Did Cotto quit against Margarito?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mexican legend, Oct 28, 2008.


  1. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004

    Going up to 4th and 5th weight classes not risk?


    He offered Margo a fight. Arum was keeping Cotto away from Floyd. Margos uppercuts killed Cotto, Floyds would be worse.
     
  2. roadkill barbie

    roadkill barbie Active Member Full Member

    544
    0
    Jul 17, 2008
    he just had nothing left- he was obviously at the point where the only thing left was to risk his brain as well as his endurance which was already gone,,,sometimes it happens- I mean you could argue just as validly that gerald mclellan quit against nigel benn couldnt you- but these are not immortals and just because they have nothing left to gain but serious KTFO damage they still gave their all,,,no he didnt quit
     
  3. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    PS: If you check the judges' scorecards, with the 10-8 (possibly 10-7) round for Cotto taking a knee(s), he had already lost the fight on points anyway. He could not have won without a KO, that's a fact.
     
  4. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    It's not quitting when you have nothing physically left to give. Why dont you get that? :huh
     
  5. kartog

    kartog Agent Smith Full Member

    3,975
    84
    Sep 8, 2006
    You could say the same thing with Izzy the first time he fought Rafa. Didn't make him quit the second and third times against Rafa though.
     
  6. Stella Fella

    Stella Fella Member Full Member

    180
    0
    Sep 8, 2008
    I wouldn't say he quit not in a Sam Peter sence anyway. By taking the knee he was avoiding the KO, Smart fighting IMO. Technically his corner retired him. There was nothing more Cotto could do, He turned up! The first 5 where a masterclass. Both fighters were on form.
     
  7. Bill Butcher

    Bill Butcher Erik`El Terrible`Morales Full Member

    28,518
    82
    Sep 3, 2007
    It depends how you look at it...I voted yes but I dont see Cotto as a quitter.

    I thought Cotto showed great heart by continuing & trying even when he was badly gassed but after the 1st KD Cotto walks away backwards & drops down himself, he does beat the count but is looking at his corner just before it gets stopped & you just KNOW he is thinking `please throw that ****ing towel you pricks, Im done here.`

    I dont see him as a quitter but technically he did kind of quit. He fought a good fight but I was cheering when he lost as I like Margarito better & would support AM in the rematch aswell. Ive always thought Cotto was a tad overrated & I used to laugh when some said he could beat FMJ although I did predict a Cotto pts win over AM so you do never know in boxing.
     
  8. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    He did all he could,he had nothing left,he didn't quit
     
  9. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    Incorrect analysis. Your assesment was that Cotto condeded defeat. People only concede defeat when they are hopelesly behind or the outcome is, for the most part, already decided. Politicians concede elections when they find out that they are too far behind in the polls. Golfers concede a hole when their opponent is putting really close to the hole.

    So, if we are to believe that Cotto "conceded defeat". That would mean that Cotto would've had to know that he had no realistic shot of winning. However, that wasn't the case. He was still possibly close on the scorecards, and could've pulled out a win had he survived the 11th and won the 12th. Peter, on the other hand, knew he could not win a decision. So, if we accept your "conceded defeat" argument, then Peter was more justified in his decision being that he knew a decision victory was not possible.

    In reality, they both quit. Boxing is different than Golf or politics. One punch can change a whole fight. Therefore, giving up before the fight is over with is quitting. Now Cotto was taking a beating, so I can understand him quitting. However, he still quit. Peter was also taking a beating and knew he couldn't win a decision, so I can understand him quitting. So I say, we should be understanding of both or critical of both.

    Peter was getting his ass handed to him and knew for a fact that a decision was out of the question. Don't try **** on him and then turn around and excuse Cotto's actions. Peter was actually getting hit with more flush shots and was in danger of suffering some bad injuries just like Cotto.
     
  10. Sinew

    Sinew The Assassin Full Member

    5,125
    191
    Feb 7, 2005
    He " gave up "
     
  11. Sinew

    Sinew The Assassin Full Member

    5,125
    191
    Feb 7, 2005
    Strong points. Just like the last time this topic was up for discussion.
     
  12. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007

    Good post. There's a negative conotation associated witht he word quit which is why people get so upset about it. In reality, the guy quit. However, he still fought his heart out and has nothing to be ashamed of. Boxing is a brutal sport. Sometimes you have know when to give in. I'm pretty sure it was hard decision for him to make.
     
  13. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    :good
     
  14. mexican legend

    mexican legend MVP! Full Member

    17,356
    1
    Jul 19, 2008
    [YT]H8OOtzKiJqQ&feature=related[/YT]

    For those of you who said Cotto could have continued look at round 11 again. Look how he goes down during the second knockdown. It's clear he had nothing left and he couldnt continue.
     
  15. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    My thoughts exactly.