Did Cus cheat Liston out of a higher all-time ranking?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Rollin, Feb 15, 2024.


  1. Pugguy

    Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT Full Member

    17,280
    28,193
    Aug 22, 2021
    No worries. Sharing is caring. Lol.

    Yeah, while still very technically sound, Liston had notably slowed and didn’t have the same snap to his prime punch though still possessed of his raw, natural power.

    While advancing age was obviously catching up, Liston’s lifestyle external to the ring was also taking its toll.

    In all possibility, before Joe began to truly smoke, Sonny might’ve stunned/hurt Frazier early and put the pedal to the metal to finish it - thus, Liston wasn’t worth the risk.

    But more likely Sonny can’t catch Joe so cleanly or sufficiently clean, and after say, 4-5-6 rounds, Liston would begin to notably fatigue - not a good thing to be tiring fast with a raging Frazier in your grill. Quite frightening actually.

    Interesting that an older, past prime Machen actually shook Joe all the way down to his heels - it was as close to a KD as could be without yielding an actual KD.
     
    swagdelfadeel and Bokaj like this.
  2. Kid Bacon

    Kid Bacon All-Time-Fat Full Member

    5,674
    7,213
    Nov 8, 2011

    Well, when even the POTUS is calling you out to fight Liston it is not like you have many options left...

    Can somebody confirm if this is true?:

    "On December 4, 1961, Sonny knocked out Germany’s Albert Westphal in 1:58 of the first round in Philadelphia’s Convention Hall as part of a closed circuit doubleheader with the Floyd Patterson-Tom McNeeley title bout in Toronto. President John F. Kennedy, watching both bouts, remarked that “it would have been a better fight if Liston had fought Patterson.” Floyd took that as a cue to manager Cus D’Amato’s objections to Sonny as a titular opponent. Patterson defended against Liston in Comiskey Park, Chicago, on September 25, 1962, and the rest is history."

    The Most Feared Fighter in Boxing History: Charles 'Sonny' Liston remembered - The Ring (ringtv.com)
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,879
    44,625
    Apr 27, 2005
    Was two more immediate fights fair and just tho? How often in history has the world champ fought the same guy three fights in a row? Is this the only time in heavyweight history the same pair have fought three times in a row for the title? Maybe at any weight?

    I can understand given the competitiveness of the second fight they went again but it's rarer than hens teeth. Patterson was also a pretty big fave in the third fight after the way the second ended. Ingo could easily have been made to sit aside for a while and fight his way back. Patterson could have had an easy defense before fighting someone harder, potentially Liston.

    There was a year between the first and second fight and 9 months until the third. As a matter of fact Pattersons whole schedule was slow. He fought Jackson 8 months after winning the title, had what was virtually an expected exhibition against Rademacher a month later, took another year to fight Harris, 9 months to London then over a year until Ingo, then another year to Ingo 2 then 9 months to Ingo 3. That's pretty slow going. Once he got the Liston matches out of the way Ali set a much better pace. Marciano immediately prior to Patterson also set a much better pace. Perhaps the bigger criticism is the lack of urgency by Patterson and his team in defending. I don't think i am missing any big injury scheme.
     
    swagdelfadeel, zadfrak and Pugguy like this.
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,114
    Mar 21, 2007
    It wasn't unfair. It's true that the heavyweight title being contested between the same two fighters back-to-back is rare, but the whole series took nine months. More than that, the more important question for me is, how many times in heavyweight history did two fighters swap violent knockouts in back-to-back fights? It's true that some people in the press didn't like what occurred, but it'd be seen as pretty natural today.

    In the end, Sonny Liston became the number one contender in 1960 and got his title shot in 1962. There are literally hundreds of fighters with deeper gripes than Sonny's including dozens who never got their shot. A list of number-one contenders who didn't fight for the lineal would have quite a few names on (and interesting ones) I think.
     
  5. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,114
    Mar 21, 2007
    And for the third (fourth?) time, I know it's not a big deal, I just mentioned it in passing. I bet you are feeling generous next time you ask though.

    Moving on, always in your own gift. You can just ignore the post, say "yeah ok" or "nah agree to disagree". But when you quote people at length you'll usually get a reply.

    I'll ****ing break you up in a minute.
     
