Dempsey-Willard under LPR rules

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Senya13, Feb 5, 2008.


  1. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,956
    2,410
    Jul 11, 2005
    What would have happened, had the two fought under London Prize Ring rules?
    First, the downed boxer had half a minute to rest.
    Second, lack of protection of the fist (no gloves) would make Dempsey more cautious about his hitting to the head, as he could break his hands.
    Third, with wrestling allowed, weight advantage of Willard could come into play.

    In all the question is more like, would Dempsey make a good bareknuckle fighter, and did he have enough skills to beat the much bigger men under such rules?
     
  2. Russell

    Russell Loyal Member Full Member

    43,649
    13,045
    Apr 1, 2007
    His hands were supposedly nearly indestructable regardless, so he'd probably fit in well.
     
  3. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,522
    27,094
    Feb 15, 2006
    Dempsey would definitely have needed to hold back on punches to the head though he would still have been able to employ a devastating body attack. Also Willard would have been able to take a knee whenever he was in trouble and get a 30 second rest.

    These factors would have made for a much longer fight and more methodical beatdown. A Willard win cannot be ruled out.
     
  4. ChrisPontius

    ChrisPontius March 8th, 1971 Full Member

    19,404
    278
    Oct 4, 2005
    Willard's strengths (endurance, size, stamina, physical strength and durability) are likely to make him a great fighter under LPR rules. I'd still pick Dempsey, but if we're talking about a peak Willard who dethroned Johnson, who knows ?