Dereck Chisora will be stylistically all wrong for Luis Ortiz if they fought now?

Whyte, Yoka and Parker aren't being called the ultimate 'boogeymen' of the heavyweight division like Ortiz is. Nor are they considered for the most part, 'murderous' or great POWER PUNCHERS. If they are, then I'd massively disagree and also consider their power to not be that high.

Ortiz is the one being overrated. Hence, to fulfill the standard set by majority of the people, particularly Wilder and Ortiz fans, Ortiz is the one who has to be dropping and keeping clowns like Dave Allen to the canvas for a 10 count in super quick time and not go 7 rounds without even scoring a single knockdown. Otherwise, his power is not fulfilling the standard that has been set by the vast majority in the boxing community.

If you guys don't enjoy seeing Ortiz's punching power being exposed and criticized, then avoid rating his power and him as a boxer, above what he deserves. He hasn't proven to be this terrifying 'boogeyman' or this specially 'monstrous' puncher that many seem to claim in the boxing community.

 

Fury isn't called some 'murderous' puncher like Ortiz is. So he isn't expected to KO his opponents like Ortiz is. However, I agree about Fury being wrong in lying about KO'ing his opponents and not even attempting it.

My point was that Fury is a superior heavyweight than Ortiz. It had absolutely nothing to do with punching power.

 

My point is, if you can't even drop someone like Dave Allen as Luis Ortiz couldn't. Then you aren't going to stop / KO a far superior heavyweight in Dereck Chisora who is arguably even more durable.

And at this point in Luis Ortiz's career, a KO is the only way he could win fights. Considering he is at an old age where he lacks stamina to last the full 12 rounds (perfectly understandable and reasonable). And if Ortiz doesn't have the power to KO (I mean a literal definition of a KO) someone, such as Dereck Chisora, then he can't beat them because he is going to fade down the stretch in the later rounds and would either lose a decision or get stopped from fatigue.

Ortiz would suffer a similar fate against Chisora as Takam did.

 

Whether they've had problems getting fights or not is totally irrelevant to the point I'm making. My point still stands, that they aren't being rated as some ultimate boogeyman or some monstrous or great puncher like Ortiz is. Which is why, I'm not criticizing their power or them as boxers as I'm criticizing Ortiz. Simply because, they aren't being overrated.

When one is being called a 'boogeyman' of the heavyweight division with monstrous power like Ortiz, then I'm going to hold him to that standard. And whilst holding him to that standard, he should be expected to totally blast away clowns like Dave Allen in super quick time by dropping them to the canvas for the 10 count. If he isn't fulfilling this feat, then he doesn't qualify as this boogeyman or monstrous power puncher.

And more precisely, if people claim Ortiz would KO or even stop someone like Dereck Chisora, but Ortiz fails to even drop a far inferior heavyweight in Dave Allen who is arguably even less durable than Chisora, than we have to question his chances severely against Chisora. And it's fair to deduce he won't have much of a chance at winning by KO / stoppage against Chisora if he couldn't cleanly KO Dave Allen in 7 rounds. And KO is the only way Ortiz can win in his career right now.

And I see no evidence at all that Ortiz hits harder than Whyte. If Ortiz hit harder than Whyte, then he would've cleanly and brutally KO'ed Dave Allen by dropping him to the canvas for the 10 count. Especially since Whyte fought, beat and damaged Dave Allen before Ortiz fought Allen. Yet, Ortiz fought Whyte's left over who was more faded and damaged when he fought Ortiz than when he fought Whyte. Yet, Ortiz is unable to do a better job on Whyte's leftover in Allen by also needing all the rounds and by also failing to score a single knockdown in 7 rounds.

That's not evidence of Ortiz being a more powerful puncher.

I'll tell you who hits harder than Whyte or Ortiz. JOHAN DUHAUPAS! Wanna know why? Because Duhaupas cleanly, brutally and concussively KO'ed a previously undefeated version of Robert Helenius who trained properly.

Meanwhile, Whyte failed to KO Robert Helenius after already being damaged from his KO loss to Duhaupas, who by the way, didn't even have a complete training camp as he did against Duhaupas.

Duhaupas cleanly KO'ed a previously undefeated version of an opponent which Whyte later couldn't KO at short notice with an incomplete training camp.

Meanwhile, Ortiz failed to cleanly KO Whyte's leftover after Whyte already beat him and damaged him.

So what's more impressive?

Duhaupas > Whyte = Ortiz in the punching power department.

If Ortiz hit as hard you folks claim, he should've done to Allen what Duhaupas did to Robert Helenius. But of course, Ortiz is the king of standing and misleading and questionable stoppages. I've yet to see a single clean or concussive KO by Ortiz against a half decent opponent. His KO percentage is highly misleading!