Did anyone accept VITALI as the legitimate heavyweight champion when he beat Sanders?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by RAMPAGE0017, Jun 27, 2007.


  1. Gabriel R.

    Gabriel R. New Member Full Member

    90
    0
    Jul 11, 2005
    To me, he was the most convincing of the four title holders at that time. It's a matter of definition if this is the criteria for being the legitimate champion or if it's not. However, I considered him the best in the division, but unfortunately he couldn't prove it often enough. Fights with guys like Rahman, Brewster, Peter or a rematch with Byrd would have been important. So I can well understand if people didn't see him as the legitimate champion.
     
  2. RAMPAGE0017

    RAMPAGE0017 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,624
    16
    May 30, 2007

    I didn't think Peter was that well established at the time.
     
  3. Jaaames

    Jaaames Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,854
    0
    Feb 16, 2006
    It really had nothing to do with the Lennox fight.... Remember, Corrie Sanders had to drop the belt that he took from Wlad in order to fight Vitali.... I think that's why vitali got the ring magazine title...
     
  4. KobeIsGod

    KobeIsGod Who Necks?!? Full Member

    7,318
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    not the undisputed champ but clearly the #1 hw kinda how wlad is seen right now.
     
  5. thesandman

    thesandman Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    5
    Jul 29, 2004
    From end of 01 to end of 04, here are those guys records.



    Vitlay

    Dec 01 - W TKO Ross Purrity
    FEb 02 - W TKO Vaughn Bean
    Nov 02 - W TKO Larry Donald
    Jun 03 - L TKO Lennox Lewis
    Dec 03 - W TKO Kirk Johnson
    April 04 - W TKO Corrie Sanders
    Dec 04 - W TKO Danny Williams

    BYRD

    Aug 01 - W UD David Tua
    June 02 - W TKO Jeff Pegues
    Dec 02 - W UD Evander Holyfield
    Sep 03 - W UD Fres Oquendo
    April 04 - D Andrew Golota
    Nov 04 - W SD Jameel McCline


    Ruiz

    Dec 01 - D Evander Holyfield
    Jul 02 - W DQ Kirk Johnson
    Mar 03 - L UD Roy Jones JR
    Dec 03 - W UD Hasim Rahman
    April 04 - W TKO Fres Oquendo
    Nov 04 - W UD Andrew Golota.



    So quite rightly, Vitlay was about middle of the top 10 before he fought Lewis.

    A loss to him, and win over Kirk Johnson propels you up the rankings????

    Byrd and Ruiz both beat more top 10 rated guys. I don't care how, you have to go on official results.

    They deserved to be ranked at least as high as Vitlay on achievements at that point in time. But those guys certainly didn't rank as high on ability to sell magazines. Why do you think Vitlay shot up the rankings like that?
     
  6. AJAX

    AJAX war sonnen! Full Member

    8,123
    1
    Aug 25, 2006
    It's because how Vitaly beat them. Vitaly destoyed Johnson in 2 rounds when most people at the time thought it would be a close fight.He battered Sanders badly and made Williams do the funky chicken dance a couple times before KOing him badly. when Byrd and Ruiz always won close disputed decisions and had very boring fights.
     
  7. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    That brings up another discussion, altogether;

    When ranking a fighter, do you determine his ranking only by the fighters he has defeated........or..........do you also take into account the manner in which he beat his opponents, as in how decisive the victory was.......????????
     
  8. AJAX

    AJAX war sonnen! Full Member

    8,123
    1
    Aug 25, 2006
    well technically you shouldn't but trying to figure out out how the ABC's come up with rankings is mind boggling at best. So I think this can be taken into account as seeing as there is no structurd point system.
     
  9. Ramshall1

    Ramshall1 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,838
    0
    May 16, 2007
    :thumbsup
     
  10. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    He was a good titleholder, but NEVER the World HW Champion.
     
  11. Asterion

    Asterion Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,459
    20
    Feb 5, 2005

    You obviously have to consider the performance. Result + Performance.

    The Ring does it.

    Vitali deserves much more credit for his win against Kirk Johnson than Ruiz.
     
  12. Heavyrighthand

    Heavyrighthand Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,149
    1,044
    Jan 29, 2005
    I think they do take the manner of the win into account, but then again, in my personal opinion, that can make the rankings too subjective and a matter of personal opinion, which it should not be. I think they should make the ranking determination guidelines as far removed form personal opinion, as possible. It will obviously be somewhat speculative, but it shoud be as concrete/cut and dried, as they can make it.
     
  13. thesandman

    thesandman Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    5
    Jul 29, 2004
    WHOOOAAAA back there.

    Johnson weighed 238 against Ruiz.

    He weighed 260 against Vitlay :-(


    If you want to start playing that game, then Ruiz deserves more credit IMO. Even though it was bogus the way he got the DQ, Johnson was a frickin whale against Vitlay.
     
  14. AJAX

    AJAX war sonnen! Full Member

    8,123
    1
    Aug 25, 2006
    yes, but he's KO'd in round 2 so stamina wasn't the factor
     
  15. thesandman

    thesandman Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,606
    5
    Jul 29, 2004
    I'm not talking about stamina.

    I'm talking about how fat he was. How little preparation he'd obviously put in.

    How much he was actually prepared to TRY. Coming in to fight in that shape just shows that he basically just rocked up for the paycheck, with no intention of trying to win.

    You seriously think that all being 260 effects is stamina????? How about speed, mobility etc?

    ****, how could vitlay miss him at that weight?