Did more people believe Fury won the first Wilder fight after the second fight was over?

This guy has serious mental health issues, no joke,,,

 

You are literally the only person saying this. I don’t recall one article or boxing expert saying Canelo was robbed. Keep living in your little safe delusional world. People who live in reality mostly disagree with you. Im done here. You can’t argue crazy people into being sane. Was just trying to help you understand. It’s obvious you are beyond help.

 

Crying robbery and throwing temper tantrums when a decision doesn't go your way isn't a sign of sanity. I didn't agree with the result, but I accepted the decision like a normal person. Your idea is I'm crazy because I didn't scream robbery? Immature people throw a hissy fit over a decision. Sane people accept it, keep their composure and don't spaz out all the time like you're doing now. If you're as sane as you claim to be, you should be secure enough to respect my differing viewpoint about who deserved victory, and be able to discuss it rationally. Anyone who refuses to acknowledge how close that first fight was and how difficult many rounds were to score is not being honest about what happened. Intelligent people can respectfully disagree over the scoring of an obviously close match, but anyone who refuses to admit it was close can't be taken seriously.

 

Trust me you are not sane. Weren’t you just crying robbery over clenelo not getting the decision he didn’t deserve in the first fight. Do you have any friends or do you just sit in the basement thinking of crazy **** to say? I wish you all the best and hope you get the help you sorely need. I blame myself for engaging in this discussion.

 

I'm afraid you're the one who needs help. You're acting belligerent in your irrational comdemnation of my perfectly reasonable viewpoint that Canelo won the first match. But of course I have never cried robbery as I'm not an insecure fanboy and I don't live and die by the results of boxing decisions. I was OK with the decision even though I disagreed with it. That's what a mature person does. A mature person, accepts the reality, talks about what happened intelligently and respects others who may see it differently. I suggest you learn to be more respectful of others who see close fights differently from you. You spazzing out and acting like it wasn't a close fight or that it was so clear of a GGG win that it can't even be debated is obviously insane and with such a outlandish and skewed viewpoint it's hard to take you seriously.

 

I was going to just say we can just agree to disagree about this one but you make it hard to be nice. It’s hilarious to see someone like you accuse another person of being skewed. Good luck to you because you are going to need it.

 

Wilder won 2 rounds in the first fight which were the knockdown rounds. Not a domination like the second fight but it was a clear win none the less for Fury. Not even debatable.

 

Bad argument. Corrupt Judges dont take away the fact that Canelo should have lost had all the judges been fair. If somebody receives a 1 sided beating yet gets a draw on the cards you could say the reality is that the fight ended up being a draw, but should it have been a draw ? No

 

Whether it should be a draw is one thing, but don't claim reality is what you say it is when the reality is what it was. It wasn't a 1 sided beating, it was a very close match that could have went eiter way. In such a close competitive fight, a draw is reasonable.

 

Who said I was trying to equate the two matches? Reading comprehension isn't your strong point, is it? The only thing in common is that they were judged incorrectly. Just because you are a moron and find fights difficult to score doesn't mean others are like you.

Go back to talking to your imaginary friend and leave boxing to people who know what they are doing.

 

I can tell you're still torn up over the decision. Understandable, but there's no need for you to get all bent out of shape about it. You're trying to act like Fury Wilder 1 was on par with Canelo GGG 1. Fury arguably won every round besides the two rounds that he was knocked down in. There's an argument that Wilder maybe won 2 or 3 rounds max. That's much different than Canelo GGG 1 where Canelo won rounds 1-3 & 10-12 and arguably round 4, 5 or 6. So unlike Wilder, Canelo wasn't losing every round and needed two late knockdowns just to have a chance at getting a draw. Canelo actually came out of the gate winning rounds and built a lead early on. And unlike Wilder, who was getting beaten to the punch and clearly outlanded and outbox in pretty much every round, Canelo landed the better cleaner harder punches on GGG in pretty much every round. Sorry, I'm not gonna let you get away with trying to act like Canelo GGG 1 was anywhere near as one-sided as Wilder Fury 1 was. That's total nonsense.

 

It was close but not that close, imo GGG was robbed

 

Canelo won rounds 1-3 & 10-12. Then you have rounds 4, 5 and 6 each of which could go either way. Learn to score.

 

Thats almost exactly my scorecard. I have it 115-113 GGG. Canelo won rounds 1-3 and 10-12 and GGG won every other round. It was closw but it was clear GGG should have gotten the nod.

 

Seriously, stop derailing threads

Yes someone mentioned Canelo but still look how you changeca thread when this happens