Dick Tiger vs. Nino Benvenuti on Youtube - massively underappreciated performance

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by My2Sense, Dec 27, 2009.


Page 1 of 2
  1. My2Sense

    My2Sense Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,935
    92
    Aug 21, 2008
    [yt]4fy4Z-BbAts[/yt]
    [yt]wn2xmIXhkt4[/yt]
    [yt]-yLwJPhZ5e0[/yt]
    [yt]hbKMFczrrIM[/yt]

    IMO this fight one of the most underappreciated performances by any fighter ever. It's the kind of win that normally leaves a lasting imprint on the minds of boxing fans and seals a fighter's legacy as an ATG. In its own time, it was every bit the equivalent of Hopkins-Pavlik - an ancient ex-MW champ capping his legacy with a shocking, one-sided win over his hot young successor as champ. Given that Benvenuti has since gone down as a great champion and HOFer in his own right, this result should've gained even greater stature over time, but instead the opposite has happened: it's been virtually forgotten. I simply don't hear anyway talk about it anymore - even when Tiger is brought up (which actually isn't often outside of this site) this fight and its significance are often overlooked.

    Expanding on my Hopkins-Pavlik parallel, here is the background of this fight:
    Tiger had moved up to 175 after losing his MW title on hotly disputed decision to Emile Griffith (as Hopkins did after losing to Taylor), and upset Jose Torres to win the LHW title (as Hopkins did vs. Tarver). Meanwhile, Benvenuti had won the MW title by beating Tiger's conqueror Griffith (as Pavlik did to Taylor). Tiger defended his LHW title a couple of times, but then lost it on a crushing KO to Bob Foster. That KO loss, plus his age (he was around 40) appeared to have taken a toll on Tiger, as he was down twice in his next fight against fringe contender Frankie DePaula. Meanwhile, Benvenuti was looking to break into the light-heavy ranks and eyeing an eventual megafight with Foster (I suppose similar to how Pavlik was looking ahead to possible big fights with Calzaghe or other super-middles/light-heavies), and he chose this old, weary ex-champ as a stepping stone toward that goal. Benvenuti was heavily favored to win (as Pavlik was over Hopkins), but Tiger surprised him and the boxing world as a whole by completely shutting him down and schooling him (as Hops did to Pavlik). This fight not only was a stinging blow to Benvenuti's reputation (at least for the time being, anyway), but it brought his LHW campaign to a screeching halt. To his credit, Benvenuti did offer Tiger a shot at his MW title afterward, but Tiger declined it on the grounds that he didn't believe he could make 160 anymore.

    My reason for focusing so much on a Tiger/Hopkins parallel is this: Why is it that Hopkins' upset win was hailed as something of a defining moment for him, while Tiger's win (under very similar circumstances and against an even more accomplished and heralded opponent) is so widely overlooked today?
     
    My2Sense, Dec 27, 2009
    My2Sense, Dec 27, 2009
    #1
  2. Bioyhh

    Bioyhh Riot Dog Full Member

    170
    0
    Dec 2, 2009
    It's just one of those curiosities of fickle history. As you say, Dick Tiger's name and career just doesn't resonate much among more casual fans of boxing. Some athletes just get overlooked, for numerous reasons. But you're right: this was a great performance by Tiger. And that's one of the beautiful things about boxing: the rich history of the sport allows enthusiasts to discover overlooked gems like this.
     
    Bioyhh, Dec 28, 2009
    Bioyhh, Dec 28, 2009
    #2
  3. Rise Above

    Rise Above IBHOF elector Full Member

    8,038
    39
    Sep 20, 2007
    I havent seen this fight before. Will watch it now.
     
    Rise Above, Dec 28, 2009
    Rise Above, Dec 28, 2009
    #3
  4. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,112
    10,526
    Jul 28, 2009
    Thanks for posting this. :good
     
    Boxed Ears, Dec 28, 2009
    Boxed Ears, Dec 28, 2009
    #4
  5. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    I think the worst knock against Benvenuti was that he was guilty of being somewhat erratic. I don't know how things would have been any different if the middleweight title was on the line...Benvenuti may have redeemed himself as he did on other occasions after losing to a guy. I'm not really sure. There's a slight parallel here between this fight and SSR'S loss to another tiger..Ralph Tiger Jones...I think most people who hold Sugar in high regard would have bet that he would have avenged that loss with the title on the line..maybe Nino would have too against Dick Tiger..again, I'm not sure.
     
    red cobra, Dec 28, 2009
    red cobra, Dec 28, 2009
    #5
  6. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    He looks really bad against Tiger here, though. Tiger's just out-timing him, out-levelling him constantly. He changes up his approach, but it's not the approach that's faulty, it's sharpness and intensity in which Dick Tiger dwarfs him in this match.
     
