The analogy is in the height and reach disparity. **** me, do you need help to dress yourself too? atsch
Perhaps but I don't need help realizing you're a moron. :good Speaking of which how is your ranking in the MMA prediction league coming? What? Oh that's right. You don't know what you're talking about. Sure Nate is an excellent fighter but when you go around spouting moronic nonsense about absolute resolutions without supporting your claims it marks you for a braggart and a fool and should be branded as such. Come back when the fight is made and put your avatar on the line if you have the balls for it.
Are you also one of the dumb ****s who needs everything explained to them. Not only is the physical discrepancy between Frankie "The Ant" Edgar and Nate Diaz greater than it was for DLH & Poochiao, unless your level of ******ation is even higher than I fear, surely you can work out that unlike DLH, Nate Diaz isn't long past his prime. Lift your game, stupid. :-(
You're the god damn idiot that thinks Duran and Hearns is a better comparison, and you tell me to lift my game? :rofl Frankie Edgar will have a huge speed and footwork advantage over Diaz. Much like Pacquiao had over Oscar. Are you telling me Duran had a considerable speed and footwork advantage he should have used to take advantage of the bigger slower Hearns? Oh wait, you must be thinking about Diaz' crushing power. With 3 ko's in 23 wins, how did I miss that? It's only logical to think that Diaz' blows would have a similar impact on Edgar as Hearn's punches did against Duran. Thinking Edgar could have a chance at taking Diaz' punches the way Pacquiao took De la Hoya's is insane. It's hilarious that you actually think you are making good points in this thread. Kerrigan, I think you've been selling yourself short. You are a way bigger joke than your avatar suggests.
i do hate to say it, but frankie has a good shot at out-pointing diaz...though, edgar does seem to get himself in trouble easily, and diaz won't wind like maynard
Where is your photo, you no doubt, ugly as sin, *******. How many times does someone have to point out to you about size mismatches, before it seeps through your thick skull and glass jaw?
A good portion of the mma forum was sporting my photo a few months ago. I'm sorry you missed it. Until you made this post, I didn't think your avatar was really you. I apologize, I didn't know you were really that ****ed up. Just looking like you is enough **** to go through without someone like me reminding you of how you look. Please, forget I said anything. You think that comparing a flat footed, light hitting, volume puncher with Hearns is more valid because Diaz is an inch taller than Oscar? That still doesn't change the fact that Edgar is closer to being an mma version of Pacquiao than he is an mma version of Duran. If you are too stupid to see that, so be it.
Defense? What defense? What the hell was I defending? It was more of an offensive post. Kerrigan stupidly compared Edgar and Diaz as though it was some sort of Hearns vs Duran type of fight. Diaz is nothing like Hearns outside of being an inch shorter. Edgar is nothing like Duran excluding height. Look at their styles.
Obviously you took down your photo because of the terrible response you understandably drew. Edgar will have no answer to Diaz, none. And you are too clueless to see it.