Deontay Wilder - too good to be true?

What the **** are you jabbering about?

The division is very good and getting better. We have a great champ in Wladdy, and very good contenders in Povetkin, Pulev, Thompson, Fury, Jennings.

When Wlad is done with this cycle by beating Fury and Povetkin in a rematch, he wil Segue into beating Glazkov and the winner of Teper-Helenius.

If he sticks aound, he will have fights in the future with rapidly moving young prospects such as Joshua, Parker, Martin, Wallin, Kuzmin and Granate.

Note the common thread here: WILDER HAS FOUGHT NONE OF THESE GUYS. He is now squandering a second defense on cripples who are not even in the top twenty.

Wilder will not fight Wladdy. If on the longshot that he is man enough to fight Povetkin he will be badly beaten. More likely he will abandon the title.

I am so sick of you ennabling nuthuggers who cannot face reality.

 

People said the same thing in the 90s when LHW Moorer, Frans Botha or Bruce Seldon held portions of the HW crown. I remember the time very well.

 

Why?

He's not that young anymore. He wasted five years of his career fighting walking dead corpses.

What part of him is charismatic? The beating up hookers in Las Vegas? The insulting of a true legend in Mike Tyson. Comparing himself with Wlad Klitsckho, a real champion? Having his buddy Malik Scott take a dive? The atrocious use of the English language? The title defenses against unconscionable opponents? The *******ual Mardi Gris mask video? The hackneyed and delusional yelling of "bomb squad" for no reason.

The guy is delusional about his own capabilities and borderline re****ed.

He is as stiff, deliberate, and windmilling as they come. I honestly think when you nuthuggers say he is "athletic" is is a code word. Some thing for "slick" and all of the other faux superlatives. He is manifestly none of these things.

No, the heavyweight division needs someone who is going to defend his "title" against better oppoents than Molina and Duhaupas so that it is worthy of being unifed with the real championship behing held by Wlad Klitsckho, who has 18 title defenses and taken on all comers.

God I hope this is a troll thread. Being knocked down by Dustin Nichols...Harold Scoiners...brining in buddy Malik Scott to take a dive...defending agaisnt Molina and then going life and death...s****ing the barrel to find Duhaupas...

No, he is not too good to be true.

He is not even going to defend against his mandatory.

Let me clear this up for your, he can't.

Stiverne is a guy who was beaten in four by Demetrice King. Wilder has proven that he is marginally better than Dustin Nichols and Harold Scoiners, and not nearly as good as prime Demetrice King.

Find a better pair of nuts to hug.

What the **** are you jabbering about?

The division is very good and getting better. We have a great champ in Wladdy, and very good contenders in Povetkin, Pulev, Thompson, Fury, Jennings.

When Wlad is done with this cycle by beating Fury and Povetkin in a rematch, he wil Segue into beating Glazkov and the winner of Teper-Helenius.

If he sticks aound, he will have fights in the future with rapidly moving young prospects such as Joshua, Parker, Martin, Wallin, Kuzmin and Granate.

Note the common thread here: WILDER HAS FOUGHT NONE OF THESE GUYS. He is now squandering a second defense on cripples who are not even in the top twenty.

Wilder will not fight Wladdy. If on the longshot that he is man enough to fight Povetkin he will be badly beaten. More likely he will abandon the title.

I am so sick of you ennabling nuthuggers who cannot face reality..[/quote]

This guy is a ****ing idiot. Please check out my response to him.

These federations make the same money on sanctioning fees if the best guy or the worst is the champ. Stupid assholes lile JAB don't understand this so they defend ****py "champions" who look like them, oblivous to the fact that a belt with no lineage such as the current WBC bauble would not be fit to hold the real champ's pants up.

 

As limited as Wilder is -- he would still easily smash a number of 90s title holders/contenders like Axel Schulz, Bruce Seldon, Henry Akinwande, Herbie Hide or Frans Botha.

 

:rofl

 

No Akinwande would beat him IMO.
Akinwande was short on 1 punch KO power but was a much more fluid boxer with nice footwork. Wilder's got a punching chance, but I wouldn't favor him.
Also Herbie Hide has a reasonably good shot to KO him.
Hide had very quick hands and good power.
I would only slightly favor Wilder.
Remember he did rock Rid**** Bowe.

This content is protected

 

If he was legit his management would let him fight ranked contenders. They will not. That is all you need to know. He is a very limited fighter because of his Chin. I can't remember a Heavyweight beltholder who had their first defenses as bad as Molina and Duhaupas and that includes WBO champions who have had some bad ones over the years.

Wilder has one win over a ranked contender (Stiverne) in 34 fights.

 

I'd actually pick Huggin' Henry and Herbie Hide over Wilder. Hide could really punch man, he woulda touched that defective chin and *BAM*, canvas nap.

 

Wilder is packing glass, end of story.

 

Schulz and Botha would have destroyed Wilder wtf
Hell they probably still can

 

:deal

they both starch that fraud. they were good heavies despite their flaws, Wilder is not.

 

Wilder would destroy them all in the first round!!!

Wilder is the future of the HW division

Wilder will be HW king.

 

This guy is a ****ing idiot. Please check out my response to him.

These federations make the same money on sanctioning fees if the best guy or the worst is the champ. Stupid assholes lile JAB don't understand this so they defend ****py "champions" who look like them, oblivous to the fact that a belt with no lineage such as the current WBC bauble would not be fit to hold the real champ's pants up.[/quote]

people tell me I look like wilder so I want him to succeed,,,,,i didn't know about him beating up hookers or whatever, that doesn't sound very good :!: if he got more famous maybe I could get a job as a wilder impersonator and get into lots of fancy clubs :hat

 

A wild, inexperienced 23 year old Wlad Klitschko destroyed Schulz in a one-sided mismatch. So no, Wilder is probably a good tad better than Schulz. Same with Botha.