    Shake, Dec 28, 2009
    Shake, Dec 28, 2009
    #6
  7. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    Benvenuti was as inconsistent as Toney, after brecoming champ.Couldn't be relied on to give a good performance at all.


    That said i agree, this was a mighty performance from Tiger and though Nino may have been out of sorts, he was far better than someone like Pavlik
     
    Mantequilla, Dec 28, 2009
    Mantequilla, Dec 28, 2009
    #7
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,087
    Mar 21, 2007

    Which fighters from the last 5 years do you admire the most Mantequilla?
     
    McGrain, Dec 28, 2009
    McGrain, Dec 28, 2009
    #8
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,087
    Mar 21, 2007
    Agree with everything in the OP My2Sense.
     
    McGrain, Dec 28, 2009
    McGrain, Dec 28, 2009
    #9
  10. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,558
    Jul 28, 2004
    A great performance by Tiger...inconsistancy on Nino's part or not..I still say there's a parallel with SRR vs. Ralph Tiger Jones...and the "Tiger" part is just coincidental.
     
    red cobra, Dec 28, 2009
    red cobra, Dec 28, 2009
    #10
  11. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    My2Sense; good thread, and looking forward to watching this, obviously I was aware of the win before but hadn't thought about it like that, seems a very valid standpoint.
     
    Flea Man, Dec 28, 2009
    Flea Man, Dec 28, 2009
    #11
  12. Mantequilla

    Mantequilla Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,964
    78
    Aug 26, 2004
    As in fighters that established themselves from then on, or still counting Hopkins/Mosley/Mayweather and co...


    I admire and enjoy loads of active fighters to be honest, even ones i don't/didn't think were any good.If i wasn't getting anything out of most fights i wouldn't be watching the sport anymore.

    Pac, Marquez and Calzaghe would probably be my most highly rated fighters that a good number of defining fights in that time period.Hopkins too of course if we can still count him.

    As for fighters who have stepped into world class in the past five years or are still really carving a legacy...i got to say not many have made much of an impact talent-wise...certainly not a lot of the ones the usual hype was telling me i should be impressed with...LAcy,Cotto,Haye,Margarito, Pavlik,taylor, Dawson...meh...lots to enjoy watching there but not highly rated by me.Froch i've always thought was very mediocre, Witter likewise.I liked Hatton at one point actually, but since the Kostya fight he's proven to be one of the worst world level British champs i've ever seen.Marquez and vasquez trilogy was awesome, but i was never a big fan of either.Solid fighters though.

    I've got a soft spot for Nishioka, but he might not count.Hasegawa is a good fighter and still seems to be improving, but his comp has been poor...the lighterweights in general are a wasteland.I really rate Abraham as a puncher, but not as an overall fighter so far.Mijares was good and promising for a while, though i was wary of him and not as high as fools like Amsterdam.Maybe he'll redeem himself however.Bradley, i like..he's a consummate pro imo, if not the most gifted.
     
    Mantequilla, Dec 28, 2009
    Mantequilla, Dec 28, 2009
    #12
  13. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,467
    Sep 7, 2008
    I also like Bradley, who has shown versatility. I like that.

    This decade at least has cemented certain fighters into the top 50, so has probably not been a waste :good
     
    Flea Man, Dec 28, 2009
    Flea Man, Dec 28, 2009
    #13
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,998
    48,087
    Mar 21, 2007
    That's interesting because I would say you low-balled Joe Calzaghe a little bit - and i'm certainly not his biggest fan.

    Agree with you. Hatton gave us some great nights though. And i'd say that Marquez-Vasquez III is maybe my favourite fight to watch in colour.

    :lol:

    Those were the days.

    Have you had a look at straweight #1 Roman Gonzalez? Interesting prospect I think.
     
    McGrain, Dec 28, 2009
    McGrain, Dec 28, 2009
    #14
  15. Sweet Pea

    Sweet Pea Obsessed with Boxing banned

    27,199
    93
    Dec 26, 2007
    I like Gonzalez as well. He seems very technically sound, compact with his punches, and economical in his approach. Varies his attack up from head to body nicely, and has some cracking left hooks and uppercuts. He's a bit of a plodder, though.

    On a different note, we need to stop de-railing this thread.
     
    Sweet Pea, Dec 28, 2009
    Sweet Pea, Dec 28, 2009
    #15
Page 1 of 2