Did Holyfield beat Lewis in their 2nd fight? Round by Round Breakdown

You can say whatever you want about holyfield but he did fight the tougher opponents that i think we could all agree on even the dick slobbing lewis fans

 

Well 70% (26-61 as I write this) of the posters think Lewis won the second fight regardless of the out come in the first. Having seen the second this is my view and it can be backed by a round by round score, if necessary. What you are espousing is a theory, but unfortunately the actual activity which took place in the ring refute this theory. The second fight wasn't that hard to score and it was 8-4 for Lewis. And if you're a Holyfield fan I can even see it being 7-5 Lewis. Beyond that and someone's objectivity is lost to either call it a draw and, god forbid, a Holyfield win.

 

3 experienced judges? there was an investigation of the judges whatever her name was. one round where Lewis had beat holyfield very badly, she gave it to holyfield, I had the first fight easily for lewis and the second closer but still for lewis

 

And the vast majority of us jurors say that Lennox won both times.

Thanks for clearing that up. :good


Case closed AGAIN.

 

No chuck! This thread only proves that a good many people thought Holy was robbed. The poll can be ignored as to the credibility of posters who may be biased in either direction. Eg; some british posters supporting Lennox might not even have seen the fight............. :rofl :good

 

Yeah, coming from someone who claimed that the doctor saved Lewis against VITLAY....the judges did Lewis a favour against Holyfield......etc etc etc.

Did Lewis ever actually win a fight fair and square, on your planet?

For the record, first fight 10-2 or 9-3 Lewis, 2nd fight 8-4 or 7-5. No controversy, he won because he landed more punches, as the stats proved.

Holyfields subsequent showings also prove that Lewis did him serious damage, whereas Lewis went from strength to strength. Every way you look at it Lewis came out of those 2 fights better off than Holyfield :deal

 

So not only did 70% of the posters on this site think Lewis won the second fight, independent of what happened in the first, but the punch states and the judges also believe this to be the case. That quite the conspiracy theory you've drummed up, just so we could all screw Holyfield of a much deserved win...

 

No he didn't! He lost credibility in a lot of punters eyes because he got a gift decision to placate the draw in the first fight. Holy landed the more accurate shots and had Lucky backed on the ropes consistently.
Lucky-Len.... the term applies well for other fights as well! :nono

 

Hmmmm......well there's a first, a man becoming undisputed champion of the world whilst simultaneously losing credibility :nut

Oh yes Lucky Lennox, now you're going to bring the VITLAY fight up again right? All I can say is take a look at the faces of the two fighters afterwards and say to yourself....."who looks like the loser here???"

:deal

 

Did you ever consider the possibility that you don't know how to judge fights?

 

The word is 'how', and you blew your cover.. Canadian. Canada and Britain go together in Lucky Lens makeup. He's part of both as you already know, so remove your colored specs..........:hey :smooch

 

good catch shamrock another lewis fan is tagged

 

So not only did 70% of the posters on this site think Lewis won the second fight, independent of what happened in the first, but the punch states and the judges also believe this to be the case. That quite the conspiracy theory you've drummed up, just so we could all screw Holyfield of a much deserved win...

That's a boy, comment one spelling issues, rather than answering a very pointed question, that's impressive. Course there's always the possibility that comprehension's not your strong suit.

And yes I am Canadian, but the judges weren't and neither was compubox, nor the majority of posters. But at least one American appears to rely on misdirection, rather than dealing with facts.

 

Your vote was Canadian! :deal :hi:

 

You, Zakman and maybe one or two others.

The majority of boxing fans hate Lennox or at least never cared much about him. If anything, a poll will be biased in HOLYFIELD's favour because the neutrals will prefer to vote for him.

And before you spout more bull**** about this being a "british" board (which it isn't), post a similar poll on ANY boxing forum and the result will be the same. If a vote was taken of boxing journalists and judges, the result will also be the same.

I guess the whole world is wrong except for you, Zak and your pals (and aliases :yep), huh?