More than enough circumstancial evidence and chain of events stuff to assume guilt. In my opinion. Lets not forget he was banned for a year.
Banned for a year for a separate incident. There's just as much circumstantial evidence and chain of events stuff to support his innocence. The difference is like to assume innocence until guilt can be proven and in this case it simply hasn't been.
I have to laugh at the people who say yes BUT it would not have made a difference . . . lol! Crazy!!! Of course he only tried to use the bricks against SSM rather than the man who just beat SSM. Of course margos . . . slow ass weak punches was more than enough to rip Cotto's ear off! The guy is a thug who should never be allowed to fight again! I hope he doesn't get medical clearance! **** I hate Arum! I think Cotto is damage goods since the mugging he took at the hands of ******* margocheato . . . and will probably lose the rematch. Then you will have a bunch of idiots jumping up and saying "this proves that he never cheated" . . . Morons!
Very true! You already have idiots saying that if Margarito wins it proves that he didn't cheat on his first fight with Cotto. Instead of thinking that problaby Cotto is just not the same or is not trainning as hard or so many other reasons than to think that if Cotto loses is becasue Margarito was not cheating. So if Cotto wins that means Margarito was cheating? :-( Viceversa with Margarito, maybe he is also damaged goods after the Pac fight, we don't know. But the fact is that more than likely, based on his contradictions and his acts, he did cheat against Cotto.
For you and your peoples sake i hope Cotto wins or else you're gonna be taking so much **** from us. Anyway, i believe Cotto will win this one due to Margo's eye problems. But thats alright, you dudes deserve a win after the ass whooping we've been giving you this year. :deal 2011: PR ---> :vonnecunt <--- Mex :hi:
Probably. His whole career with Capetillo is questioned. I know people say NSAC forces you to use fresh gauze but **** these pads got past the CSAC who's to say NSAC wouldn't notice either?
yep he wore them and probably wore them for most of his other fights.Experience gained by romoving his gloves at the end from previous fights must have given him an air of security at the of the Cotto fight.
I believe he did: I cant see a reason why they would start using plaster against Mosley who he was a big favorite against when he won the fight before against the no1 guy in the division (Mayweather was retired then, right???) and Mosley had looked like **** in his last fight. People can point out that his training camp was bad but he still looked in decent shape and I don't think he looked that much worse than he usually did, it was just a bad stylistic fight for him. As for the red marking on the wrap, my only question is how often does a boxer use that same part of the wrap, i would imagine they would change it with every fight.