Did Fury win because he's unbeaten OR

furys the prospect hence give him the decision, wat a ****ing joke!

 

Partly because he's unbeaten, partly because he was heavily favoured.

If you watch a fight and are only looking for what you want (or expect) to see you can get a weird distortion.

 

No-one wants to see a fat bloke be champion. Especially O'Connor apparently.

 

I felt it was a draw, and initially I assumed Tezza was motioning for both of their arms......

After almost committing suicide listening to Watt I turned the sound down, Macca was doing a lot of lunging and holding, whilst Fury's workrate was pretty good at times.

We do need three scoring judges, or even a single judge. Referees should referee, judges should judge.

 

That decision was in competence pure and simple. O conner is a former pro himself so he must have seen john was having the best of the exchanges, fury basically had nothing left in the last few rounds and was throwing arm punches and fighting in spurts. Mcdermott was tired but landing better shots. The board should order an imediate rematch

 

it wasn't a boxing outcome it was a market-ability prospect.....
...i'm ****ing disgusted.....

 

I agree, Watt and Smith ruined that fight for me completely, it was closer than 98-92 clearly, but the Sky team were overly biased towards McDermott.

 

Cheers Jeff.

 

I thought the fight was close but had fury winning.Jim watts scorecard was a ****ing disgrace.

 

he won it because we still have this pathetic practice of refs judging title fights

 

Watts card wasn't the issue, 2 rounds was reasonable, but the commentary was so one-eyed it became farcical. Adam Smith is useless.

 

the sky pundits are all a disgrace if fury was with sky they'd be saying he won the fight, they just come out with absolute contrived bull**** and say a lot of nothing

 

Did fury ****ing win?? *******! i was just told by text that he lost!!
Now i'm pissed off!

 

Slip and Mr Plow And Beeston i agree with your above posts lads.