Did mike ever fight someone who could jab or move as good as douglas?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Jan 13, 2012.


  1. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,072
    21,590
    Sep 15, 2009
    I've always been of the "tokyo mike sucked" point of view in the past, but i'm watching the documentary "mike tyson's most shocking effect" on espn classic. I tended to be of the opinion that tyson wins 9 out of 10 and douglas just caught lightening in a bottle but i'm really not so sure anymore.

    I could well be tending more towards the "kryptonite" theory in that someone who could jab and move as effectively as buster did would have a decent shot at beating iron.

    I'm not saying that douglas would always beat tyson but by the same stretch I don't think we should assume that tyson would always beat douglas. Based on the evidence we have (tyson getting his arse kicked) I think it's fair to say this style would always have caused him problems.

    Makes me rethink my previous stance on matchups between him and ali/holmes/lewis in particular.

    Any thoughts?
     
  2. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,026
    25,087
    Jan 3, 2007
    Although not in the best shape for Tyson, Tony Tubbs was looking quite mobile in there for a while and was a career boxer with highly regarded skills.. Biggs could stick and move pretty well too, as could Tucker.. And of course, I almost forgot Carl Williams, but who didn't last long enough to get anything going.
     
  3. PowerPuncher

    PowerPuncher Loyal Member Full Member

    42,723
    268
    Jul 22, 2004
    No, he didn't, I've told you Douglas had a perfect blueprint and I'm glad you're seeing the light LUFC. It wasn't just the jab and movement, it was the angles, timing counters on the way in and smashing with uppercuts on the inside. The combinations were simply brilliantly fluid too. Douglas was also very big, very rangy, massive shoulders, his father was a great trainer

    Tucker, Tubbs, Holmes, Biggs, Williams all tried to do the same, but I don't think any of them did it nearly as well as Douglas.

    Douglas was and is an enigma

    BTW kudos to you for having an open mind on the matter
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,072
    21,590
    Sep 15, 2009
    I think whilst the holmes victory was very great for tyson, the 78-82 version of larry was much better in terms of movement and fluidity.

    Tyson just doesn't look bad in this fight, douglas just looks amazing.
     
  5. Conn

    Conn Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    1,577
    53
    Jun 16, 2011
    no one ever doubted that the man to beat Tyson would need a good reach, a hard fast accurate well-timed jab, and good lateral movement

    no one thought it would be douglas. but the blueprint was known

    the only other type was a big strong bomber like a young Foreman who might catch Tyson coming in with knockout blows. but most those types tend to be too slow
     
  6. Lester1583

    Lester1583 Can you hear this? Full Member

    4,426
    27
    Dec 18, 2008
    They all fought Rooney-Tyson, PP.

    Except Williams who always was a sucker for a left hook - even Tua has a chance to put him away in 1 round.
     
  7. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,032
    Sep 5, 2004
    Well Pinklon Thomas had a pretty good jab and in their actual fight was able to win 2 rounds before being stopped in the 6th despite getting rocked in the first round.

    Tony Tucker had a decent jab and could move. So did Tyrell Biggs for that matter who was doing fairly well in the first round with his "Muhammad Ali" rendition until Tyson caught him and slowly broke him down over the course of the fight.

    Douglas even if he shows up in the same condition as he did in Tokyo wouldn't beat a better prepared Tyson. Tyson fought lazily, had low activity and allowed Douglas to set the pace of the fight. Tyson was dancing to music Douglas was playing where as it's usually the other way around.

    Boxing is very subtle, the difference between what happened in Tokyo against Douglas vs what happened against Biggs is that Tyson did not impose his will on Douglas. He was far too patient and ended up fighting Buster's fight.

    Tyson as a result of his speed and power typically has the edge early in the fight because he has the ability to hurt guys early. Hurt not stun; and essentially what I mean is that guys who feel Tyson's explosive power early tend to mute their own offense to some degree. It is the reason why nobody has ever come from behind to beat Tyson. If they beat him it's because they were able to set the pace early.

    A rematch would have seen Tyson correct the mistake.
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,072
    21,590
    Sep 15, 2009
    I actually disagree and I think tyson's successes in the fight against douglas came when buster took his eye off the ball and got complacent.

    Maybe if tyson was better prepared he'd have done better, but then again what is douglas was better prepared even still?

    Based on the evidence we have there's no reason to write off buster's chances.

    Sure tyson's head movement wasn't quite as good as it seemed to be earlier in his career but it could be that he never fought as tall and accurate a puncher as douglas earlier in his career.

    The fight they did have is as good a barometer as we have for predicting a fantasy fight between the two.

    Tyson couldn't walk through buster's punches and he had to respect his power. Great fight by both men, greater fight by douglas.
     
  9. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    Larry Holmes comes to mind
     
  10. choklab

    choklab cocoon of horror Full Member

    27,674
    7,653
    Dec 31, 2009
    Good post. However, I belive Douglas put Tyson out of his comfort zone because he was having success. Douglas was in the zone! He had Tyson where Tyson wanted his victims to be -Tyson was the one who was discouraged because each time he drew a jab from buster it was a feint. Tyson paid for buying feints all night and was stepping into punching range naked.

    Tyson could not produce "explosion" or "wild tenacity" on a whim because it required the other guy being frozen with confusion or being down right discouraged. Douglas was neither confused or discouraged so Tyson never got out of the blocks. A fully or adequately trained Tyson would still be discouraged if he was getting hit each time he tried anything.

    Maybe Douglas could not be that driven again and maybe he would have become discouraged in a rematch. The Tokyo win was a lifes work at the end of an 8 year journey.
     
  11. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,072
    21,590
    Sep 15, 2009
    The larry who tyson fought wasn't as good a mover as douglas nor could he make him respect his power.
     
  12. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,423
    1,464
    Sep 7, 2008
    No, Tokyo Douglas would not beat Kid Dynamite.
     
  13. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    3,255
    134
    Feb 6, 2009
  14. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010
    I recently watched the fight and think it is one of the most overrated wins ever. Douglas was looking good against a punchbag basically.

    Tyson was very slow and sloppy.
     
  15. Guyfawkes

    Guyfawkes Than who was phone?! Full Member

    1,446
    8
    Jul 18, 2011
    People make alot of excuses for Tyson, but the fact is he was dominated and ktfo in his prime by Buster Douglas