Part I This content is protected ``The money they're talking, the payper-view numbers they're talking, man, I'd be a fool not to go over there,'' said Hopkins. ``The only way I won't go to Wales is if they tell me the ring will be a triangle.'' -Hopkins, 2002 HBO had screened 5 of Hopkins title defenses but they decided to turn down his fight against Morrade Hakker, deeming it unsuitable. King would then take the fight to Showtime who were interested in buying it but only under the condition that Hopkins enter into a three fight deal involving fights with Joe Calzaghe and Harry Simon. noskys-nuggets-hopkins-backed-into-corner.htm Part II According to Jay Larkin this is what happened when the Calzaghe fight was being discussed: Jay Larkin This content is protected - Jay Larkin, then Showtime TV Network's Senior Vice-President of Sports and Event Programming. Source: Joe Calzaghe's autobiography, 2007 PART III There are a number of problems with this article: Problem 1: Was the fight really going to be held in America? According to Hopkins the fight was going to be in Wales: Boxing +Calzaghe+v+Hopkins+hits+a+snag. Calzaghe refused to fight in America and had pulled out of every attempt ****** had made to get him to fight over there including fights on HBO on Hamed and Delahoya undercards. Problem 2: How much money was really on the table : According to respected sports writer, Thomas Hauser Showtime's annual boxing budget is 20m, with Showtime paying at most 2m for any given fight. http://www.secondsout.com/columns/thomas-hauser/hbo-2008 According to Jay Larkin the most he would of paid for Hopkins-Daniels would be 500k. The 96-4 Purse Split Was 10.5m really on the table for Hopkins to fight three relatively unknown fighters or did they tell him that he might POTENTIALLY end up making that amount? Problem 3: What were the terms of the agreement 2002-07-30-hopkins_x.htm noskys-nuggets-hopkins-backed-into-corner.htm I think we can safely assume that the 3m for Calzaghe would of also been subject to such terms as well, with Hopkins having to split it with King and Calzaghe. Hopkins most likely would of got around 1.4-1.5m for the fight, which would explain why Hopkins would insist on more money and Showtime would then pull the deal. Problem 4: Is Jay Larkin a reliable source? Jay Larkin would get sacked from Showtime after the Calzaghe-Lacy fight he would then get hired by waaren to be Calzaghes representive in America. In fact Larkin was the one who brokered the deal to get Calzaghe onto HBo. So is Larkin really the most objective source? I think not. http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/boxing/news/story?id=2421092 King, the peoples champion, was able to save the day by selling the Hakkar fight back to HBO as part of a package deal: 363-another-mis-mandatory.htm And Hopkins would then continue his relationship with HBO poll to come
No. Bhop was defendin the undisputed MW title. There was no onus on him to go up in weight to chase Calz, let alone go overseas to do it. If they were in the same division at the time, there'd be more room for discussion.
Another thread about Calzaghe? :huh Duck is a strong word, considering Hopkins was never mandated to face Joe C, and was in the division below. However, if anyone is to blame for the fight not happening, it's Hopkins http://www.southwalesargus.co.uk/ar...e/4616976.Hopkins_names_Calzaghe_on_hit_list/ late 2002 (declining Calzaghe fight, to stalking Trinidad for a rematch) http://www.puertorico-herald.org/issues/2002/vol6n35/PRSportsBeat0635-en.html http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/boxing/3030004.stm http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Calzaghe+showdown+with+Hopkins+off,+says+******.-a0113144541 http://stage.thesweetscience.com/news/articles/4526-hopkinscalzaghe-not-so-fast These links were originally posted by Fighting Pride http://www.secondsout.com/columns/thomas-hauser/dibella-v-hopkins1
I doubt Calzaghe would have took the fight even if it was scheduled to go ahead. He tended to fake injuries when he found out he was fighting someone who seemed tough.
Oh dear. These two actually fought, whilst ranked 3rd and 4th p4p. Whilst SMW and LHW champion. When the fight was biggest, it happened. So neither ducked the other, the fact they fought should give you a hint there.
Showtime only had a $2m budget per fight? Funny how they were joint broadcasters for Lewis-Tyson. Can't imagine that came cheap.
I agree with lufcrazy. They fought, when both were top p4p fighters. Hopkins still had a few years left as LHW number 1. Hardly shot like they say.
Great thread, someone should post a link to it on Nathan Celeverly's twitter account so he can educate himself.
Calzaghe didn't call out anybody, his promoter did all the calling out then cooked up half baked stories to feed the world to make it look like fighters were ducking Cazlaghe.
Hopkins could have moved up to face Calzaghe like Calzaghe could have moved up to face Jones...all during their prime years. it didn't happen. That's boxing. That's the business. You also have to remember, besides the title defense record he was going after (and I can't remember which fight/year he got it)...but you never know if he was really waiting for that big payday and popularity boost against O$car since Tito came up after him as well.
Hopkins was always a pain to work with. It was more about money than him actually ducking Calzaghe. That's why he didn't fight Jones at around the same time. 60/40 was a fair offer but Hopkins rejected it. Even the op's post is littered with suggestions that this was the case. Hopkins has been fighting the system his whole life.
people who are voting 'yes' and dont think calzaghe deserves a large slice of the blame for the fight not being made at that time are dreaming the fight was made easily once hopkins had been dethroned several years later - and if you can understand the reason why it was made then, but not at all in 2002 - then you'll realise it was joe's fight to make