Deontay Wilder vs Dillian Whyte, who takes it?

Whyte is horribly over rated by some, just because he beat Joshua in the amateurs and wobbled him in their fight. He's technically poor, often out of shape and gassed badly against Joshua.

Wilder likely knocks him out in the 2nd half of the fight.

 

I don't think so,have you seen Whyte since his loss to AJ?maybe it's the left shoulder still or the effects of his loss to AJ,he fought the fight of his life that night against AJ and looked good but AJ impressed me how he calmed himself down and trusted in his boxing skills and in the end when it came the KO was brutal.
Unless Whyte can get back to how he were then Wilder wins easy.

 

Erm I'll answer it then,no idea mate?

 

Lean slightly towards Wilder. But Whyte would be very game. Longer it goes the more it favors Wilder. Early rounds are very dangerous for Wilder.

 

Depends if Whyte will pass the test that Chisora will give him. He could be a good contender for Wilder. Otherwise Wilder by KO.

 

Whytes best win is Allen ,soon to be a very in shape Chisora . Going 7 rnds with Joshua is better than anything Stiverne has ever done (remind you he lost to a guy under Allen in reality ) see you lack the common sense necessary to engage me bc we are not comparing resumes we are comparing the fighters and Whyte can easily k.o Wilder as well.

You are probably one of these posters who also underate Ortiz now bc he went 12 with Scott after hyping him up to ridiculous levels bc you actually don't know how to rate a fighter beyond resume . When you can't see skills themselves you are a lost cause which is the case with you

Can you HEAR me now ??????lol .

 

Siarhei Petrovich Liakhovich is better than Allen. Dave Allen is just a guy who see in a boxersize class.

Whyte would not be any more dangerous than Spilka was. He was more awkward and much better conditioned . Wilder sent him away on a stretcher.

 

Wilder's packing glass in that mandible, and any decent fighter could shatter it if he gets a good punch in. Of course, that's why Wilder's management doesn't put him in with decent fighters.

 

Fighters best wins don't mean anything, when has that ever made any difference in anything what so ever ?

If you can tell me one single instance any fighters best win meant anything I'll bow down to you on YouTube naked

 

Then why does fighters like Klitchko and Joshua seek Allen out for sparring if hes in boxercise classes you knuckle head? lol

Spzilka does not hit hard yet is less dangerous than the more polished ,hard hitting Whyte ? The fact Spzilka pressed Wilder before the k.o should wake you up to the nonsense you are saying .

 

Kell Brooks credibility is entirely based off one win.

Wilder had a joke resume before he fought Stiverne. He was mocked and ridiculed because he didn't have a good win.

How is one guy better than the other if wins don't mean anything Brian Nelison .

 

Spitska was moving all over the place and was hard to pin down and attacked from an awkward southpaw stance. Whyle is just a sitting duck. I thought he was going to die in the first few rounds against AJ. You can't be hittable against Wilder.
He'll pop your bonk off.

 

For boxersize

 

Whyte moves all over and can switch too south paw too,which makes him more dangerous ,comes from a strong boxing amateur pedigree and is all around better than Spzilka,the fact he did take Joshua punches also shows Wilder will have his hands full and will get hit off balance the whole fight even if he wins because he doesnt have Joshuas slip punch style or leg distribution balance ,you simply don't know what you are talking about.

 

Even the newbies school Dino, lol