honest, there are quite a few posters on here that i feel are more knowledgeable and better analysts than what I've seen of some trainers rather have flea or stoney in my corner than lou duva for instance...
That's entirely up to you, and that might be the right choice for you. But I'm sure there are hundreds of fighters out there who had Lou Duva in their corner and were happy they did. Some of them very successful. We shouldn't knock anyone's credentials to be a trainer. And, as JG pointed out, we shouldn't assume we know exactly what is or isn't being communicated in the corner between cornerman and fighter.
good point but to be honest when watching stewart working on hbo, you could clearly see him mentioning details about distance, inside work etc and not to mention you could see him he is very good on the pads and MUCH MORE IMPORTANLY HE PRODUCED FIGHTERS FROM HIS GYM, and didnt just take ready made products who were top of the talent poll
i agree he was a great person, and an inspiration but lou duva, interesting and what fighters did he produce??? or did he just take ready made guys like sweet pea or even golota who were just like dundee's guys top of the talent poll and already successful pros or olympic-world champions in amauter
i agree with you on the 2nd point 100 percent but your first point is shaky because most of those great fighters who didnt work on the pads fought other guys who did not work the pads. so you that point cancels itself out and we are talking about modern times and almost all trainers do pads and about your 2nd point again, advice like "your blowing it son" and you gotta throw combos as generic as it gets
I am a pro scientist, not boxer, but I do box as an amateur many years You may find it odd, but I think there are lots of similarities between boxing coaches and scientific mentors. There are two types of guys. Majority play teachers by paying attention on your mistakes only, who constantly play experts and critisize you. Minority guys are more patient, close their eyes on your mistakes, rather acknowledge every time you do something right. Personally, I prefer working with the second type. By his own admission, AD was the second type: 'critisism is ok, encouragement is better". I guess this interview gives the best opinion about AD: [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHHeYQhxj_M[/ame] Those who advocate mitt work too much - at early stage it can break a fighter. With it, you will produce clones, not unique guys with talent. I seriously doubt ALi and SRL would develop their great talents if they started doing mitt work early. Also, swap mitt routines between Manny and Floyd, would this do any good? I remember Ricky Hatton hired Floyd senior and they did floyd cascades, but it did not help Ricky.
i agree with you about trainers who play expert to much and tell you that your doing everything wrong...i actually have a trainer like that, at first i was fine with it but now its ANNOYING... but who point about mitt work was that it is one of the ways you can if a trainer knows boxing, it is just one of the ways a trainer watching and making detailed comments about a boxer and or a technique is another way you can tell about his knowledge dundee did not do any pad work and again dundee doing commentry on hbo on fights usually only made super general comments "the kid is not jabbing" other ways you can tell if a guy knows how to box him showing a fighter how to do a move or even the trainer working out himself, again there are a million ways of seeing i have yet to see dundee do any of these
Focus mitts are overrated, anyways. Can produce paint by numbers fighters. I refuse to do more then 6 rounds a day. Sparring, bag work, skipping rope, and shadowboxing are all infinitely superior exercises. I never worked with Angie, but I've not heard a bad thing about him. I think a bunch of armchair postulating is disrespectful to an obvious legend. If Leonard gives him credit, if Ali gives him credit, he deserves credit. That is the end of it.
Dose it matter if Dundee ever boxed? Dose it matter if he wasn't a triditional coach? My opinion to both questions is "no". He clearly knew how to get the most out of his boxers. When Ali was blinded in the first Listen fight. He knew it would go away and refused to let him quit. When Hearns built a lead on Leonard. He told him "Your blowing it son". Sometimes it's the little things that matter as much as the big things.
And it's not easy to do. Teddy Atlas, for example, sucks at motivating a fighter. Just, ugh. Don't get me started. You can't just say ****. You have to say the right ****, and the context of your relationship will make it meaningful.
that is not the end of it who taught leonard and ali to box??? someone else? who watched out for the mistakes??? before and after they were great...someone else??? who did dundee produce??? to even win a golden gloves tournament??? yes ali and leonard give him credit...do you ever hear them saying he taught them anything???? so basically it was someone who produced them? it was some else who did pads with them or watched for mistakes they make and dundee gets all the credit like a said he was a great motivator and a good guy but a coach teaches produces fighters, and doesnt just cherry pick the best talent that is already a great boxer because of his connections