Did Fury win because he's unbeaten OR

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by D-MAC, Sep 11, 2009.


  1. leighton

    leighton Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,455
    0
    Jun 21, 2009
    A joke Terry O' Connor should get a ban after that fight. McDermott got robbed tonight and O' Connor needs glasses after that what the **** did he see in FURY that everyone else didnt see.
     
  2. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    No, he lost alright:good





    Its just that Terry O'Connor happened to think he won, due to the fact that he was spaced off his tits at the time.
     
  3. irishhitman

    irishhitman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,217
    0
    Dec 25, 2008
    watt and smith were biased...i thought the fight was closer than what they were watching
     
  4. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    I wanted Fury to win it, but I thought McD took it comfortably.

    Even if we disagree about the winner, you must admit that O'Connor's card was ****ing disgraceful? 98-92 Fury? C'mon.
     
  5. irishhitman

    irishhitman Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,217
    0
    Dec 25, 2008
    it does not matter who you want to win...but it was clear from the off that watt and smith were talking up macdermotts successes...saying that a 1 point winner either way would have been a fair result
     
  6. nickythekid

    nickythekid Active Member Full Member

    780
    0
    Apr 11, 2009
    no matter what the refs decision, fury knows he struggled there and his talk post fight couldn't disguise the truth he must surely know. fury didn't look the hot prospect hes touted as being.
     
  7. D-MAC

    D-MAC Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,294
    6
    Apr 15, 2008
    (1) It does to an extent, because in a lot of cases it can rule out undue bias.

    (2) I agree, the sky commentators are shite. But I actually thought Watt tightened up his scorecard near the end a bit too much. I thought McD walked it by three or four rounds. But yes, they did harp on about McD a bit too much, especially in the earlier rounds.

    (3) So, you agree that O'Connor's card was ****?
     
  8. sugarsean

    sugarsean Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,496
    14
    Jun 2, 2009
    if you thought Fury won that fight then your opinion is a disgrace
     
  9. Neverchair

    Neverchair Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,318
    2
    Oct 19, 2008
    I had McDermott winning by three rounds and I went to see Tyson win.

    I was sitting just near ringside and the tv didn't do it justice. I really don't know what fight the ref thought he had just watched.

    Absolute robbery.
     
  10. NO MAS

    NO MAS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,784
    1
    Mar 2, 2009
    I cannot see how McDermott was only given 2 rounds....I had him 4 up at the end of round 5...:think

    Ritchie Davies is our best domestic ref and should have reffed this contest...:good He would not have given such a poor decision as that...:yep

    98-92....:barf
     
  11. Jeff Young

    Jeff Young Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,656
    0
    Jun 5, 2009
    This content is protected
     
  12. ninebar

    ninebar Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,032
    0
    May 24, 2008
    I scored that fight 95-95, Terry O'Connors scorecard was a ****ing disgrace!
     
  13. davidjay

    davidjay Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,512
    1,188
    Feb 23, 2009
    An unbeaten great white hope fighting in front of a partisan crowd on Sky. Was he ever going to lose a decision?
     
  14. billy nelson

    billy nelson the fighting scots gym Full Member

    15,873
    674
    Jan 9, 2009
    the one thing that fight shows us is tyson is not going to be world class,if he gets hit by world class punchers he'll be ko'd and his stamina is totally suspect.
     
  15. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    Bit harsh on his stamina Billy..... he has gone from four rounds to ten in one fight.

    He needs to find a tough guy that isn't particularly dangerous that will take him six or eight rounds - really he needed to find one of those prior to this fight.

    In hindsight it was one fight too soon, but in the UK there is a distinct lack of decent heavyweight journeymen, that are better than the likes of Peret anyway.

    For some reason our promoters are reluctant to put them on bills abroad - there are countless half decent heavyweights in Germany/Eastern Europe that can provide better tests, between club and title level.