Dereck Chisora will NOT be banned by the Boxing Board

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by The Genius, Feb 25, 2012.


  1. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    Chisora ha been heavily fined for his actions in Germany last week.

    £33,000 for the slap
    £16,500 for spitting at Wlad.
    £16,500 for the brawl with Haye.

    This is £66,000 in total. Robert Smith and the board will view this as fair punishment. He may receive a 6 month banned suspended for 2 years or something like that. Either way he will not be out of action for too long.

    He'll fight the winner of Price/Sexton by the end of the year, or maybe Martin Rogan.
     
  2. dftaylor

    dftaylor Writer, fanatic Full Member

    20,730
    1
    May 7, 2010
    What? The hearing's not till next week or something.
     
  3. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    Sorry. The fines are from the WBC and German Boxing Federation. Although I believe the BBBoC have some involvement.
     
  4. WalletInspector

    WalletInspector Obsessed with Boxing banned

    21,194
    2
    Jan 1, 2010
    Frank: "the German Federation have deducted £66,000 of his purse pending a hearing."
     
  5. The Genius

    The Genius Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,173
    43
    Dec 16, 2011
    Dereck has been punished for his previous offences. He may get a tiny ban, which along with fines will be appropriate. Chisora will not be banned for a year.
     
  6. Realistically though a six month ban in boxing is absolutely nothing these days.

    It's not as if he'd have had three fights in that spell, he'd probably have had one towards the end of the ban and be back in the gym preparing for his next bout.

    Anything short of a year is meaningless.
     
  7. Pecsaetan

    Pecsaetan It's egg in soup! Full Member

    2,162
    1
    Nov 6, 2009
    The problem that the BBBoC will have is that if they try and do anything substantial it'll probably get very legally messy.
     
  8. nick6

    nick6 Active Member Full Member

    873
    1
    Feb 19, 2011
    i think that's fair 66k is a lot of money to take off someone. Should just leave it at that or give him a 6 month ban suspended for 2 years or what ever it is to stop him doing it again and tell him hes a very naught boy
     
  9. slip&counter

    slip&counter Gimme some X's and O's Full Member

    24,813
    20
    Jul 23, 2008
    The irony of the WBC fining people. Boxing is really a mess.
     
  10. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    Didn't the WBC drop Arreola from there rankings becuase he swore at the press conference, but kept Floyd as their champion after he was found guilty of battering a woman?
     
  11. I think they've got a case in fairness.

    It could be argued that he brought the sport into disrepute. A fine is the much easier, and to be honest more logical conclusion.

    Agreed.

    Hit him in the pocket and tell him to behave.

    :yep
     
  12. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    The WBC shouldn't be able to fine people. Crooks.
     
  13. Pad-Man

    Pad-Man ***Team England*** Full Member

    89
    0
    Sep 24, 2011
    The WBC only sanction fights, they are not a governing body. Only the national governing body that issued the license should be able to deduct from purses, which in this case is BBBoC. The German boxing body can deduct as it was on their turf but even still the BBBoC should have input. What I am not for is the WBC over-riding national bodies, who the **** are they to do that?
     
  14. ishy

    ishy Loyal Member Full Member

    44,755
    8
    Mar 9, 2008
  15. I'm not for the WBC being in existence.

    What does ''sanctioning'' a fight actually mean?

    A genuine question btw - if they don't ''sanction'' it, the fight would probably happen anyway, right?