Did hopkins fight the wrong fight against Calzaghe?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by cuco64, Oct 24, 2008.


  1. pauliemayweathe

    pauliemayweathe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,995
    0
    Dec 27, 2007
    The rematch would be the same and all the people who said he should have been busier...will, well just say the same thing:patsch Not that easy to just rip JC with combos and move...he is not there to be ripped and if he is u r getting twice as much in return...u have to punch when he does and hope u hit him flush...which he did once but that is not enough
     
  2. Primadonna Kool

    Primadonna Kool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,545
    7
    Dec 5, 2006
    • Bernard Hopkins should of fought inside the pocket like James Toney, old school style with the slick-ness of a black fighter. Bernard Hopkins can fight this way average, but James Toney is the greatest technical fighter in this department and then Floyd Mayweather. There is no point in trying to out move Joe Calzaghe, thats why you must fight him this way. Floyd Mayweather knew there was no point in trying to out move Ricky Hatton because Hatton is anything but slow on his feet, thats why Floyd Mayweather mixed it up inside with the slick-ness of a black fighter.
     
  3. Ted Stickles

    Ted Stickles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,244
    2,185
    Jun 24, 2007
    Hopkins looked fast against Pavlik because Kelly is slow.....If he employs those tactics with Joe he plays right into Joes hands because the speed difference would become clear immediately....Why people cant see that Hopkins fighting fighters like Joe,Roy,Taylor,etc.....People who are fast and set a fast pace will always be his Achilles Heel.
     
  4. clubberlang

    clubberlang Active Member Full Member

    521
    0
    Apr 12, 2008
    Bang on the money!:good
     
  5. power play

    power play Member Full Member

    286
    14
    Nov 11, 2006
    hopkins knock calzaghe down and still went back??
     
  6. socrates

    socrates THE ORIGINAL... Full Member

    7,559
    3
    Sep 30, 2008
    obviously,he lost.

    lol.
     
  7. DanePugilist

    DanePugilist God vs God - Death Angel Full Member

    6,837
    2
    Oct 14, 2006
    No, Hopkins fought the right fight, and Calzaghe due to arrogance fought the wrong fight. Fact is, that Calzaghe is just a better fighter at this point.
     
  8. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    i think that he fought the perfect fight and did as well as he could have at this age.

    if anything, it was Calzaghe who fought the wrong fight against Hopkins, but he still did enough to win it.
     
  9. klion22

    klion22 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,781
    355
    Aug 4, 2007
    I think if you asked Hopkins this question AFTER he fought Pavlik, he would say he did fight the wrong fight. Even in his post fight interview with Merchant after the Pavlik fight, he said that he will be a lot more aggressive from now on whoever he fights. And he did say that he was willing to fight Calzaghe again.

    In the first fight, he played it safe. He tried to minimize the action. But at the same time, what he did was completely waste his tank by constantly being on the move. He let Calzaghe dictate the pace. If he stood his ground more and initiated the action more, he would not only conserve his wheels but he might get the better of the exchanges and he would actually have a chance at a UD or maybe even a KO.
     
  10. IrnBruMan

    IrnBruMan Obsessed with Boxing banned

    16,385
    1
    Apr 8, 2006
    Calzaghe didn't allow Hopkins to fight any other fight that night.

    BTW, Hopkins fought Tarver like he did Pavlik, so the OP theory is wrong.