Dempsey's pre-title run, quality of opposition

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Unforgiven, Jan 8, 2011.


  1. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,561
    Nov 24, 2005
    Dempsey, I suppose.
    I'm not sure the names and categories you suggest are accurate though, but it will do.
     
  2. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    27,953
    12,762
    Jan 4, 2008
    Feel free to correct how you feel it should look. It was a bit off the cuff. If Dempsey's pre-title run was more impressive, I find it hard to justify placing Liston above him in ATG rankings.
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    261
    Jul 22, 2004
    Mc I know he didn't fight Langford/Wills/Greb on the way up, but did he avoid them or just not cross paths with them?? Is there any evidence of specific avoidance? Cheers
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,523
    47,057
    Mar 21, 2007
    I'm no expert, at all - I don't think it matters, terribly, if you can get a run at the title without tackling the best, that doesn't really matter all that much. It's when you're on top you should meet the best.
     
  5. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,561
    Nov 24, 2005
    Well, I'm not entirely sure, that's why I started the thread. It could be dead-even. Comparisons are difficult.

    I don't see Valdes as a top-tier fighter on Liston's ledger, he was past his best and coming off a bad run (losses to Alonzo Johnson and Charley Powell in his last three). Dempsey clearly beat several men of that caliber.
    Whitehurst has a mediocre record.
     
  6. bman100

    bman100 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,795
    27
    Jan 6, 2010
    Langford challenged Dempsey in 1916, Jack said no, he would have been KO'd at that point in his career anyway. He only really became a world class fighter in later 1917 after hooking up with Kearns.

    Even though his qulaity of opposition is not very good, KO'ing the #1 contender in 18 seconds is pretty impressive. Even the best fighter of the era, Harry Greb turned down a fight with Fulton saying: "It's not that I'm afraid of Fulton, or that I don't think I can beat him,'but he's tall and has a fine jab and might bust me up pretty good before I could get to him. I have too many main events left in me to take the chance." Quoted by Harry Keck, one of Greb's friends. And the way he demolished the champ who was huge compared to him is impressive. Only a guy like Louis has a shot at doing to Willard what Dempsey did IMO.
     
  7. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    53
    Dec 26, 2009
    Johnson was more skilled than Dempsey, plus he was heavier & stronger in the clinches i would bet.
     
  8. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    Dempsey was perfect for Johnson. He is going to walk at him and keep getting tied up and pushed off. Little Jack isnt winning this one.
     
  9. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    53
    Dec 26, 2009
    Also the much heavier Johnson was a muscular man, who i confidently pick to easily out-muscle the lighter, soft-bodied Dempsey as they grapple, wearing him out & stopping a gassed Mauler late.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B5GKxp6cibQ[/ame]
     
  10. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    394
    Jan 22, 2010
    K, that's funny.Describing Jack Dempsey as" SOFT-bodied "is truly humorous.!
    Dempsey was described as powerful with whip-cord muscles. After koing big men Jack would bend down,and pick them up from the floor ala Firpo.He was called "amazingly "strong by Nat Fleischer. The "hardest" man the heavyweight division has produced,methinks.:good
     
  11. Kalasinn

    Kalasinn ♧ OG Kally ♤ Full Member

    18,318
    53
    Dec 26, 2009
    Dempsey did have a soft body & legs though, only his arms were muscular, whereas Johnson was muscular all over & demonstrated his functional strength all the time.

    Also...

    Dempsey against Williard: 187lbs.

    Johnson against Jeffries: 208lbs.

    Advantage: 21lbs of muscle.
     
  12. ticar

    ticar Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,264
    764
    Dec 7, 2008
    This content is protected

    dempsey looks pretty soft here fora a 180 lbs guy...love handles :nut
     
  13. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    394
    Jan 22, 2010
    b, to put this in the proper perspective : Jack Dempsey truly kod granite jawed Jess willard in the first round,flooring Big Jess 7 times. today the fight would have been stopped in the first round.
    It took the murderous punching Joe Louis THIRTEEN rounds to finally stop Abe Simon in 1941.No way Abe Simon lasts 13 rds.against Jack Dempsey, who was at his best a force of nature .Take care b...
     
  14. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    27
    Nov 15, 2009
    Has anyone else ever noticed that so many gypsies in Enlgand copy the hairstyle of Jack Dempsey???

    Just thought it was interesting, as they're infamously old school/backwards and infamously into boxing very much
     
  15. TheGreatA

    TheGreatA Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,241
    152
    Mar 4, 2009
    Johnson was probably the stronger man, but even he would have problems containing Dempsey's explosiveness in the early rounds. If he can survive the early onslaught, it's Johnson's fight to win, but I don't he ever quite saw a fighter like Dempsey, not that he couldn't handle one.