Probably, but the contract was still signed and both team Dempsey and team Wills had 2 months to find anyone willing to put this show on the road. I don't particularly care for Dempsey, he threw his best years away and whilst as a man his rags to riches story might make for great reading, as a fighter walking away from the sport and taking your belt with you is something that is ridiculous in my opinion. Had he retired his belt to go hollywood I'd have had more respetc but he absically put it in deep freeze for 3 years. However in regards to Wills v Dempsey, I think both could have tried harder, but none ducked each other.
"Both could have tried harder," Wills? He chased Dempsey for years, fought Firpo in an elimination, etc. I don't see blaming him at all. I think he would have fought Dempsey anyplace, anytime. His manager said as much over and over again.
I don't see blaming anyone. Both guys said they'd fight each other, it's a matter of record. They signed agreements, made the fight when backers pulled out at the last minute, they did their bit to make the fight. Ofcourse if both really really wanted to they'd have gone abroad and fought each other for free.
Uzcudun-Wills is not much to go on, but Harry makes only one attempt at a jab in limited footage, and meets the barrel chested Paulino on the inside, probably not the wisest thing to attempt on somebody with Dempsey's nickname. We do not see Wills make any effort to apply his height and reach advantages against an opponent who could not extend his left properly. Reports have Jack's brain trust not at all comfortable with the idea of taking on Tommy Gibbons off a two year layoff (and training down from a weight of 234 in the process), and I don't think Dempsey gets nearly enough credit for defending against a challenger Tunney wanted nothing to do with at the time. But concerns about the likelihood of a defeat against Wills is something I haven't read expressed by those insiders concerned about the Mauler's defense in Shelby. Yes, he should have defended against Wills. Nobody disputes that. Could Harry have ever defeated Jack for the title? Langford didn't think so, and I don't recall any serious arguments that the older Wills (already 30 when Dempsey was crowned) would have prevailed. Dempsey-Greb on July 4th, 1919 may be the ultimate fantasy match of all time that could have occurred in reality but didn't. The Windmill trashed Brennan in Tulsa over the championship distance the very day Jack hammered on Willard in Toledo. If the Mauler were to have made just one title defense before 1919 was over, Greb might have been the biggest draw of any American contender (especially since he served in uniform). Greb is recorded as ending January 1919 at 176 for Tommy Robson, just four pounds under Jack's alleged true weight for Toldeo. Concerning Wills and the color line, I blame Jack Johnson more than anybody. If he hadn't chosen to be so incendiary, then maybe Wills would have gotten his shot at Willard, the champion he had the best shot at dethroning. Instead, we had to wait till Louis just so somebody could even step in the ring for a chance.
One of the major ironies of history, is the fact that if Johnson had not been arested under the Mann act, he might well have vacated the title after the Flynn title defence. He might also have cashed out with a title fight against Sam Langford.
Just think how great he'd have been if he had, after beating Jeffries, defended against langford, mcvey, jeannette and gunboat? It upsets me to think about it. noone from that era could beat an inshape Johnson over 25 rounds. The fat guy that made sporadic appearances after whupping Jeffries, he'd lose to a few imo.
Just to point out that although I agree that Johnson was in tremendous shape for Jeffries, and that he wasn't eve in tremendous shape thereafter, he was out of shape for O'Brien and at less than his best for Kauffman. I don't know about Tony Ross, but if he was out of shape for that, which I'd bet on, it'd make him in shape for exactly two fights post-Burns, Ketchel and Jeffries.
I don't think Dempsey consistently demanded dogfights of bigger opponents. Firpo was supposedly not typical, and described by Teddy Hayes (I think) as a throwback fight to Dempsey's mining camp days. Many in the press noted Dempsey's recklessness and disregard for strategy. But I think Dempsey promised the fans that type of fight going in. Willard, in Dempsey's words : "You can't fight a man like Jess, you have to box him". And that's what he did.
I think he boxed him for about a minute. Whether he would have continued to box, nobody can say. He rushed Fulton and Firpo though.
I haven't seen the Fulton fight, but he boxed Willard up to the point he had him in serious trouble, then went for the kill.
The kill - the dogfight - lasted three rounds. The dofight with Firpo lasted the entire fight. I haven't seen Fulton either, but he seems to have gone straight to him to exchange punches. Three seriously bigger men in his career, three dogfights.