Because Lewis's entire career for the most part was based on fights that never came off, because the Bowes, Tyson's and Holyfields were ducking him. Sure maybe that was a small part of it, but most likely it was for the very same reason he didnt want to fight the Ruiz's and the Byrds of his reign. It was too much risk for too little reward. Lewis was always a force, but he drew very little financially unless matched against another marquee name. He couldnt sell out an arena and be on PPV fighting the Bruce Seldons of the world. But Lewis campainged himself, as the world champion who takes on any fighter any styles, didnt matter, he would beat them all. To me Ruiz, and Byrd, represented the toughest challenges for him as a champion at that time, more so than Vitali Klitscko, Tyson or Kirk Johnson. Both were proven fighters, with awkward tough styles to crack.
i agree, lewis-byrd would look a lot like wlad-byrd I+II. not sure about the knockdowns but a good possibility.
Lewis would have knocked out Chris Byrd and John Ruiz on the same night. He did not fight either of them, because the rewards were not high enough and he was getting old and lacking motivation to fight in general. Neither Byrd nor Ruiz posed him any threat in his own mind, and therefore he had not motivation to fight them unless the figures were good. The figures were very poor, therefore the fight was pointless.
I don't agree with the same night thing - I think both would have been difficult fights for him - but I would have picked him to win both. This constitutes a duck, perhaps?
Why do so many people assume just because Wlad had an easy time with Byrd Lewis would? Lewis doesnt have the same style as Wlad.. Hes shorter, doesnt fight as tall or move backwards as much and doesnt possess the speed that Wlad has. If all of Wladmirs opponents fought him from the outside he would probably never lose. Byrd would have been able to get a lot closer to Lewis in my opinion, and Ruiz for sure would have presented an ugly fight with his jab right hand grab style.
McGrain, I was just responding to Brighton Bomber's comment about "few people" demanding to see that fight. My point was that almost no one was calling for it. I would not have objected to Byrd getting a shot at the title. I think he had done everything according to the rules to position himself for one. I guess he deserved it as much as a lot of guys who get title shots. I have nothing against Byrd, who is a Michigan guy and someone I pull for. I don't think Lewis would have had much of a problem with him, however. On another topic, that's a cool avatar you have.
Sure. That's a good summary of how I feel about it, too. Basically I think Lewis should have entertained him. That's poor old Patterson he's staring down. Liston gets a look at the man in possesion of the thing he wants more than anything else. Wouldn't want to be that man.
Byrd fought his way into the title shot, and certainly deserved a crack at Lewis. Byrd himself wanted to fight Lewis not the next available contender.
When did he duck these guys exactly? After Ruiz lost to Holyfield (Who Lewis had spanked a yr or two before) or after Ruiz lost to the former Middleweight and was the laughing stock of the sport? Another time maybe when Lewis had just lost to Rahman...yeah, rather than avenge maybe he should have challenge the "Quiet Man" :nut That would have been great for his legacy atsch
Yes I think he deserved a shot but not until 2003. Byrd lost to Ibeacbuchi in 1999, lost the Wlad in 2000 and it was only after he beat Tua in 2001 and Holyfield at the end of 2002 that he was really a top contender. Lewis only had the 1 fight in 2003 against Vitali, then he retired.