Did chris john really beat juan manuela marquez??

I fully agree about this statement. Kind of like Whitaker vs Chavez in that regard. :yep

(You know I had to throw that in there :hey)

 

JMM said that CJ didn't win more than 3 rounds puto!:rofl

But hell, we already know reading comprehension is not one of your strong points by a long shot.

 

How about a round by round account with specifics and details johnco?:yep

Lets see you engage in real discussion for once and show us that you are not really talking out of your ass, even though thats what you usually do. :rofl

Come one homie, lets see it, put yourself on the line for reals. :hey

 

it was close, but jmm clearly won. john a very good difficult fighter, but got a hometown gift win. john did not beat jmm and if they had a rematch jmm kicks his ass without a question

 

This analogy is flawed from the very beginning and on many points. Pac-MAB2 is waaaay more conclusive than JMM-John. John was nowhere near survival mode at any point of the fight. And MAB is not fighting on a foreign soil infamous for home cooking as Indonesia. Knowing that, the highly regarded JMM should have gone out of his shell with guns blazing, knowing he's deep in enemy territory. He did not. He fought in spurts that were close. For his caliber, JMM underperformed and was underwhelming, plain and simple. He was not able to impress even a single judge. As a P4P fighter, much was expected, but he did not deliver, esp. that he knew he must because he's on vaunted hostile grounds..

 

Is that you in your avatar?

 

on paper John won but JMM was robbed

10 rounds to 2

and even if you were to give the only 2 close rounds in that fight to John and included the point deductions, it would be 6-4 for JMM at worse.

 

The Independent British Review?

Scott Mallon back when JMM-John was fought, was a correspondent for the website "The Sweet Science".....

......if you think Mallon is a neutral writer on the matter.....Mallon basically writes and covers the Asian boxing scene.....so its no suprise that he'd be pro Chris John.

The bottom line is that most people in this forum never saw the JMM-John fight and cant opiniate on the matter.....yourself included Harrison.


If in fact Harrison is Johnco.......though Johnco criticized JMM many times for losing to Chris john.......Johnco admitted many times not to have seen the fight for himself.......

......he relied on the point of view of writers like Scott Malllon!:rofl:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Correction, thats 8-4 not 6-4.

Now if you could only admit that on paper Pac won but JMM was robbed, you'd be on to something!

 

Scott Mallon has a strong southeast Asia bias have to take a grain of salt whenever he writes about Indonesian and Thailand fighters.

Include the low blow deductions 6-4.

Also remind us what your scorecard was for DLH/Tito and JCC/Whitaker.

 

Why, did it punch some obscure Laker Center between the legs?

 

It tried but it missed!

.......could'nt be you I guess.....the kid looks alot smarter than you post!:tong