Did The Petronelli's Lose Marvin His Crown?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mcvey, Sep 24, 2013.


  1. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    Going into the Leonard fight,.the three original judges proposed were Dave Moretti,Lou Fillipo ,and Harry Gibbs.The Petronelli's objected to Gibbs and asked for a Mexican judge, Gibbs was replaced with Jo Jo Guerra, and Gibbs flew back to the UK.

    The Petronelli' s were still sore about the way Hagler had been treated in the Uk when his dethronement of Alan Minter led to a riot and bottles being thrown into the ring .
    Ironically Guerra, who had got the call only at the Petronelli's insistence, turned in a lopsided score of 118-110 in favour of Leonard ,Fillipo scored it 115-113 for Hagler , but Moretti made it 115-113 for Leonard, which meant Hagler lost the fight, and his title.

    The punch line here is that Gibbs did not view the fight for a couple of weeks ,but when he finally saw it on TV. he scored it 8-4 for Hagler!


    ps Gibbs had been sitting next door but one to me on the night of the Hagler Minter riot, when the bottles began raining down he got up from his seat and went and stood in front of Terry Lawless's wife to shield her from them.

    So my question is ,did the Petronelli's lose Marvin his title? I gave the fight to Leonard, but it was very close imo.
     
  2. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,421
    Aug 22, 2004
    Gibbs probably scored it for Hagler out of spite. :bart

    Also, never trust a Mexican.
     
  3. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,812
    843
    Jul 25, 2008
  4. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    The Petronelli's by all accounts were very nice people, Marvin trusted them, and they did not let him down outside the ring. But inside the ring, they seemed very ordinary. Whether that was getting Hagler to take it easy against Vito in fight one, or devising tactics to facing prime Duran rather than 1983 160lbs Duran, that meant the fight was pick-em for a dozen rounds...
     
  5. Garrus

    Garrus Big Boss 1935-2014 Full Member

    4,909
    67
    Aug 27, 2010
    I remember reading about this in Four Kings. It's not like Hagler didn't have a say in it, it's as much his fault as theirs.
     
  6. LittleRed

    LittleRed Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,850
    239
    Feb 19, 2012
    Words to live by. Whenever my family asks me how I'm doing I always ask 'what have you heard?'
     
  7. Surf-Bat

    Surf-Bat Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,736
    97
    Jul 20, 2010
    I tend to look at them more as being the reason that Marvin wasn't actually GREATER than he was. Those guys weren't seasoned, top flight trainers like Ray Arcel and Eddie Futch. If Marvin would have been trained with one of those gents I can't see him ever having a stale performance such as he sometimes turned out. Antuofermo 1 would have been a TKO win for Marvin, so would Duran. Willie The Worm MIGHT have beaten him (Marvin was green and Monroe was pretty good).

    Pat and Goody did well with Marvin. But I believe he could have been even better.
     
  8. lora

    lora Fighting Zapata Full Member

    10,305
    544
    Feb 17, 2010
    I wonder if Lawless' wife gave Gibbs one for the road in return for his nobility?
     
  9. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    Thats a pretty tasteless remark. Terry and Sylvie were happily married for 53 years.
     
  10. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,352
    11,391
    Jan 6, 2007
    8-4-1 ?

    Did he score the stretching and shadowboxing before the first bell ?
     
  11. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    Sorry I made typo,hang on I'll go and cut my throat.
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,733
    29,083
    Jun 2, 2006
    I was unaware of their changing the judge, but wasn't impressed with their corner work in the Leonard fight. For such a close fight I thought they were far too laid back, and low key ,I think they should have been lighting a fire under Hagler's arse, impressing on him it was all to play for.
     
  13. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    36,352
    11,391
    Jan 6, 2007
    You don't need to do that, lad.

    Just tell us what Gibbs DID score it.
     
  14. AlFrancis

    AlFrancis Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,812
    843
    Jul 25, 2008
    :lol:
    I've got the highest respect for Harry but I can't see how he got it 8-4 for Hagler. Like someone else said maybe he just said that give the Petronelli's something to think about......or maybe he didn't!
     
  15. Anubis

    Anubis Boxing Addict

    5,802
    2,039
    Jun 14, 2008
    So far as rejecting a British judge, even Harry Gibbs, they had good reason to be wary after Roland Dakin's ridiculous scoring in Minter-Antuofermo I [which would have been a 150-135 shutout on his card if Vito's shoving of Alan to the deck in round 14 hadn't been ruled a knockdown by Carlos Padilla], followed by their own experience in dethroning Minter. Hagler had consulted with Vito following Antuofermo's experiences with Dakin, and then in London.

    Gibbs may have claimed to score it in Hagler's favor over SRL off the tape, but that's still not the same as scoring it from ringside, even if it was a sincere opinion after the fact. And Sal may well have a point about Gibbs making that claim out of spite after the way he was rejected by the Hagler camp.

    What's of more concern to me is that Hagler's camp cared at all who the judges were. They should have gone in with a conviction that they needed a knockout, and to hell with the scoring. Then, if it does get to the final bell, the cards might take care of themselves.



    The Petronellis got Hagler to where he got, from his 1969 beginning in boxing to SRL in 1987. Off-hand, I'm not sure of a longer such relationship aside from Clancy-Griffith.

    Marv had a different temperament than Griff, and the Petronellis were also different from flamboyant Irish Queens native Clancy in personality. Although the sons of Italian immigrants, they themselves were Brockton natives, and seem to very much have taken on the characteristic stoicism of the New Englander. Hagler was 13 years old when his mother moved her family to Brockton after the deadly 1967 Newark riots destroyed their tenement in the Central Ward. His personality was already formed.

    Having grown up without a father, the Petronellis became the closest thing to such a relationship he ever had. He was several years younger when he walked into their gym than Griffith was when he was brought to Clancy by the owner of the hat factory where he worked because of his natural physique. Emile wasn't enthusiastic about boxing, he had to be pushed into it. Hagler actively pursued it, and had to sell the Petronellis on his commitment.

    Fast forward 18 years later to SRL, and there's not really much they can do if he doesn't come in with that fire lit underneath him. They've now been together most of his life, and they're not the screamers Dundee usually is. [Angelo was pretty cool working with Foreman, but they were both well established, and George was the boss. Aside from Moore, I can't imagine Foreman being deferential to anybody during his comeback.] "Don't get cute, don't switch orthodox. Keep it simple Marv, and do what you do best. Don't fight his fight, fight YOUR fight!" I don't know what else they might have said to him to change things, as he had always been so much of a self starter.

    Yes, it's a business, but thinking of the PBF-Pac non-fight, they really didn't need SRL, and Hagler would have lost no credibility for rejecting his challenge in 1987. Ray offered an opportunity for a huge payday, but he doesn't make any himself without getting the fight. Hagler's team made ridiculous concessions just to get SRL in the ring, and that may be where he really lost his crown, by agreeing to larger gloves, a bigger ring, and shorter time limit. [In fact, they did lose his WBA crown in the process, as it was stripped just prior to SRL-Hagler, making this the first time the undisputed MW Title wasn't on the line since Monzon was stripped of WBC recognition in 1974 for not defending against Valdez. Since 1987, the MW Title has only been an undisputed title for around a year, when Hopkins finally re-consolidated it in 2004 before Jermain Taylor briefly took it. A disaster for boxing, as the MW Title had historically been the most enduring undisputed championship in the sport for over a century prior to SRL-Hagler.]