Did the exile hurt Ali's legacy or did it help it?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Bokaj, May 15, 2008.


  1. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,079
    12,992
    Jan 4, 2008
    I think a case can be made for both alternatives actually (even if most probably know what I personally think), so I would like to hear your opinions on this.
     
  2. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    37
    Jan 7, 2005
    It helped it, it allowed a new generation of heavys to establish a reputation. The wins against Foreman and Frazier look (are!) more impressive than if Ali had of met them as an established champ defending against undefeated Olympians.
     
    Boxingfan712 likes this.
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,079
    12,992
    Jan 4, 2008
    That is true.

    But don't you think that Ali would have had a very long reign as champ if not for the exile? I mean, he could have beaten both Louis's and Marciano's records.
     
  4. rendog67

    rendog67 The firestarter Full Member

    2,167
    1
    Apr 27, 2006
    hard to say i dont think any exile should help a fighters legacy there will be arguements for both, but im saying no
     
  5. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    37
    Jan 7, 2005
    I think he quite possibly could have beaten both records but his career would have been a lot less dramatic. Frazier and Forman would have been dismissed by historians as green kids who got rushed into a shot with an ATG and got exposed. With the retirement Foreman and Frazier had the chance to prove they are ATGs and THEN Ali beat them.

    So I guess from a cold stats point of view the break harmed Ali (it certainly deminished his skils) but when you look back at his complete career I think it helped him become what he his.
     
    Boxingfan712 likes this.
  6. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,044
    Oct 25, 2006
    From a physical standpoint it obviously hurt him, but from a legacy standoint it helped a lot.
     
    Boxingfan712 likes this.
  7. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,079
    12,992
    Jan 4, 2008
    When do you think that his reign would have ended if not for the exile? Against Frazier, Norton, Holmes, someone else? Would he have retired undefeated?
     
  8. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    400
    Jun 14, 2006
    From any standpoint, it hurt his legacy. In all probability, Ali wouldn't have lost for a long time, and the Frazier first would have been more competitive. It hurt his legacy.
     
  9. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    37
    Jan 7, 2005
    Hard to say, motivation might have gotten to be a problem and he could have lost to a lesser fighter. Of the guys you've listed I don't think Frazier would have beaten Ali at any point in there careers but for the layoff. Norton is a funny one, he seemed to have style to beat Ali after his layoff, maybe that would have been a style Ali would have had trouble with even without the layoff. Holmes in 77-78 would have a good shout.
     
  10. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    400
    Jun 14, 2006
    He would most likely find his first defeat in the form of Norton I, but even that is just speculation. Ali would have most certainly have a better record if not for the exile, that I'm almost certain of.
     
  11. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    37
    Jan 7, 2005
    I disagree, without the layoff Ali fights Frazier in 1969 and a champion in his prime beats a young challenger by comfortable UD . With the layoff Ali goes 2-1 with a fellow ATG when past him prime (its true to say Frazier was also shopworn for the 3rd fight). Far more impressive IMHO.
     
  12. bigjake

    bigjake Active Member Full Member

    1,385
    9
    Jul 19, 2004
    the exile made him even more popular,but it hurt him as a fighter.took away his best years i feel

    bigjake
     
  13. GazOC

    GazOC Guest Star for Team Taff Full Member

    61,460
    37
    Jan 7, 2005
    I think thats undisputable but for his legacy as a whole letting these young guys come up and prove themselves while he was retired and then coming back a beating them does a lot more for his legacy then a few extra wins and couple less loses.
     
  14. Azania

    Azania Active Member Full Member

    583
    45
    Oct 26, 2006
    I say it hurt him physically...but legacywise it helped him.If the Foreman fight had happened before exile,it would'nt have had the impact it did in Ali's career IMO.Even tho I think,an absolute prime Ali would have made George look silly in the ring.Too fast and too busy for George....would have got gassed just chasing Ali around that ring.

    And so yeah,the exile helped his legacy for sure.
     
  15. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,079
    12,992
    Jan 4, 2008
    But let's say that he never went into exile and ruled supreme for 14 years until he lost to Holmes in 1978 with 30+ defenses under his belt (I'm not saying he necessarily would reign that long, but if he did), could anyone dispute his standing as the nr. 1 HW? Wouldn't he have a good claim to be seen as one of the very best p4p, even?