Did Dempsey blatantly foul Miske in their 3rd fight

Dempsey could not have been prosecuted under the Mann Act unless he transported Cates across the state line, since he didn't Goldman is like you, talking out of his a*se.
You just keep repeating it Goebbels.

 

Like me the referee and ringsiders such as Gene Tunney saw no low blow I guess they were lying too.
:think

 

I would hate to debate such era's with you Mac, you've got some serious game.

 

There are many here with more knowledge than myself J. T. but Dempsey is definitely one of my favourites.

 

You've sure got some knowledge on him too.

 

You're very kind, Seamus would disagree of course.:yep

 

Well i know where to look when i have any Dempsey related questions!

 

Not that I read beyond the first few sentences of your post, but how many smoking guns does your cortex need before you recognize there is a fire?

 

Yeah, ask the guy who has read four whole books on Dempsey.

I have a dozen either by or about Dempsey on my shelf, have a file cabinet full of articles, and and for what it is worth a signature.

 

Was Gibbons lying, also?

 

I'm an expert on no fighter and have never pretended to be.
You don't have half a dozen books or anything like it that are autobiographies of Dempsey.
I've three cabinets full of Rings ,BI's ,Ko's cuttings,a loft full of Boxing news and news clippings all going back to the 50's ,so f*cking what ? A post card of the famous Dempsey v Willard mural that graced Dempsey's restaurant it's signed and my Father in law got it when he was in Jack's restaurant,he bequeathed it to me,does that mean I'm superior in any way.:think

And I bet my pr*ck's bigger than yours!
Grow the f*ck up!atsch

 

Why , what did Gibbons say about the Dempsey v Miske fight ? Because that is what we are discussing, or what most of us are.

 

Well we have to give you credit for doing your best with your matches.