Did Tyson put more on his shots v Berbick than he did v Holy?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Nov 13, 2019.



  1. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member Full Member

    48,281
    35,094
    Apr 27, 2005
    Holyfield was also punching back with bad intentions as well which nullified Tyson's offensive success.
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    I think he had more time to relax and set himself v Berbick because he just stood in front of Mike while Holy spoiled and tied him up basically made the whole fight uncomfortable and then Mike was simply too intimidated to punch freely in the rematch, he wasn`t punching with bad intentions then at all.
     
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Holy didn`t **** in a bottle that`s why.
     
  4. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,538
    14,555
    Dec 20, 2006
    Holyfield didn’t go to prison for ****, for 3 years because he didn’t **** in a bottle?
     
    young griffo and JohnThomas1 like this.
  5. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    No but he may have beat Mike for that reason and Don King ruined Mike`s career by making him sack Rooney.
     
  6. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,023
    10,242
    Mar 23, 2019
    Wasn't Mike on steroids, too? I could be completely wrong, but I thought Mike admitted to that in the past few years.

    I am positive however that Mike admitted to using steroids in general, though.
     
  7. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    No I don`t think Cus was into that stuff, I did read on this forum that he admitted using steroids to put musle on after leaving prison because he was so thin and steroids help give you better recovery after reps so you can pack more lifting into a shorter space of time, I also read someelse say that it effected his punches in a negative way because his more defined muscles hampered his hand speed, his body was different during the 80`s.
     
  8. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,023
    10,242
    Mar 23, 2019
    He seemed built more Herculean in the 80s. I mean, Mike was almost always a built fighter, but he seemed both more bulked and sculpted in his prime. It could have just been simple youth, of course.

    I remember some guy at a bar I was frequenting, after watching Mike walk through Frazier, hollering out "perfect example of 'roid rage!" lol
     
  9. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,023
    10,242
    Mar 23, 2019
    Of course, by the same reasoning we could say Larry was roiding it when he knocked Marvis silly. Somehow I believe it of Mike before Larry though (I could be completely wrong).
     
    Fergy likes this.
  10. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    25,074
    28,713
    Jan 8, 2017
    I think the difference between the ko of Marvis by Holmes and Tyson, is that Holmes didn't really want to hurt Marvis in the long run. While Tyson, if the ref hadn't jumped in would have taken Frazier s head off and carried on. When Tyson was in the zone he was a beast.
     
  11. RulesMakeItInteresting

    RulesMakeItInteresting Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,023
    10,242
    Mar 23, 2019
    The Mike/Marvis fight was the first time I was mightily impressed with Mike. Mostly just by the performance; I had ceased thinking much of Frazier as a contenda after Larry knocked him cross-eyed.

    And I agree, Larry didn't want to hurt Marvis. Iirc, Joe was stirring up a lot of stuff/antagonizing Larry at the time. It might have been more a battle between those two than anything else.

    Joe was apparently very conscious of his place in the ATGs (he was rooting against George vs. Holy because he, paraphrase: "didn't want George getting above him". I think that might have been the same of Larry. Both of those fighters ended up passing him up on the grand ATG list anyway, though (BTW I LOVE all of the fighters in the above paragraph).
     
    Fergy likes this.
  12. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,825
    Feb 18, 2012
    I was more stunned reading this piece of bull**** for a post......
     
  13. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    No he had more definition in the 90`s, he just looked pretty stocky in the 80`s aside from his monsterous neck.
     
  14. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,430
    May 4, 2017
    Oh come on Mike was a far better finishe than Holmes and a harder puncher, he had far more 1st round KO`s.
     
  15. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    25,074
    28,713
    Jan 8, 2017
    I never said he wasn't a better finisher than Holmes, what I said mark, was Larry seemed more reluctant to keep on hitting Marvis while Tyson was blasting away and would have carried on if the ref not stopped it.