Did Firpo turn down 2 offers to fight Greb for a substantial purse, why?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by dempsey1234, Nov 21, 2016.


  1. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Kr apper, another one of many that you post that you cant back up, like the Kearns "stalling", now this that Firpo RAN, from Greb lol.
    Is this where all your research led you to make these unsubstantiated claims?
     
  2. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    Greb best work was up close. Fripo was a big hitter and wrestling type. In a distance fight of 10 rounds or more, I do not think Greb would win.
     
  3. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Not to beat a dead horse but you did say "Greb was game and wanted it. Firpo, in his own words wanted someone less threatening.". Ok what was the offer and why did Firpo turn it down, "less threatening", makes no sense, Greb was a MW, with no pop. It's a question that's all and should be answered since you know all about Greb you do tend to exaggerate in favor of Greb.
     
  4. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    To be fair to Klompton, it would probably be a good idea to check his book before calling him out on a question like this. Chances are, he probably has already answered it.
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Yes ,there is always the possibility that he is," keeping his powder dry", on this subject.
     
  6. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    I dont think that buying his book would enlighten me further on this cos from his past posts he tends to exaggerate in favor of Greb. I cant see Firpo running from any fight let alone a MW with little pop in his guns. I tend to think this would have been a bad fight and a dangerous one for Greb. Greb relied on his speed, his awkward style and that he wouldnt let a guy get set. How would he have done with a bull rushing, wild swinging puncher who just threw his shots he just swung he didnt rely on getting set. Maybe it just as well that the fight didnt happen, but I still think "ran" is a bit of an exaggeration.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,728
    29,078
    Jun 2, 2006
    Well it doesn't look like we are going to find out anytime soon.
     
  8. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    Krapton is a cherry picker. He selects data that pushes his personal beliefs rather than historical fact.
     
  9. dempsey1234

    dempsey1234 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,764
    270
    Jun 25, 2012
    Here 'tis professor, now on to the next question:

    The "Kearns stalling killed the Greb fight in Pitts., those are your words. First off "stalling" is a well known business practice, which was and still is a way to get better terms. The Pitts guy wanted to pay 35% and Kearns wanted 50%. Kearns FYI, had every right to negotiate how and for what he wanted. He was under no obligation to even consider it, let alone accept it.

    Your response:
    "You can call it what you want but EVERY time a generous offer was floated to Dempsey both he and Kearns, not just Kearns, found an excuse not to accept."

    -Who is the judge of this generous offer, you? Apparently it wasnt generous enough, but let's take it a bit further, under what obligation was Dempsey, to accept this generous offer? I will answer it for you "NONE".

    "In every instance they either took on a lesser opponent, or simply did not fight.

    -Tell me again under what obligation was Dempsey to accept any offer to fight Greb? Why are you trying to prop up Greb, using Dempsey to do so. If he fought who he fought lessor or not it was Dempsey's decision, which he had every right to fight or not fight, your interpretation is that Dempsey, was afraid, embarrassed, ducked or whatever. Not so.

    "If it were one isolated incident you might have point but it wasnt. It happened five or six times in regards to Greb and innumerable times in regards to Wills.
    Ive covered this ground with you before with numerous examples and citations, far outweighing anything youve ever brought to the table."

    -I bring common sense and knowledge of the business which you seem to be solely lacking. You know and it has been covered in numerous articles of the time why Wills and Dempsey didnt fight. So stop with with the spewing of manure on Wills and Greb.

    Why are you ignoring what was the feeling at the time, Greb was a 5'8 MW, with no pop, he was just too small, if like you say you know all that there is to know about Greb, then this must also be in your book, what respected writers were saying. Even Greb had reservations which also should be in your book.

    The fact is you CHOOSE TO BELIEVE what you want to BELIEVE. The record, Dempsey's record, and the behavior of both he and Kearns shows a very clear pattern.

    -Thats right I apply common sense and I have a right to that.

    "That is indisputable. Stalling CAN be a business practice BUT if you have a limited amount of time for the promoter to be able to stage the event and you stall past the point that he can have the arena built, print tickets, etc then it isnt a business tactic, its ducking."

    Again, the answer is so simple which you seem to ignore, cos it doesnt fit your ducking claim. First, that is not Dempsey's or Kearns, fault. The promoter was dumb, to plan a fight, without doing his homework namely, getting the negotiations out of the way and having the signatures in place then set a date. This he didnt do instead he already had a date in mind but was still negotiating terms, he wanted to give up 35% and Kearns wanted 50%, the promoter decided it was too much. What promoter worth anything doesnt allow for having the arena built, print tickets, etc.? If there was a time limit meant there was pressure on the promoter to get it done, he didnt end of story but to you that was proof of Dempsey ducking Greb, which again, and this is getting tiresome Dempsey was under no obligation to even consider.

    "As for the percentage etc, you can only cut the pie so many ways before you price yourself out of the promotion. Its done all of the time as Im sure someone with even your limited intellect is aware."

