I think we can look objectively and see that Pulev had a better career than Liakhovich and Stiverne. For one his losses are a lot less humiliating. Losing to Wladimir Klitschko is not quite the same as losing to Shannon Briggs and Maurice Harris. As far as wins I'd take Chisora over Arreola and put it roughly on par with Brewster
Sorry I missed that you know as well as I do boxing is corrupt do you also think Stiverne was a legit defence for Wilder and should of been ranked in the top 10 as you need to be to get a title shot? Or was he just there so Wilder could KO him to then say hey I knocked out everyone I fought? How did he get to be in that position with 1 fight against a no name in almost 3 years it was not by merit I can tell you that much So my source is not being nieve enough to believe fighters are not protected to so they can make promoters money
Wilder should have lost to Ortiz in the first fight and his story would have been much different, he would have been knocked out cold at the start of the 8th round if they didn’t give him an extra 20 seconds to look at his cut’s he didn’t have. So let’s be real here. Wilder conned everyone nothing to do with his recent loss. Ortiz was his first real opponent and he should have been sparked out, and anyone who has seen the fight knows that is exactly what would have happened if wilder wasn’t given that recovery time at the start of the 8th.
Wilder was a conn job and couldn’t box he was the worst champion in boxing history. He beat no one and should have lost to Ortiz in the first fight. He then got beat 3 times by Tyson Fury. By Parker and then by Zhang, previously he fought no one. So of the seven times he fought real opponents he lost 6 of them but he should have never got the opportunity because Ortiz would have knocked him out without the help from the doctor and the referee. So massive con job
So there is no source to what you published in regards to Haymon you just made it up to back up what you had posted !