Did Roy Jones start losing at LHW when his competition stepped up?

You must be one thick guy, your post says EDIT. And I got it before you edited it.

You missed out half of my post here also:-
http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=13591125&postcount=1141

I never went into calling you names for that, although it was an act of a coward, as I can understand removing some parts of the posts.

Anyway lets proceed in a thrashing.

 

The edit was on a minute after - 5:48pm

You quoted it at 5:53pm atsch

You posts are filled with useless crap, from what I can gather, you've asked two main questions, you've had answers for both, and have completely neglected to try and engage in a debate. Instead, you've continued to post nonsense to deflect attention from the thrashing Joe.Boxer has given you all over this thread. All the way back to when you tried to trace the lineage and ended up with Nathan Cleverly :rofl:rofl

 

Because I know that would **** off any RJJ hater.

RJJ was seen as more superior than Mayweather, its a fact.

So you know accept, that your comments made earlier were not entirely true:-

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12341610&postcount=511

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12349108&postcount=532

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12388907&postcount=788

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12390118&postcount=807

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=13575533&postcount=976

I have proven that not all vacant lineal championships are won by the top 2 boxing it off in the ring, hence proving your statement above to not be entirely true.

 

lol, I know man. If realsoujla didn't realize that nothing in boxing ( e.g. the Lineal or Ring championship policy) is 100% water-tight, which has always been pointed out, he should've just said so, instead of trying to claim I was the one who was wrong. He's a lying spinner.

 

The only thing you've proved is how you deceitfully lie and spin to try and make a false accusation.

 

Looks like you are more stupid than first imagined.

At 5:47 I click quote.
At 5:48 you edit your post
At 5:53 I post a reply
At 5:55 you accuse me of ducking the edited part of your post
At 5:57 I explain I got the quote before you edited it.
At 6:01 you begin sucking off Joe.Boxer again
At 6:10 I post this

And now I will go and prepare the response to your edit. I don't duck, you have ducked the stuff regarding Calzaghe from yesterday, and I had to put it on your face for you to finally man up and step up to the plate.

You are using time wasting tactics to delay getting battered.

I should have cut out this part coz it is nothing but ***** street rantings falling out of your mouth and onto the keyboard.

The amount of **** that has just come out of your mouth, 12 rolls of toilet tissue wouldn't be able to clean that mess. Your ***** street rantings are probably the worse in the forum.

There would be a simple way of ending and make it far less humiliating for you Cockout spastic.

Admit, Calzaghe was not a blown up SMW. And admit Calzaghe was not shot.

 

A simple yes/no question.

Do you accept that the Vacant Lineal Championship is not always decided by the top 2 in a weight division?

One word answer, Yes or No

 

Now he's backed into a corner, so he's just continuing to post nonsense ******

It took you 5 minutes to type that up!? :rofl atsch

Yes you have ducked me, you muppet you couldn't answer back to the names I gave you on RJJ - Collins, Liles and Nunn

You're yet to respond to the quote from Calzaghe, where he admits he 'he didn't want to box anymore, he lost his hunger'.

Understand something, when a boxer doesn't want to fight anymore, and he's lost all his hunger then he's pretty much finished. Anyone will tell you that.

 

Yes, other than in rare exceptional circumstances.
I'll give you another interesting example. Mosley was regarded as becoming Lineal for thrashing Margacheato. Margacheato was #1 and Mosley #3. Margacheato however was fresh off thrashing #2 (Cotto), so Margacheato-Mosley was accepted as Lineal. And why wasn't Margacheato-Cotto recognized as Lineal? Because they weren't top 2 at the time. Margacheato was rated lower iirc.

 

realsoulja is shadier than a used car salesman.
Team Elite and the Chincheckers are admirably trying to educate the masses for the good of the sport, while realsoulja is deceitfully just trying to lie and spin the good work of others with the tiny hope of gaining some kind of desperate perverse debate win. Not good. Not good at all.

 

You call it nonsense and at the same time rush to read it so much. atsch

You call it nonsense and at the same time answer it within a minute. And complain when I take a little longer to answer yours:-

:rofl

I answered to the best of my ability, I simply stated I am not sure why RJJ didn't fight them.

No fan can be 100%, I am just man enough to admit it. You ***** fan boys go around chanting and screaming and claim you are 100% sure why RJJ didn't face Steve Collins.

That is the difference between me and you, I admit something I don't know, and I also admit when I am wrong. That is the difference between a man and a *****. A ***** never accepts she is wrong.

That response will come in due time, another difference between me and you.

I am a man of patience, while you have shown impatience.

You should learn more from boxing than fighting my son. Sometimes being impatient gets you knocked out.

Had Thomas Hearns remained patient against Marvin Hagler, and opted not to go toe to toe he may have weathered the storm and may have done better than getting KTFO in the 3rd round.

Floyd Mayweather didn't want to fight any more in 2007 after beating Ricky Hatton. He then comes back and becomes a P4P great, and establishes why he is one of the greatest that ever lived.

Bernard Hopkin's didnt want to fight anymore after losing to Taylor, he comes back and shows why he is also one of the greatest that ever lived.

Chris Eubank didn't want to fight anymore, he comes back and gives Calzaghe a decent test and takes Carl Thompson into the trenches.

Point being:- (And I put it down in capital letters)

JUST BECAUSE A FIGHTER SAYS HE HAS LOST HIS HUNGER DOESN'T MEAN HE IS SHOT

 

The question was asked:-

Do you accept that the Vacant Lineal Championship is not always decided by the top 2 in a weight division?

:deal

 

Yes as it is always decided between the top 2, other than in exceptional circumstances.

 

I admit, I cut out the rest of your post, (GOON)

So when the context is RJJ Calzaghe is not shot, but when the context is Dawson Calzaghe is shot

When the context is RJJ Calzaghe is not blown up, but when the context is Dawson Calzaghe is blown up

You comment made earlier is bull****:-

http://www.eastsideboxing.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12299183&postcount=406

Calzaghe was not blown up, nor was he shot.:deal

 

You don't know, that's the end of it.

Have you ever stepped into a ABC, put on a pair of gloves, learnt how to move and box, and stepped into a ring and sparred proper rounds with others?

So what? They came back because they wanted to. Hence, they did want to box again.

When a fighter says he doesn't want to do it anymore, and starts cutting corners, he's finished.

Case in point, Calzaghe has never returned, he was done with the game, finished.

Now you're going to look really ****ing stupid if you continue down this path, because you've already lost.