Development of fisticuffs in Russia

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by GlaukosTheHammer, Dec 10, 2017.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,540
    28,781
    Jun 2, 2006
    Well I'm not a historian, just another fan.As I said Pollack is the guy to read on the subject of Johnson.
     
  2. GlaukosTheHammer

    GlaukosTheHammer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,856
    2,074
    Nov 7, 2017
    Bit pricey for the pair, it'll have to wait for the end of the season, but I appreciate it.

    I don't mean to be a dick, but is there a reason why you're not posting the relevant info found in his books?
     
  3. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,540
    28,781
    Jun 2, 2006
    Its spread all over the two volumes mate,you might find some of it in my early posts.
    BTW I have Bells Boxiana that has quite a lot about the bareknuckle era in it.
     
  4. GlaukosTheHammer

    GlaukosTheHammer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,856
    2,074
    Nov 7, 2017
    :lol: Trust me I get it, I was just making sure if I go through the bother it won't be a repost.
     
  5. GlaukosTheHammer

    GlaukosTheHammer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,856
    2,074
    Nov 7, 2017
    Bumping because it came up recently, but McVey I am curious, if Pollack is the man for Johnson and that's why Vladimir must be mistaken would finding the man for Russian history suffice, in your opinion?

    It's just that it isn't often I'm told a boxing historian is more respected than a geopolitical historian and I wonder if Pollack actually did good research in Russia as it's not easy and he's not Russian.

    I feel like I accepted your answer a bit early. Probably just wanted to get them books, which I've not yet mostly because, I'm sure you know, color champs are probably the hardest subject to try to research in boxing. More walls than ancient no doubt.
     
  6. escudo

    escudo Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,298
    4,628
    May 13, 2014
  7. GlaukosTheHammer

    GlaukosTheHammer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,856
    2,074
    Nov 7, 2017
    @Senya13 http://www.libma.ru/sport/sovremennyi_boks/p2.php


    I found it trying to track down the Gustav chronicle online. I can't say that it's even worth translating, I can't say how valuable or honest the information is. I was just very impressed with what google translated juxtaposed to what I had already known going in. Anything you're willing to do with it would be very much appreciated, I think by much of the forum.

    This was one of my more well liked threads. I think there is a real and strong interest in the subject.
     
  8. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,925
    2,387
    Jul 11, 2005
    Gustyn chronicle is dated in early 1600s, not 990 as the article says. As wiki says about it, the early part of the chronicle is noted for mistakes and distortions.
    Nestor's list is dated 1550-1560, not 1069.

    "The Sotskys and the Counts" "The names of the Sotskys and the Tithes"
    Sotskiy = Hundreth (as in the leader of a group of a hundred of people), counts/tithes=tenth (leader of a group of ten people).

    I have no idea who the author of the book (the link is giving the contents of) is. Bibliography ( http://www.libma.ru/sport/sovremennyi_boks/p10.php ) doesn't list any serious historical sources, only books on sports in general and boxing in particular.
     
  9. GlaukosTheHammer

    GlaukosTheHammer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,856
    2,074
    Nov 7, 2017

    You reckon too many wrongs to look into any farther?
     
  10. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,925
    2,387
    Jul 11, 2005
    No. I'm just saying this particular book (the link is leading to) is not a source I'd reference if I were writing on the subject. I'd have gone for the original sources listed in bibliography, see their bibliography lists, maybe they have better references (to original historical manuscripts or to books/articles written by historians).
     
    GlaukosTheHammer likes this.
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,540
    28,781
    Jun 2, 2006
    Please name the promoter of this supposed fight , the terms of it, and the source for your information.
     
  12. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,341
    Jun 29, 2007
    Johnson who pulled out of a signed contract to meet Sam Langford in the UK ( 1909 ), did not want to risk his title.

    It takes two parties to make a boxing match. Johnson preferred easier marks, such as Jim Battling Johnson, whom he drew in Paris 1913.

    Something tells me Jack Johnson made a lot less in the Jim Battling Johnson fight in comparison to the offers to meet Langford, Jeanette or McVey.

    Johnson loved money, so why not make some vs. Langford, McVey, or Jeannette?
     
  13. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,540
    28,781
    Jun 2, 2006
    Johnson was not champion when he signed to fight Langford and when he became champion it became a different ball-game ,one in which he didn't want to defend his title for a derisory sum of £3000! I have many times provided proof that Johnson signed to fight Jeannette x2 ,New York ,Langford and McVey, Australia, verified in Pollack's biography of Johnson.I also showed what the terms were and why the fights did not happen I have also shown that Joe Woodman ,Langford's manager could not come up with the necessary cash bond after both he and Johnson had made an agreement to fight in the US this is verifies in Clay Moyle's biography of Langford.

    You on the other hand have produced nothing ,despite repeated requests by me for you to provide primary sourced details of $30,000 offers for Johnson to defend his title against Jeannette,Langford ,McVey , anywhere in the world that he declined. So," Mr Blocked Toilet" keep making your hate posts, nobody gives them any credence.
    Perhaps we might now return to the thread and say good bye to your hate posts?
     
  14. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,341
    Jun 29, 2007
    STOP THE BS. With you its the same &ht, different toilet. You spin fools no one.

    Johnson was the lineal champion in 1909; he pulled out of a signed deal to meet Langford. If you sign a contract, your obligated to do so. Johnson simply kept pushing the amount up. He wasn't serious about taking any of these fights.

    Bottom line: Johnson did not honor the deal, no fight was final with Johnson, even when he signed for it until he entered the ring. His manager called Johnson out on a topic like this.

    Now if you have the purse amount for Johnson's dubious draw vs. Jim Battling Johnson, post it here. My hunch is the amount isn't one if his best. As you know the French booed Johnson's effort and tried to strip away his title.
     
  15. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,540
    28,781
    Jun 2, 2006
    Listen stupid, Johnson signed to fight Langford in November 1908 before he became champion.
    Johnson signed to fight both Langford,and McVey in Australia ,and the promoter pulled out of the deal.There is simply no way you can get around that fact!

    Once again you have it ass about face. The French tried to strip Johnson before he defended against Battling Jim,the Langford v Jeannette fight for the French recognized version of the title took place the day after the Johnson v Johnson defence,and the public booed the Johnson fight because of the lack of action after the early rounds ,which was entirely understandable given that Johnson had fractured his radius bone in the 3rd round.
    ps. A couple of months later the French stripped Langford of his phoney title and once against recognized Johnson as the true champion.
    Now would you like to explain how your deranged hate Johnson posts have any connection with the development of boxing in Russia you sad,sorry fool!