  6. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,879
    44,625
    Apr 27, 2005
    I must be misunderstanding you because i thought the whole series took 21 months? There was a year between fight 1 and 2 then another 9 months between 2 and 3. The whole series would be three fights.
     
  7. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,114
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah, nine between 2 and 3.

    But Liston was number 3 for fight two. He wasn't even the wounded party (as far as it goes) for that second fight (and still behind Patterson). I know people like to say Patterson was ducking Liston from 59, but that's not reasonable IMO. Everyone in the division has a story - until you're at the top of the pile, what's the complaint?
     
    crixus85 likes this.
  8. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,879
    44,625
    Apr 27, 2005
    Ok how do you view my potential criticisms of Pattersons lacklustre pace? Obviously it was fast enough to keep from being stripped but it's pretty slack really comparative to his peers both prior and after. I think this might be the bigger problem.
     
  9. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,114
    Mar 21, 2007
    Well Rocky was champ for 1093 days and boxed 6 defences for 182 days per defence.
    Patterson was champ for 1763 days total and boxed 8 defences for 220 days per defence.
    Liston was champ for 517 days and boxed two defences for 258 days per defence.
    I'd do Ali but there's too many title reigns for me to be bothered - he'd be busier though.

    That's an extra month per defence against Rocky. Definitely slowing down, but maybe unfair if we called him slow, i'd say (unless you think Rocky was slowish).
     
    Last edited: Feb 17, 2024
  10. Pugguy

    Pugguy Ingo, The Thinking Man’s GOAT Full Member

    17,280
    28,193
    Aug 22, 2021
    You’re still snagged on this?

    The amount of times we’ve exchanged on this are on you. You initiated, commented re the date, I duly replied and no, you weren’t quoted at length nor replied to inappropriately.

    Could’ve been squared and done, right there but here we are, still.

    You could’ve ignored my request for the info in the first instance if it didn’t fit your subjective caveat - info that you didn’t actually provide anyway.

    You can bet all you like - don’t forget, I did actually receive the information I requested - just as I have received and imparted information many times before without a glitch or issue with the framing of my requests.

    What’s up with moving on? Nothing, of course.

    I’ve duly replied and then civilly tried to extricate myself from further discussion of what was and still is a pointless bone of contention. I think I’ve also said all good a couple of times.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    113,015
    48,114
    Mar 21, 2007
    I'd say you are still snagged on it.

    This is not true. You have no control over any other poster on the forum and when they "leave it alone" or "move on." You control your own posting though. What you seem to want to do is post at length and then tell me to move on. You had the same problem with Entawood, over months and months. When you want to move on, just move on. Stop quoting me at great length to tell me to move on.

    And when you ask for ranking, give dates. It's better.
     
  12. newurban99

    newurban99 Active Member Full Member

    1,239
    1,952
    Apr 24, 2010
    Clay still beats Liston in 1963. Very possible he beats Sonny in '62. Too much speed.
     
    Pedro_El_Chef and PRW94 like this.
  13. newurban99

    newurban99 Active Member Full Member

    1,239
    1,952
    Apr 24, 2010
    The stench from the Lewiston fight made Liston a pariah. He wasn't a gate attraction anymore. The disgusted public shunned him. He was scrubbed from the rankings. Nobody stood to gain by fighting him or promoting him.
     
  14. newurban99

    newurban99 Active Member Full Member

    1,239
    1,952
    Apr 24, 2010
    Very interesting. I didn't know that Machen had a rematch clause. Interesting that Machen's team considered Johansson dangerous enough to insist on one. The knockout was a complete shocker.

    P.S. I don't think Folley would have been a problem for Patterson at any point in Floyd's career.
     
    Pugguy, swagdelfadeel and PRW94 like this.
  15. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,879
    44,625
    Apr 27, 2005
    Personally i can't see much of a case for Clay beating Liston in 62. Liston's one fight in 62 was his first demolition of Patterson and he was in brutal shape and form. He'd waited a long time for this. Listons sole fight in 63 was the Patterson rematch so we know he was on fire and still motivated for that one too. Clay tho was coming on hard. I think it's fair to say Liston saw Clay as a bit of an easy win in that first encounter so you'd think it would have been the same even if a year earlier.
     
    Bokaj and swagdelfadeel like this.