Did more people believe Fury won the first Wilder fight after the second fight was over?

Your score adds up to a draw.

 

No it doesn't. That adds up to Canelo winning 5 out of 12 rounds and GGG winning 7 out of 12 rounds. Meaning GGG won. I made a spelling mistake, i meant 10 and 12 not 10 through 12

 

Did more people believe Joshua won the first Ruiz fight after the second fight was over?

 

Yeah elementary school math that you added up wrong. Canelo won rounds 1-3 & 10-12. That's rounds 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, 12 to Canelo. That's 6 rounds to Canelo, not 5.

 

Anyway it's clear GGG should have won. I like Canelo but i am not a fanboy, for example to this day you still haven't accepted that Mayweather schooled Canelo low difficulty

 

Look man I'm not gonna beat you over the head with that. You typed 10-12 but you meant 10 and 12, not 11. No worries, so you gave GGG round 11, OK that's fine but even if you gave GGG Round 11 that was not a clear GGG round. That was a closer round that most people gave to Canelo. So you scoring a close round 11 for GGG instead of Canelo turns a draw into a close GGG win, therefore a draw is not unreasonable. So stop claiming this was a clear GGG win or that a draw was unreasonable based on you scoring a close round 11 to GGG.

And rounds 4, 5 and 6 were not clear GGG rounds either. Any one of those rounds could have gone to Canelo also. At the end of the day, we agree on most rounds, that Canelo won rounds 1-3, 10 and 12. We disagree maybe on two rounds, round 4 and round 11. I gave GGG round 5 and thought round 6 was a toss-up. So our view of the match is not worlds apart, we just diagree on a couple rounds. No biggie, no reason to get your panties all up in a bunch. There's no reason why we can't respect each other's score and view on who won based on the scoring of a couple of close rounds.

 

No it's not a clear GGG win. You said yourself that Canelo won 5 rounds, and you gave GGG round 11 a round that most people had for Canelo and was far from a clear GGG round. Then you have rounds 4, 5 and 6, each were close and could go either way.

And now you're trying to change the subject back to Canelo Mayweather. Stop deflecting, you had it 115-113 GGG, based on your scoring of a close round 11 to GGG. That's not a clear win. Why do you continue this charade? It was a close match, a draw or a close win either way is perfectly reasonable.

 

No, plenty of people don't.

 

Bro, I'm not trying to derail threads, but this is important. This needs to be hammered home, and like you said I'm not the one bringing up Canelo here. The first GGG fight continues to be brought up as an example of a robbery, which is bonkers. What I just accomplished with Markus right there was very useful. As you can see Markus and I agree on most rounds, our scoring only differs when it came to round 11 and round 4, which were both objectively close, hard to score rounds. But yet he can't bring himself to admit that a draw or a Canelo win is reasonable. This is GGG propaganda, brainwashing, group think and peer pressure all wrapped into one.

It's illogical to come to the conclusion that Canelo won 5 rounds as Markus did, then at the same time claim that a draw is somehow unreasonable when all that is needed to make it a draw is a round to flip like round 11 or 4, 5 or 6. At the end of the day, Markus and I scorecard is not that different, we only disagree on the scoring of a round or two. I am NOT interested in derailing topics, but when this fight gets brought up and called a robbery, I don't care what topic it is, this BS needs to be called out and an accurate acocunt of what happened and how close those critical rounds were need to be hammered home. The end result is that you can say you thought GGG won, I have no problem with that. But don't try to claim that it was a robbery or that a draw or a close Canelo win is unreasonable. That's complete BS and insulting to everyone's intelligence.

 

Its really not that important

And if it is hey start a thread

 

Yes it is, and I can only respond directly to a post when it occurs in whatever topic it occurs in. I understand you not wanting to see topics like this be derailed into more Canelo GGG rehashes, but maybe instead of coming at me, you look at the posters who still perpetuate robbery BS, so we can nip the problem in the bud. And for what it's worth, I let plenty of stuff slide on here to let topics breathe. I try to tread carefully so not to ruffle any feathers, but sometimes you need to speak up and say something where it is warranted and can be effective.

 

Its not


Its only important to you

As you will

 

It's not important to me, it's important to the sport of boxing so that history is accurately reflected and not whitewashed due to biased group think.

 

BS

History will not be written on a forum

Its important to you, no shame in admitting it