possible that Dempsey could swing it with a punch, sure. No doubt about that. But Greb seems to have been so fast AND so accomplished at HW and also has that near-unreadbale un-sparrable style. I don't like him for Dempsey and neither did Jack's people. Though it should be noted that Greb sometimes boxed "straight-up" in some of his biggest fights because he was worried that his style was to unorthodoxed for title judges. Boxing like that would have gotten Greb KO'd.