Deontay Wilder versus Rocky Marciano

Exactly these kids are pathetic.this spaguetti barely did beat a fat nobody and 4 simpletons got a hard erection

 

How exactly do you see Marciano pulling this one off?

 

It's the same way I'd expect Golovkin to beat Julio Cesar Chavez.

I'd expect Bivol to beat Terry Norris.

I'd expect Lomachenko to beat Chang.

 

I did not any prediction about rocky vs wilder but is laughable like a few guys specially certain ******ed1985 got so excited because wilder won a fight(with a lot of problems and he was knocked out on his feet,the bell saved him) against a fat guy that is a nobody in history and they act like if he was Ali beating foreman or clay beating sonny liston,and saying that he is the hardest puncher ever and he have fought a bunch of garbage!! i guarantee you that if wilder beats joshua then clown 1985 will rate wilder in a top 10 hw ever.simply pathetic.like kids after watching an action film

 

Does anyone ever get a "hard erection" during boxing?

That statement is quite strange as well, it's like saying someone got a painful sore. Or a clever moment of intelligence. A dark blackout. A multi coloured rainbow.

The former is more than implied by the latter.

Are there none hard erections? I tell you what this reminds me of the logic puzzle about mathematicians and plumbers.

If my boiler breaks and someone comes round to fix it, is the person more likely to be

A) a mathematician
Or
B) a mathematician and a plumber.

Simple set theory tells us that everyone who is a mathematician and a plumber must be a mathematician. But not every mathematician must be a mathematician and a plumber.

Therefore the answer is A) a mathematician.

Crazy how maths works right?

 

Wilder is not and will never be, that Chavez, Bivol, or Lomachenko of the heavyweight division!

 

Yeah.they are the first ones

 

You can say that about any of the guys I mentioned. You can say Golovkin will never be the Chavez. Or Bivol will never the Norris. Or Lomachenko will never be the Chang. But despite all of that does it mean I should favour the latter over the former?

Bivol might lose against Kovalev, then Stevenson and retire never being as good as he is right now, but even if that happened would I ever pick Terry Norris to beat him? I'd concede that Norris is the greater fighter and better p4p, but with a 20 pounds advantage in weight and a huge advantage in reach and height is be confident that Bivol could do the job.

 

I'm gonna assume English is not your first language.

Hablo espanol.

 

Really ?then you should to start for writing the word español correctly lol

 

My phone doesn't have the tilde symbol.

Your English is probably better than my Spanish though. Google translate often makes errors in syntax I find.

So like i would probably say

Tus Ingles es mejor a de mi Espanol en mi opinion.

But that's from my understanding, which isn't yet 100% and with none of the correct accents. Like El and El lol, the and he.

 

Give over, his talk of hard erections as sent him over the edge.........

 

If Wilder had showed something of an effective jab in the Ortiz fight then I would probably favor him over Marciano. The only thing he has is a wild thundering right hand that's not very accurate. Marciano would have a much easier time to get in on Wilder and hurt him bad then the other way around, imo. Nevertheless Marciano more than likely never felt that kind of power before (99% certain) so it would be interesting to see how he would deal with it. Wilder has a fairly reasonable punchers chance.

 

I'll take Rocky, who would come into the ring at 190...remember Wilder is 214, not that huge a weight differential.

 

I wouldn't say deontay has a glass jaw, deontay took some huge shots from king kong yesterday and still came through for the knock out