Did stiverne throw the fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Forza, Jan 17, 2015.


  1. bigbeatbaby

    bigbeatbaby Active Member Full Member

    928
    1
    Apr 29, 2012
    You know nothing. cynical p o s
     
  2. Staminakills

    Staminakills Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,329
    2,095
    Jun 8, 2012
    the ONE time he was stopped he quit on his stool because he was completely out of shape, untrained for that fight and exhausted.

    never close to being stunned in that previous fight.

    wilder had him badly, badly hurt at least twice and stunned almost every round. wilder beat the sh!t out of him and I was SHOCKED he never went down and make it to the end.

    very very tough mofo, give credit where credit is due and stop the nonsense, fix here fix there BS
     
  3. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,749
    1,239
    Dec 19, 2014
    Every boxer can be stopped by a nobody especially in the heavy weight divisions. One unexpected punch can end everything when you fight giants. Adonis Stevenson got his only defeat against a total nobody. And if you watch the fight Stiverne lost, If I'm not wrong, it was an unfair technical decision where Stiverne was perfectly fine to continue. He wasn't down, he was receiving a punch spree with his guards up.

    And no, he did not throw the fight. The kind of punches he received would KO most heavy weights, even those with the best chins, he withstood nevertheless. It's just that monsters over 2m/6'6'' need a seperate division. When the likes of Wilder, Wlad, Fury, Wach, Helenius, Valuev etc fight people half foot shorter than them, it's like they fight someone who belongs to a different weight class, and the reach difference makes it almost impossible for the short boxer to pose any serious threat (unless of course he's a nature's freak like Mike Tyson)
     
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,354
    Jun 29, 2007
    He showed poor stamina, did not cut off the ring, and did not seem to want it. The judges cards were a joke. Wilder won, but not by the margin they said.

    This to me suggests the rounds Stiverne likely won were given to Wilder early...just in case.

    Impossible to say if it was fixed, but there were signs of a dis-interested fighter and bad judging.
     
  5. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,036
    27,681
    Jul 26, 2004
  6. conraddobler

    conraddobler Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,853
    148
    Mar 7, 2010
    so the "dis-interested" fighter won more rounds than he was supposed to in your opinion?

    What on earth could that mean? Either he was disinterested [sic] or he wasn't.
     
  7. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    Good take.

    He showed some amazing poise not to be lured into when he had Stiverne on the backfoot.

    The way he took a step back instead of forward in the 5th I think.....man.....that took a LOT of maturity, especially since the 4th was the rd Stiverne had his success in and looked to be a turning point.

    But Wilder kept his wits.....stayed back, and fought a perfect fight from the back foot.:think
     
  8. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    123,064
    35,183
    Jun 23, 2005
    No he fought just like he always does. Comes forward behind a guard low work rate looking to counter and loading up. He also faced an extreme reach disadvantage with someone with a good jab good hand speed and pop.
     
  9. shavers

    shavers Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,274
    388
    Jul 21, 2004
    THen all Wlads opponents should be accused of the same. Wilder gave Stiverne same kind of beatdown Wlad usually gives his opponents, but when its him its worldclass boxing...:-(
     
  10. STB

    STB #noexcuses Full Member

    15,486
    41
    Mar 26, 2014
    Every single time theres a big fight, I see one of these threads the next day...
     
  11. chitownfightfan

    chitownfightfan Loyal Member Full Member

    34,569
    1,280
    May 31, 2010
    If there was a FIX in.....it was by both camps.

    The odds on the under were too delicious to pass on, and with Stiverne the UD and paying almost 2-1........


    If there is an immediate rematch.....they we can start to make claim the fight MAY have been fixed.

    I would not put it past the parties involved to have dumped a ton of money on the over and Wilder through the back door since all the late money came in on Stiverne and the steady flow of under $$$$ kept those over odds moving North.

    Anyone who picked 10 over or decision made a ton of $$$$$.:think:think:think
     
  12. Gneus7

    Gneus7 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,277
    495
    Mar 29, 2007
    I don't see any reason to believe he did. Stiverne just might not be that great and Wilder might be better than some thought he was. Also look at it stylistically, Wilder had a height, reach and speed advantage. Stiverne is shorter, slower, a plodder and doesn't look particularly fit. What happened in the fight makes some sense.
     
  13. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,385
    3,796
    Feb 20, 2008
    No. Stiverne looked like he was waiting on Wilder to tire out and it never happened. Wilder kept a good Jab in his face and tired Stiverne out kinda like Wlad does his opponents. Good strategy by Team Wilder.
     
  14. dellboi94

    dellboi94 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,111
    1,680
    Sep 3, 2013
    Wilder beats everyone apart from Wlad and Povetkin
     
  15. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Nah, Wilder just boxed better than expected and Stiverne had no real gameplan to counter it. Physically, he was just too sluggish as well. He was a 240 pounder moving like he weighed 265. Judging by the fight and the scores, any screwing of Stiverne would've been on the cards, not something he was in on.

    Gotta give due credit to Deontay for his development.