Did the referee skip 9?

Are some of you really that thick ?, ffs watch it again he clear as day says 9.................BUT lets be honest he was not even looking at him any way, he was looking at Frampton, so its his own fault.

 

Exactly. he made no attempt to get up until he'd been counted out. Surely to God no experienced boxer would leave it that late to start getting up.

 

The thing for me was the time between 9 and his decision to wave it off as there clearly wasn't a second between the two.

As I said earlier though it's largely irrelevant as Carl would always have won.

 

The person saying the count was outside the ring, when they said 9 the ref held up 10 fingers

I know its Cazares' fault but watch the refs fingers he goes from 8 to 10, he wasnt the one doing the count out loud

 

Count was fine. Irrelevant whether the ref went from 8 to 10 on his fingers as cazares wasn't even looking at his fingers, he just completely misjudged it and got legitimately counted out.

 

When the count got to nine Cazares was still looking away and not moving. He didn't move until he'd been counted out. That's not anyone's fault but himself.

 

Nothing wrong with the count, everything right with it.

 

He wanted none of it.

 

No boxer should be waiting until 9 before making a move off a knee.

Ref wasn't at fault on Friday night.

 

No. watched it backto confirm and clearly shows 9 with fingers

 

An' ten it was ova...

 

Have all you butthurt losers realised that the count was legitimate yet? the referee counted 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 OUT. From 1-10 took 12 seconds. and the ref clearly counted 9 if you watch the replay. Absolutely nothing wrong with this count.

 

Rules of Boxing : in all cases a boxer shall be considered down until he has regained his feet and is in a position to defend himself

the timekeeper will count to 10 which will coincide with the Referee,s OUT

ie: Timkeeper 8 9 10
Referee 8 9 OUT


count was fine

 

deal:deal

 

delete