Did Algieri's Performance against Khan prove how good Pac's victory over him was???

Or how good of a trainer John David Jackson has become?

 

Algieri fought differnetly against Khan so its hard to say styles make fights

 

Depends how good of a victory you think it was.

 

algieri was attacking khan the whole fight. he was not able to do that to pac due to his awkward style and speed. pac is an atg that fights to win with damage so knock downs happen. khan fought like just to reach the final bell and was hurt many times. khan is just not on pac's level. algeiri did improve in his game though and was just as tough which was proven in provodnikov and pac fights. khan over rated with no dominating performance and failed to rematch his defeats.

 

you know why? cause Pac had power and scared algieri, plus Pac is awkward and difficult. Khan has no power and orthodox..

Pac was just more dangerous, more aggressive and had more skills and weapons than Khan. Algieri would've gotten knocked out cold if he would've fought Pac like he fought Khan.

 

Both. Here's a brief take IMO

75/25, Khan overrated/added value to Pac's win.

To me, it showed Algieri is better than most anticipated and that Pac is still a beast. Algieri fought better under Jackson too. But Khan is severely overrated and still clearly beat Algieri, his poor performance just shows how overrated he is.

 

It shows two things

1. Khan chin is weaker then Wlad I mean getting stunned couple of times by a 8 total ko in Chris?


2. It shows pac wasn't a "SHOT" fighter as dumb re****ed pac fans think he started to become a "SHOT" fighter after getting ko by marquez.

 

PAC is still in his prime

 

:happy Praise God someone brought logic to this forum!!!