Did the Thomas v Tyson bout in `87 proved Holyfield could have taken prime Tyson`s best shots?

Ok so not an out and out slugger then.

 

wrong he mostly was sluggar he picked certain parts everybody knows George was a slug

 

Well if he's a slugger than i ain't backing Tyson against him that's for sure.

 

Tyson barely ever fought a slugger and certainly none near George's class. He also never beat a prime ATG. Foreman took Frazier "slugger" very well. Tyson's great trainer who you hold in incredibly high regard told Tyson swarmers were suicide vs George.

 

Well his punches seemed to have a pretty
Devastating effect on Thomas at the end Mark.

 

Thomas had a helluva chin.

 

well your crazy then like most cause mike never got beat by a slugger

 

why do you crazy followers always try to put mike as a full swammer he wasnt he was a counterpucher watch matches it's like you people read a quote and think it fits for everybody it doesnt not everybody who has a certain style fights the same way

 

Stick and move, stick and move.

 

Stick and move, stick and move.

 

No

Thomas was faded but still had a very strong chin.

Prime Holyfield was badly hurt by Bert Cooper and Bowe. Tyson hit harder than Cooper and at least as hard as Bowe

 

Thomas at his peak could take a good punch, both Witherspoon and Coetzee failed to hurt him. He also took Weaver's bests hooks and came out on top. And unlike Bonecrusher and some other opponents, Thomas actually came to fight against Tyson.