Basically, this. Klitschko was a technical boxer who had a superb jab and system built around it. Wilder is the guy who went to pieces when Gerald Washington popped him with the jab a few times. Obviously he has a chance with his atomic right hand but personally I think he can telegraph it and Wlad is a top operator that will walk Wilder onto his own counter first.
You have several statements that betray a great bias Sahund. First off, whether someones takes a punch is not a fact, it is a judgement. Next it is highly implausible that Fury landed a "one in a million shot". Wilder has much less boxing experience & skill, but I hope you would recognize that if anyone dismissed any blow of his as extremelt improbable: we would be highly biased. Next you mention Wlad at his worse. But the match up is supposed to be both at their peak. That is as unfair as if I matched Wilder in an MMA fight with either Kllitchko-since he never did that. Wlad supposedly collapsing from "wind punches" is another tall tale. All your knowledge & credibility is compromised when you become as an extreme fanboy as possible because you emotionally identify with one fighter. Whether of nationalistic reasons or anti-foreign bias, I do not know. But if you are honest with yourself you would do anything to justify your a priori preferences & conclusions.
Don’t insult Peter “Cocoon of horror” McNeeley by comparing him to Wilder. Btw...Peter “Hurricane” McNeeley VS Deontay “Windmill” Wilder... who you got winning this barn burner and how?