Deontay Wilder - too good to be true?

What a sad state if affairs; Wilder's name will always be linked with Nichols for as long as he lives.. smh

 

True considering all the other bum's he fought will get no recognition.

Not fair I tell you..

 

The division stinks and has little talent. This is why Wilder was able to earn a portion of the heavyweight title. Just you mentiong Fury and Pulev make your post comical to me. Neither possess very good skills and are stiffs. I'd pick Wilder over either.

 

Funny but I remember that time very well also, and it was never frowned upon the way todays heavyweight division is.

 

If Dupapas can somehow ktfo Wilder, he'd take Nichols spot as #1 nemesis

 

This guy is a ****ing idiot. Please check out my response to him.

These federations make the same money on sanctioning fees if the best guy or the worst is the champ. Stupid assholes lile JAB don't understand this so they defend ****py "champions" who look like them, oblivous to the fact that a belt with no lineage such as the current WBC bauble would not be fit to hold the real champ's pants up.[/QUOTE]

Lmao!! You're an idiot!

 

Was he hurt or off balance? I think we all know he was off balance, by clowns with an agenda like yourself will claim he's "packing glass" because of this so called knockdown.

 

Was life and death, crawling helplessly around the ring. Video is pasted everywhere

 

A knock down is not defined by your judgement of whether he was hurt. He took a punch, he went down--that is a knockdown. It was not properly called because the ref is as re****ed as you and knows as little about boxing. As Benitom correctly points out, the video is all over the place and there are about ten of you idiots in the world who can't see that it was a knockdown.

My god you are stupid. He got a "piece of the title" because the WBC rigged it that way. They put a guy who was stopped by Demetrice King in with a guy who he had already beaten so that they would have a "champion" that could easily be beaten by a fraud. None of them are championship material and Wlad could beat Arreola, Stiverne and Wilder on the same night.

As for it being "comical" that Pulev could beat Wilder, well, lots of things seem funny to fools. Pulev beat much better competition than Wilder and took a shot at the real champion, losing honorably, unlike this fraud whose nuts you hang on. You should be ashamed to support a guy who defends his "title" against guys like Molina and Duhaupas and still struggles. It is because of metally challenged "fans" like youself that these **** ratings organizations can keep boxing fractured and unsuited for mainstream appeal. Congratulations on being a totally duped bozo.

As long as this farce is allowed to roll on the sport and the real fans suffer.

Sorry, but there is the truth of it.

 

the ref wiped his gloves and continued the match. Clearly, not a knockdown. There is a set of rules to this sport. But you wouldnt know anything about that :hi:

 

I don't know why you guys bother arguing with these fanboys. Knowledgeable boxing fans understand that there is a REASON Wilder is a fraud who fights nothing but stiffs, and that reason is found right in his fragile chinny chin chin!! :nod

 

The ref is as stupid as you and JAB. Or just corrupt. The entire world can go to Youtube and see as much.

 

Like I said, you're an idiot. I never said it wasnt a knockdown. If I have than point out where. And since you claim the WBA "rigged" it, than supply the proof or just shut up about it. Truth is you're making things up and its easy to see to any objective fan of the sport.

Pulev has certainly fought better comp, that doesnt mean he's the better fighter. Cotto has fought better comp than GGG, do we think he is the better between the two?

Lol, I wonder if you were calling Vittles Klitschko a farce for his pathetic reign in spite of being far more experienced. I wonder what you were saying about Wlad when he was fighting no hope chumps like Pianetta, Wach, Leapai, Mormeck and the Joke they call Fury? Wilder is fun to watch, he's nothing special. That he was able to beat one of the paper titlists though just goes to show how bad the era is. He'd be an easy pick over Fury to, who happens to be challenging Wlad for the title. So keep yapping with you hate filled agenda, Im finding it amusing...LMAO!!

 

Dry your tears little man.

 

Now you are a liar as well as a dimwit:

Was he hurt or off balance? I think we all know he was off balance, by clowns with an agenda like yourself will claim he's "packing glass" because of this so called knockdown.

"So called knockdown" literally means that you don't believe that it was. Do you speak Englsih as a primary language? Moron.

You are so stupid you don't even know what belt your *******ual crush holds. Good job.

It is almsot astonishing how thick you are. They paired up two guys for their title who are not top 20 heavyweights. Not hard to understand. I am no allowed inside of WBC strategy meetings so I have no written trascript per se. It is just something that is obvious to people with half a brain. As for shuttitng up, I will be here as long as I feel like pointing out how braindead and nuthugging you are.

You are not even a fan of the sport. You just like big, muscular men.

Everything you say is spectacularly devoid of intelligence. You think is some kind of great accomlishment that Wilder as a belt to hold his pants up and yet you stumble blindily into the fact that Pulev has beaten better competition. In a real world not controlled by corrupt ratings organizations and stupid, nughugging fans, that means that that Wilder's belt is a fraud. The WBC champ should have invited Pulev to fight for its belt, or any of the other 20 or so guys better than Arreola, Stiverne and Wilder. Then you throw a wobbler because I pointed out the corruption of the WBC (even if you think it is the WBA).

Really dude, just go to a male strip club. You have no knowledge of the sport.

What the...this is stupid even for you. Real fan measure fighters by who they have beaten and who they are willing to fight.

We measure fighters by who they have beaten, idiot.

I have no idea who Vittles is. If you mean Vitali, then his reign was neither great nor pathetic. He beat some decent comp in his title reigns such as Sanders, Peter, Adamek and Briggs. He is by no means a top ten ATG heavy...maybe top 25.

My god you are a dimwit. Wlad beat Povetkin, Byrd, Chagaev, Ibragimov, Haye, Thompson, McCline, Pulev--it is not possible for him to find a first class opponent every time. It is in no way comparable to Wilder WHO HAS NEVER FOUGHT ONE.

By the way stupid, Fury, Leapai and I believe Pianeta are mandatories. He had to fight them re****.

If you like flaiing, glass jawed cowards.

Yet you desperately want to suck his ****.

No stupid. No, no, no. This has already been explained to your re****ed ass--there are good fighters out there, Wilder has chosen to run from then like the coward that he is. It has nothing to do with the era. He is not fighting the best of the era. Stiverne is a guy who was stopped by Demetrice King, and Wilder could not even do that.

He is a COWARD for fighting Molina and Duahaupas, and you are a nuhugger for trying to deflect criticism.

No evidence of that. Fury would not be knocked down by Dustin Nichols.

Yup, real men fight the best. Cowards like Widler would rather fight scrubs like Duhaupas and brag about how they are "perfect."

Nut hugger.