Deontay Wilder v James Jeffries

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Seamus, Jan 21, 2017.


  1. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,134
    25,318
    Jan 3, 2007
    Agreed. Its like having an argument about cars and comparing a 1957 chevy to a 1987 Camero and saying " well maybe if we took the original motor out of the 1957 chevy, put in a 400cc engine and hooked up a nitris kit,etc,etc....." Well now you're not talking about the same car anymore but a souped up *******ized recreation of it.
     
    mrkoolkevin, Seamus and mcvey like this.
  2. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,117
    Jun 2, 2006
    Exactly!
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,510
    21,900
    Sep 15, 2009
    The version doesn't always exist though. Canelo has just signed to fight at 164 against Chávez, that version has never existed but I'll still discuss the fight.
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,510
    21,900
    Sep 15, 2009
    It just says Jeffries vs Wilder.

    My problem with keeping to the versions we saw is it leaves them at a disadvantage.

    If I think extra muscle helps a case I'll always see it.

    I'm fairly sure we'll probably disagree on this again next week at some point.
     
  5. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,134
    25,318
    Jan 3, 2007
    Taking an existing fighter who's successfully managed to add weight THEN waiting around to see how he fairs with it, is totally different than saying " if Jim Jeffries were alive he would beat Deontay Wilder if he added 20 lbs of muscle."
     
  6. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,134
    25,318
    Jan 3, 2007
    All the more reason not to pick them.
     
    mrkoolkevin likes this.
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,510
    21,900
    Sep 15, 2009
    I'm not saying he would beat Wilder. I don't think I made a pick actually as I haven't seen a lot of Jeffries.

    I just think if Jeffries is gonna have the best chance of success in this fight, he should add a bit of muscle.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,510
    21,900
    Sep 15, 2009
    But obviously people do successfully move up in weight despite this disadvantage. In almost every successful case the person has added muscle.
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,117
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yes because that is NOT Jim Jeffries.
     
  10. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,117
    Jun 2, 2006
    It doesn't say a hypothetical modern enhanced version of Jeffries does it?
     
  11. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,134
    25,318
    Jan 3, 2007
    Hey !!! I have a great idea. What if Michael Carbajal was given growth hormones to make him 6'5", and steroids to weigh 240 lbs of muscle, trained with Manny Steward in detroit, and been born to a family of factory workers? Do you think he'd beat Lennox Lewis?
     
    mcvey likes this.
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,510
    21,900
    Sep 15, 2009
    Nor does it say a version disadvantaged by inability to gain weight
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,510
    21,900
    Sep 15, 2009
    Not imo no.

    Then again I wouldn't have picked Spinks to gain 30 pounds and outbox Holmes neither.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,117
    Jun 2, 2006
    How about you ask the OP what his intention was?
    I've done so.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,745
    29,117
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'd like to know if the Jeffries you mention is the real and actual James J Jeffries that existed and fights Wilder as he was, or some mythological,hypothetical Jeffries that can magically be transformed by modern sports science.Will you please clarify this for us?