    -Boy are you deluded, then what you are saying that this promoter was trying to play with the big boys and didnt have the money or the wherewithal to make the fight happen. Dempsey was the champ, and he set a price which he had a right. So there is your answer, thanks for bringing it up. Even with my "limited intellect", I am aware but since you wrote this I guess you do not have the limited intellect" to figure it out, cos you answered your own statement.

    "You cant argue both sides of the argument, if Greb was such a weak opponent then anyone as supposedly devastating as Dempsey would have been jumping at the chance to pick such a huge sum for such supposedly easy work."

    -Maybe to you the amount was huge, to Dempsey and Kearns perhaps it wasnt. Since you still DKSAB, you argue the same point, that Dempsey ducked Greb. Use your commonsense why fight a MW with no pop, and if you beat up a smaller guy, what does that do the public will get on him for fighting a MW, you must know what was said after the Carp fight about Carp's size. Anyway Dempsey made a business decision and he stuck by it, he didnt fight Greb.

    If Dempsey thought the fight was so challenging that he wanted to wring every cent out of the promoter for such a risk then you have to admit that Greb wasnt such a bad challenger anyway.

    Jeez just as I thought you reached the depth of your lack of knowledge you come up with an dumber statement. This is professional boxing you are supposed to wring every cent that you can for any opponent thats the nature of the beast. Maybe you should suggest that for "A" level guys they should get a huge amount, then for a "B" level guy you should get a much lessor amount. I hate to tell you this but then the poor "B" level guys would not fight at all, which happens all the time. The HW championship is the Gold standard, champions know sooner or later they will get the amount they are looking for so they can wait.
     
  10. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,536
    Apr 26, 2015
    The question concerning CHERRYPICKING is the following:

    Their is plenty of evidence to suggest a plausible reason why a Greb-Dempsey fight was never made was Grebs very small size. Instead of presenting this side of the argument the poster in question instead tries to paint a picture that somehow a 190 pound, 6' 1 one punch ko power heavyweight champion was afraid to fight a 5'8 middleweight.

    This tendency to choose only the evidence that suits an argument one wants to present vs presenting the evidence in its entirety is a real problem. You see it from the poster as above, you see it in his comments concerning many different aspects of boxing history. He has a specific agenda and he presents only that evidence that supports that agenda.
     
    dempsey1234 and louis54 like this.
  11. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    From wikipedia, I found this on the "revisionist historian" and "holocaust denier" David Irving, who specialises in Nazi era Germany.

    People who are wise to, and familiar with Klompton's methods will see the relevance here :

    ---------------------------------------------------

    Writing in 1989 about Irving's Göring biography, the German-Canadian historian Peter Hoffmann declared:


    “ Mr. Irving's constant references to archives, diaries and letters, and the overwhelming amount of detail in his work, suggest objectivity. In fact they put a screen behind which a very different agenda is transactedMr. Irving is a great obfuscator… Distortions affect every important aspect of this book to the point of obfuscation… It is unfortunate that Mr Irving wastes his extraordinary talents as a researcher and writer on trivializing the greatest crimes in German history, on manipulating historical sources and on highlighting the theatrics of the Nazi era"
     
  12. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,578
    Nov 24, 2005
    Not that distorting the picture events in professional boxing in the Harry Greb era is in ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM comparable to distorting the events of the Third Reich and WW2 ...... but the case of David Irving shows how far off the rails a meticulous researcher/writer can go when it comes to offering a fair and balanced assessment of that era which he has done perhaps unparalleled research in.
     
  13. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,230
    Feb 15, 2006
    The scenario that you are describing is plausible.

    Firpo was obviously a carefully managed fighter, and he was quite financially astute as well.

    The Willard fight was a clever piece of match making.

    Willard was a name fighter coming off a big win, who time was catching up with, where a win would almost certainly secure a title fight.

    Dempsey of course was the champion.

    After Firpo lost to Dempsey, the Wills fight almost made itself.

    The only way that Firpo was going to get another tile fight was by beating Wills, and Wills represented the most lucrative match outside of Dempsey himself win lose or draw.

    I have no evidence that an offer was made for a Greb Firpo fight, but I think that Firpo's management would have been reluctant to take it, especially before he fought Dempsey.

    Then again, Firpo as a contender was under absolutely no obligation whatsoever to fight Greb.
     
  14. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,579
    27,230
    Feb 15, 2006
    You need to tread carefully here.

    I would not personally equate somebody who I perceived to be partisan in their interpretation of boxing history, with somebody who was a Nazi apologist.

    The comparison could be considered offensive.
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,561
    46,158
    Feb 11, 2005
    My 2 pence while I have internet...

    I have never seen reference to a potential Greb Firpo bout in the hundreds of newspaper articles I have read from that period.

    Klompton has probably read tens of thousands of articles, tho. And no one here, excepting Moyle and Pollack, has put out anything on par with his work on Greb in terms of research. Forgive me if I defer to the guy with decent material published on the subject in general. Still, there was no mention of a Firpo Greb bout in his book


    As a lightheavy champ, Greb was not outlandishly small to challenge for the heavyweight title in that day. And I can quote articles , quoting the same writers being used in this thread, that account to Greb's power. We know he had Brennan ready to go at least once and gave Tunney a thrashing the likes he had never before or after endured.
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2016