Did Joe Louis' comeback damage his legacy ?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by cuchulain, Jan 23, 2016.


  1. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,265
    11,322
    Jan 6, 2007
    As it stands, some have him as the GOAT in HW boxing and most everyone else has him at #2.

    Had he stayed retired with one (avenged) defeat, would a clear majority have him at # 1 ?
     
  2. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,903
    7,636
    Mar 17, 2010
    It's not the actual comeback that damages his legacy, it was peoples perception of it. Today, it's a normal sight to see a modern fighter box until he's too old and gets KO'd. With Louis it was a new phenomenon to many people. And I think it shocked a lot of people to see Louis KO'd, and it stuck in many peoples minds.

    On one hand his comeback elevates his greatness in my eyes. On the other, I can't help but think I might perceive him better if he retired after KOing Walcott.
     
  3. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,535
    Apr 26, 2015
    Louis came back because he was screwed by the IRS. This in no way damages his legacy as an ATG at the highest level.
     
  4. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,265
    11,322
    Jan 6, 2007
    No need to explain, BE.

    I am sufficiently familiar with your typing style (with or without a SPACEBAR) that I knew exactly what you meant to say.
     
  5. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,639
    18,433
    Jun 25, 2014

    Yes. Losses don't help anyone. A loss by knockout certainly doesn't.

    Joe's comeback didn't include any wins that enhanced his legacy.

    Losing to Charles and Marciano didn't elevate him in any way.
     
  6. The Mongoose

    The Mongoose I honor my bets banned

    24,478
    128
    Aug 13, 2009
    Louis picked up good wins in his comeback in Savold, Brion, and Bivins.

    The loses to Charles and Marciano have rarely been used to discredit him. Very respectable losses for an aging great.
     
  7. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,486
    46,012
    Feb 11, 2005
    I'm very much a proponent of judging fighter on their prime performances. Fighters should not be rewarded simply because they know when to retire nor conversely be punished for not knowing when to hang it up.
     
  8. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,265
    11,322
    Jan 6, 2007
    So Roy cracks your top ten, then ? :D
     
  9. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    Doesnt hurt his legacy to me at all.
     
  10. Dubblechin

    Dubblechin Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,639
    18,433
    Jun 25, 2014
    I disagree. Cesar Brion was a nobody. Bivins had already been beaten 20 times. He was nothing after the war.

    They didn't make up for the losses to Charles and Marciano.

    If Louis had retired at 58-1 as undisputed heavyweight champion ... and remained retired ... having beaten everyone he'd ever faced ... he'd have been viewed differently.

    Nobody would've picked Charles or Marciano to beat a prime Louis in mythical matchups. (There'd be no images of an old, balding Louis getting hammered by both.)

    The losses hurt his legacy. No question. The comeback did nothing to improve upon retiring as undisputed champ at 58-1.
     
  11. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
    So what? Most people still wouldnt pick charles or rocky to beat him prime for prime. Even at that late stage he was still able to beat the vadt majority of hevyweights in the world with little more than his jab. Peopke today just focus too much on win vs loss ratio which is pointless and largely a byproduct of todays overprotected fighters. Its not like hes roy jones who never fought anyone in his prime and then starts getting knocked out by every cab driver with a pair of boxibg gloves. Louis was outpointed by a prime hofer and ****ed that guys face up in the process and stopped by another prime hofer and ****ed that guys face up also. For a guy who was old and fighting just for the payday ill take that while hes beating legitimate contenders. To me its unfortunate louis had to do that but mire fighters than not do as well and louis performed better than most. It certainly doesnt diminish the towering titan he was in his prime.
     
  12. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,683
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004
    In a minor way, yes.
     
  13. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,265
    11,322
    Jan 6, 2007
    So where does he sit on your top HW list, Klompton, assuming you engage in such speculative pastimes ?
     
  14. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,974
    5,432
    Feb 10, 2013
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,486
    46,012
    Feb 11, 2005
    If Roy had better career planning and quit after,Ruiz, he would be on a lot of people's top ten.